Q: Why do UFC fighters say so many racist and xenophobic things? Is it because they're terrible people?

Q: Why do cops pull over so many Black drivers? Are they terrible people?

Q: Why do ICE agents detain non-violent immigrant families? Terrible?

Let's look at Colby Covington's transformation.

[I've said this before on Twitter years ago, but I erased it, so I have to say it again]

Colby Covington was a good college wrestler. Not much you can do with that career wise.🤷🏿‍♂️

He decided to pursue a career in the UFC.

His MMA fighting style was based on wrestling: take you down, punch you.

If you lose too many fights in the UFC, you won't get your contract renewed. You have to win to stay.

Colby Covington was winning. He had 7 wins and only 1 loss.

This is how Colby Covington used to talk to promote his fights.

And yes, he beat DHK after this, to improve to 8 wins and 1 loss.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2FCSd98MCk

Colby Covington - DHK Isn't Ready for Me

YouTube

His next fight was against Demian Maia, a dangerous 5th degree Black belt in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. And the fight would be in Brazil, Demian's home country.

Colby's manager alleged that the UFC told him that even if Colby beat Demian, his contract would not be renewed. Because he was boring.

A wrestler can't just become a kickboxer or boxer overnight. He couldn't change his fighting style to be more interesting.

So he created a character. A persona, like a wrestler. He leaned into being super offensive MAGA guy.

He said super offensive things about Brazilians that I won't repeat.

So the UFC did re-sign him, and he became very popular with UFC fans thanks to his out of the cage MAGA antics.

Would he have gone super MAGA if his livelihood weren't threatened? Was this mask on or mask off? Which Colby is the character, and which one is real?

Who is at fault? Colby? UFC? Fans?

Is there a difference between:

"I say terrible things because it's the easiest way I know to stay employed. But I don't enjoy it."

And

"I say terrible things because it's the easiest way I know to stay employed. And I do enjoy it."

If you wanted to incentivize a reduction in the number of offensive and harmful things that UFC fighters say, where is the right place to drive that incentive?

The fighters?

The leagues?

The fans?

Is there a difference between an ICE agent that does enjoy detaining innocent people, vs one that doesn't enjoy it but does it anyway, because it's an easy way to get paid?

Is the ICE agent evil?

Or is ICE evil?

Or are ICE's "fans," the people that want to see negative net migration, evil?

What's the best leverage point if you want to incentivize reducing the number of innocent people detained by ICE?

Is it the individual ICE agents?

Or ICE?

Or ICE's fans?

There is some true percent of the US population that really are super offensively MAGA.

At times when MAGA is out of favor, some MAGA people mask, and pretend not to be MAGA.

At other times when MAGA is popular, some people that are not MAGA, pretend to be MAGA.
🙂🙃

Is one better for society? Why?

Conor McGregor says many offensive things. Most US folk, even those that don't follow MMA, know who Conor is. Conor loses a lot. He has only won 1 fight since 2016.🤷🏿‍♂️

Khabib Nurmagomedov avoids saying offensive things. Most people don't know who he is. He retired undefeated, having never lost in MMA.

Does that say something about Conor?

Or about UFC fans?

Or about Americans?

What are we worshipping?

@mekkaokereke Toxic masculinity.

@HumToTable

Unfortunately no.

Toxic masculinity and racism / xenophobia are not the same.

If we were worshipping toxic masculinity, then we would hold Khabib in higher regard than Conor. Khabib is tougher, more manly, lives a more ascetic and spartan lifestyle, and conforms even more rigidly to harmful self-imposed gender roles and rules for conduct appropriate for a man.

We're worshipping something even worse.

@mekkaokereke
Is WWF the same?

@ohmu. Nope. WWF is the World Wildlife Fund. Hulk Hogan and the rest of the "wrestlers" lost the right to use WWF to a bunch of animal rights activists in 2000. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWF_trademark_dispute

(I know this isn’t what you were asking, but I still giggle every time I think of the macho-man muscle-bound jerks losing their brand name to an environmental group.)

@mekkaokereke

WWF trademark dispute - Wikipedia

@ohmu

Similar in that most of the rank and file and leadership are Trumpy, but the champs and fan favorites are anti-racism. Hulk Hogan was super racist, and many of the 80s characters were very racist. But most of the modern fan favorites have been anti-racism and anti-Trump, both in character and out.

John Cena
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wVbHeSereR0

Mick Foley
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/u7pKLNK0XA0

Dave Bautista
https://youtube.com/shorts/aXQdYzwalEw

Steve Austin
https://youtube.com/shorts/Vltm88cipuA

Commercial We Are America ft John Cena Love Has No Labels Ad Council

YouTube
@mekkaokereke
Are the UFC champs and fan favorites also anti-racist?

@ohmu

Francis Ngannou was the heavyweight champ, until he quit the UFC. Here's what he had to say about Trump. He has a thick Cameroonian French accent. English is his 3rd language.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IU1oZKBLEHE

Francis Ngannou Reacts to Donald Trump's Alleged Controversial Comments - MMA Fighting

YouTube
@mekkaokereke
P.s., I knew about John Cena being this way because of your posts.

@mekkaokereke

Khabib’s victory against McGregor was
👨‍🍳 😚 👌🏽

@mekkaokereke Hey, Battlebots is great. 😉

@mekkaokereke I posted but then deleted a musing on why Nak Muay from Thailand rarely compete in MMA except in a handful of specialist promotions. The answer is that Muay Thai is a national sport that's fought with honour and respect between competitors, and MMA is perceived as the opposite over there.

