| Info | https://getinthesea.au |
| :birdsite: | https://twitter.com/AppeasePoseidon |
| Info | https://getinthesea.au |
| :birdsite: | https://twitter.com/AppeasePoseidon |
Australia has all the submarines it needs, and knows the correct place for their deployment. The only thing we should be putting in the sea is more Prime Ministers.
Why put expensive submarines in the sea when Prime Ministers are an inexpensive and renewable resource and could be rapidly deployed instead? What could be a better defense for our nation than having the might of Poseidon on our side?
The Australian Navy has been left with just one fully operational submarine as the rest of its aging Collins-class fleet undergoes urgent repairs or await upgrades. Defence sources have confirmed to the ABC two of the Collins submarines are currently stationed in Adelaide, where there are delays to maintenance.
I consider there to be only two ways it's legitimate to leave the Australian Prime Ministership:
- Getting into the sea
- Imprisonment
#programming #names Aargh
Throw the programmers in the sea
Surf's up, Albo!
In about three months it'll be 57 years since we sent our Prime Minister into the sea! This is a disgraceful delay for what we feel should be at least an annual event.
Obviously we need to raise awareness of this issue, so we'll need a catchy slogan. "Albanese, get in the sea-se" maybe?
Any better suggestions?