@katebowles @actualham @Bracken I think we are getting at the formation of communities that might be linked/federated and open-ish, but not absolutely open: a screened-in porch and a front yard vs the middle of public main street that is FB/Twitter.
I don't know Mastodon architecture or code well enuf to say, so I'm only brainstorming (or BS'ing one might say) here. Might there be a way to identify toots as belonging to a particular community. Can't say why yet, but hashtag doesn't seem ..
@katebowles @actualham @Bracken 2) hashtag doesn't seem to do it - too subject specific. I want something that says "all the people in this room" - i.e. my open ed community. Twitter/FB don't do this. For example, I can't separate my family from work colleagues on FB.
Perhaps this is simply an interface issue, with making it easier to assign the people I follow to groups (rooms?) and then have a timeline just for that room and a different timeline for another room.
@econproph @actualham @Bracken Thinking: on Twitter, hashtags have the capacity to become persistent (in Australia, #auspol is a well known one). So a federated studio formation might need the capacity to build out rooms at this point, rather than necessarily forming as rooms right away and then seeing if they work or don't.
The screened sleepout is a lovely model. There's an urban design philosophy of "walkable neighbourhoods" that relates.
@econproph @actualham @Bracken This is the philosophy: https://www.walkscore.com/walkable-neighborhoods.shtml
The issue for any co-working space emerging from social networks is propensity to sameness. That's the issue that was raised at #opened16 and has to be front of mind here, or the "we" quickly becomes a sort mechanism for homogeneity.
Making an intentionally open community is really tough in this climate.