| website | https://pon.edu.pl/ |
| links | https://linktr.ee/pon_icm |
🆕 The Principles of Open Science Monitoring, developed as a result of consultations led by @osmi and @unesco, are now available online:
🔗 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15807480
The principles focus on three key pillars: 1) relevance & significance, 2) transparency & reproducibility, 3) self-assessment & responsible use.
💡 They are not intended for assessing individual researchers. Instead, they are to serve as the framework of past and upcoming OS monitoring systems worldwide.
🎂 July 2nd, 2015 - the first DOI was assigned to a dataset in our research data repository RepOD 👉 https://repod.icm.edu.pl/
📆 Today we host almost 60 institutional dataverses and over 2 600 datasets.
You can read more about RepOD here: https://info.repod.icm.edu.pl/?page_id=56&lang=en
#repositories #RDM #openscience #researchdata #dataverse #academia #research
@coar_repositories report on the impact of AI bots and crawlers on open repositories:
💬 "The recent rise in aggressive bots activity could potentially result in repositories limiting access to their resources for both human and machine users – leading to a situation where the value of the global repository network is substantially diminished."
#RDM #openscience #academia #repositories
image: freepik | Storyset
✅ RepOD - the Repository for Open Data, which serves as Poland's national infrastructure for research data, has been certified as a Trustworthy Data Repository by the CoreTrustSeal Standards and Certification Board.
🔗 You can view our certificate here: https://amt.coretrustseal.org/certificates
RepOD is freely available to all researchers who wish to make their research data open.
"other efforts had mostly focused on English-language content and were locked behind paywalls or limited to a specific subfield of psychology. Our collection would thus serve as a valuable resource (...), bridging an accessibility gap for tools that are readily available in the West".
@alelazic on efforts behind creating #REPOPSI - centralised, open-access Repository of Psychological Instruments in Serbian.
🆕 💡 @DORAssessment is launching “A Practical Guide to Implementing Responsible Research Assessment at Research Performing Organizations”
➡️ The Guide is targeted to help staff at RPOs to plan for and take action in implementing responsible research assessment.
➡️ It provides responses to one of the most common questions the DORA team gets asked: ‘How do I get started?’.
Join online panel sessions 👉 register here https://sfdora.org/launch-of-practical-guide-for-responsible-research-assessment-reform/
🆕 📄 on ORCID adoption among researchers 👇
💡 "The top three reasons for not having an ORCID are:
1️⃣ not seeing the benefits,
2️⃣ being far enough in the academic career to not need it,
3️⃣ working in an academic discipline where it is not needed."
Porter, S.R. Understanding ORCID adoption among academic researchers. Scientometrics (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05300-7
Just over a decade ago, the ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier) was created to provide a unique digital identifier for researchers around the world. The ORCID has proven essential in identifying individual researchers and their publications, both for bibliometric research analyses and for universities and other organizations tracking the research productivity and impact of their personnel. Yet widespread adoption of the ORCID by individual researchers has proved elusive, with previous studies finding adoption rates ranging from 3% to 42%. Using a national survey of U.S. academic researchers at 31 research universities, we investigate why some researchers adopt an ORCID and some do not. We found an overall adoption rate of 72%, with adoptions rates ranging between academic disciplines from a low of 17% in the visual and performing arts to a high of 93% in biological and biomedical sciences. Many academic journals require an ORCID to submit a manuscript, and this is the main reason why researchers adopt an ORCID. The top three reasons for not having an ORCID are not seeing the benefits, being far enough in the academic career to not need it, and working in an academic discipline where it is not needed.
Open Call for mentees 💡 Join the OSTrails Mentorship Programme on DMPs, SKGs and FAIR Assessment
📆 🔔 Apply by April 25th
👉 https://ostrails.eu/ostrails-mentorship-programme-on-dmps-sgks-and-fair-assessment-open-call-for-mentees
Participants will benefit from personalised guidance, support, and the sharing of experiences from leading experts in the field.
❤️ Starting #LoveData25 with 🆕 institutional dataverse in RepOD Repository for Open Data ➡️ University of Bielsko-Biala 🔓 https://repod.icm.edu.pl/dataverse/ubb
💙 This is 4️⃣ 9️⃣ th institutional dataverse in our data repository!
💡 Browse, explore, download, and reuse datasets in RepOD 💡
6️⃣ upcoming webinars in #PathOS Training Corner ➡️ new expert-led series of trainings and resources that explore impacts of #OpenScience
🔗 https://pathos-project.eu/training
✅ Measuring the Societal Impact of Open Science
✅ Key Impact Pathways of Open Science
✅ Exploring the Academic Impact of Open Science
✅ Exploring the Economic Impact of Open Science
✅ Cost Benefit Analysis Framework for Open Science
✅ Open Science Impact Indicator Handbook, Tools and Data