There are other reasons - lack of ground skills and the Thai ruleset favouring kicking, requiring a more upright stance leaving them vulnerable to takedowns - but the main reason is...just nah. 🤷🏻‍♂️

@mekkaokereke there's still a large number of Americans a little bitter and twisted about the Confederates losing and support that too ...
@mekkaokereke If the fans are fine with it, no incentive for league or individuals to change. That whole thing seems vulgar to me, so vulgar is as vulgar dors?
@mekkaokereke The league is the bottleneck and the easiest place to control, but the power is in the fans.

@mekkaokereke
i see your point and i’d add that there may be a difference between enjoying it and not, because one offers a simpler breaking point: if one doesn’t enjoy it, it may be easier to convince, cajole, or coerce them into not doing it or even being against it.

i know, little difference.

@mekkaokereke

Let me just put it this way: if I were offered a job in a red state I'd deny in the most ridiculous way possible.

Furthermore I think pandering to wannabe alphas is just asking for trouble, and I'd go as far as doing the opposite in the most extreme way possible that is reasonably doable in a way that doesn't cause the whole operation to collapse.
@mekkaokereke Karim Zidan has some great coverage on this. He has covered MMA extensively over the years and deeply covers politics and fascism.
Various links over on Bluesky. https://www.npr.org/2026/06/15/nx-s1-5856327/the-politics-behind-the-white-houses-ufc-event
@mekkaokereke Do they all suffer from traumatic brain injury? Is that part of the initiation ritual? It feels like if we devoted some science/money to this issue, we might be able to solve some important problems.
@mekkaokereke Thanks for this thread. I've been saying for the last decade that if people really want to understand US politics, they need to study pro wrestling. I don't follow UFC, but it sounds like the incentives are pretty similar. It's easier to get a crowd invested by getting people to boo you than it is to get them to cheer for you. But none of that happens in a vacuum: someone is booking the matches, producing the promo packages, renting the arena, and selling tickets. Most athletes in other sports do not behave like this, because other sports are structured differently. If we want our politics to change, we have to dismantle the incentive structures that produce this behavior. Down thread you ask what needs to change. My answer would be "all of the above".
@tarotbird @mekkaokereke Give it ten years, and there will be a Netflix-style doc about Dana White (who is a bad boss, and treats his competitors as wholly disposable) in the same vein as the one they did on Vince McMahon. Trump's one true skill was in reimagining federal politics as pro wrestling, complete with faces, villains, kayfabe, works, the whole thing, and as a nation, we're eating it up.
@tarotbird @mekkaokereke Neil Hebert and Jon Cogburn published a book along these lines earlier this year, _Kayfabe Nation: Professional Wrestling, Donald Trump, and the New Cynicism_. It's free to read online, and there's also a paperback you can buy: https://punctumbooks.com/titles/kayfabe-nation-professional-wrestling-donald-trump-and-the-new-cynicism/.
Kayfabe Nation: Professional Wrestling, Donald Trump, and the New Cynicism – punctum books

@tarotbird @mekkaokereke Interesting you should mention that. A few years ago, there was a Ted Talk that argued American 24 hour news channels basically copied the TV pro wrestling formula in how they cover politics.

And who made this observation?

Eric Bischoff.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2RCT6Li4UQ

(For those unfamiliar with him, Bischoff was a pro wrestling promoter in the 1990s. His main claim to fame is the main weekly show for the wrestling company he ran, WCW, managed to beat the WWE in the TV ratings for 83 consecutive weeks.)

And there's merit to the argument.

I mean think about how 24-hour news channels in the US present politics.

There's a clear hero and villain.

It doesn't matter if the crowd cheers or boos, as long as they react.

There's a conflict.

There's stakes.

There's long pieces to camera, where the talent puts their case to the audience in a way that will elicit a reaction.

There's commentators who explain the characters, storylines, and highlight why one protagonist is a heel and the other is a babyface.

(You could take the argument a step further and point out the algorithms on commercial social media apps serve to present politics in a very similar way.)

Now apply that formula for news and politics to an audience that already carries strong racial prejudices.

What you get is Fox News.

It's not by accident either.

If you have a 24-hour news channel that shows a news bulletin on the hour, and the most people will watch for is 60 minutes, unless a major news event is happening.

Present it as pro-wrestling-style news entertainment, and people will watch for hours.

And after 30-odd years, what you end up with is politicians like Trump, who basically act in public life like a pro wrestling character.

#wcw #WWE #EricBischoff #politics #FoxNews #wrestling #prowrestling #auspol #uspol
Why the News Media is stealing from the Pro Wrestling playbook | Eric Bischoff | TEDxNaperville

YouTube
@tarotbird @mekkaokereke constitutional convention. Two different countries. That's the only plausible way out I see at this time. Has to be led by CA-NY-TX to work.

@mekkaokereke

You know, white supremacy isn’t just going to support itself! You’ve got to set up social structures of reinforcement.

@mekkaokereke

One possible answer on Colby Covington:

“Historians have a word for Germans who joined the Nazi party, not because they hated Jews, but out of a hope for restored patriotism, or a sense of economic anxiety, or a hope to preserve their religious values, or dislike of their opponents, or raw political opportunism, or convenience, or ignorance, or greed.

"That word is 'Nazi.' Nobody cares about their motives anymore."

― A.R. Moxon