Gell-Mann and others came out with quarks around 1964, which were extremely useful in organizing our understanding, but of limited use in computing particle masses!

You need quantum chromodynamics (QCD), invented around 1973, to understand how quarks interact and have a chance at computing the masses of the particles they form.

But even with QCD it's incredibly hard to do the computations! So even now, many things remain mysterious -- and those who love this subject have lots left to do.

For example the lightest spin-1/2 excited state of the proton, the N(1440)⁺, has a mysteriously low mass. It defies simple explanation! It's called the 'Roper resonance' after the guy who found it in 1964, and people have been struggling with it ever since:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roper_resonance

For the epic quest to understand the Roper resonance, read this:

• Volker D. Burkert, Craig D. Roberts ,Roper resonance -- solution to the fifty year puzzle, https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.02549

"This is a prodigious task, but a ten-year international effort, drawing together experimentalists and theorists, has presented a solution to the puzzle."

But don't bet on it being the final word!

This physics of particles made of quarks -- called 'hadron physics' -- is in some ways a lot like nuclear physics, or chemistry. The underlying laws are known. Applying them can be very hard. You wind up needing supercomputers, physics intuition, and rules of thumb.

But nuclear physics is less useful than chemistry, and hadron physics is even less useful. So past a certain point you do it, if at all, for love.

(2/2)

@JonChevreau

No one cares about bill's problems, or bill.

@P__X

"💀"

careful she's still on the scene....

@Sheril It will be a long time before AI can do real interpretation because so much is context dependent, and requires a knowledge of the culture/ethnicity . Certainly in person interpretation services.

As for secretaries, automation has already affected them, by moving many tasks to their bosses! Soon the bosses will have no secretaries and will be spending al their time making their AI try to perform secretarial tasks. Believe me, I have worked in IT and know that 99% of the bosses (and programmers) don't know what their secretaries do. And I have seen how things like automated calendars moved the work to the managers.

But I never thought management or programmers particularly savvy, and sometimes they aren't even smart.