Mastodon has an account verification system, but it works differently to most social networks. There is no central authority confirming people's identity, instead there is a self-service system based on ownership of websites or web pages. You can find out more at:

➡️ https://fedi.tips/how-do-i-verify-my-account

For example, the official account for LibreOffice is @libreoffice and we know it is official because their profile page's link to https://www.libreoffice.org is green.

#FediTips #Mastodon #Verification

How do I verify my account on Mastodon and the Fediverse? | Fedi.Tips – An Unofficial Guide to Mastodon and the Fediverse

An unofficial guide to using Mastodon and the Fediverse

@FediTips This is very useful!

Another indirect verification would be the domain of an instance. If there is an accout of bbc (for example) with the "bbc.com" domain,you know its them.

And that applies for fediversal software that don't have a built-in verification system!

@marcelcosta

Yup, that's another way of doing it 👍

For example the European Union has many official accounts such as @EUCommission in the "europa.eu" domain which is their official website.

@FediTips @verge If your website is IPv6-only, some Mastodon servers (including mastodon.social) will fail to verify it. To fix this, ask your instance admin to enable support for both IPv4 and IPv6.

@rickvanrooijen

Yup, I think it also works if you set your website to be IPv4 and IPv6?

@FediTips Yes, but it makes more sense to add IPv6 support rather than IPv4 support, so that we can eventually reach a point where dual-stack operation is no longer necessary.
@FediTips Which is pretty cool but a wholly different kind of "verification" by concept. Not bad, but more about "verifying you're in administrative control of a particular website or domain" rather than "verifying you're the person you claim to be" or "verifying you're a legal representative of an entity you claim to represent". There's a thin line between these I guess.

@z428eu

I take your point, but it's difficult to think of a scenario where an official website would verify an account that doesn't belong to them? 🙂

On the other hand, a major weak point is that not everyone has a website, and not every website is well known as being official. 😦

The original idea of the rel=me standard was to verify accounts from different social networks, but unfortunately Meta, Twitter, Google etc refused to use open standards. This left just the Fedi and websites.

@FediTips Yes. I also don't think it's completely pointless. But in a way it feels like not actually verifying anything but rather pushing the problem elsewhere. My main gripe here is that ... even though this makes sense, it feels very much built around that rel=me which seems very much like trying to bend a problem to match an actual standard that solves "something". It's not a bad solution, but ... just not a solution to the problem of "have someone /I/ trust verify that persons, institutions, ... are who they claim they are". It seems /much/ more web-of-trust to me than rel=me.
@FediTips @libreoffice I don't have a website. 🫤

@Satiah

This verification system works using a general standard called "rel=me", which wasn't originally designed for just websites.

The original idea was you could just mention your accounts from other platforms and it would verify you were the same person in those accounts on that other platform.

Mastodon obeys the standard but unfortunately Google, Meta/Facebook, Twitter etc refuse to use the standard, so the only way to use it was having your own website and a Mastodon account.