RE: https://phpc.social/@theshaunwalker/116753314614249073
As someone who found friends and community exclusively through the online world back when I was a teen, 💯
RE: https://phpc.social/@theshaunwalker/116753314614249073
As someone who found friends and community exclusively through the online world back when I was a teen, 💯
@Gargron if these are going to be the laws going forward, as governments across the western world seem to be taking identical lock-step action, what's left that can still be accessed for those young people?
They will need a completely decentralized social alternative with no corporation/centralizing element. This might actually turn out to be the catalyst that the internet needs to become fully decentralized.
I expect those young people will find a way forward, perhaps to benefit us all.
@Gargron Some form of regulation is inevitable. All we had to worry about as kids were popup ads.
The product these kids are using is harmful and built that way deliberately.
I don't know what the right solution is, though. It would be good if parents were more active, but they're not. This problem persists because the vast majority park a child in front of a screen and leave them there.
Indeed, it needs to be regulated. This tech IS dangerous, as we've seen in Belfast. But I think where it misses the mark is by putting the onus users and their parents instead of disciplining the social media companies. Especially those providing tools to produce, for free, child sexual material.
Because at the end of the day, it does damage to grown arse adults too!
@FlashMobOfOne @Gargron it's dealing with the companies that make the product. That made them harmful. On purpose. Knowingly.
We know Facebook/Meta has done and continues to do this.
The solution is not targeting the population for surveillance. It is fucking regulating these techbros who think they're gods.
Screens are not the issue. TV doesn't hurt, we have programming regulations in place, things like watershed, advertising laws. Social media giants should not be left to their own devices.
@Gargron
And we still can, as this legislation is targeted at the most dangerous and exploitative techbros.
Mastodon is a wonderful alternative and I'm so glad I found a community here.
Huge 👏 to you for making it happen.
@Gargron started chatting through ICQ with someone on the other side of the world 25 years ago. Moved on to voice (and occasional video) calls on NetMeeting shortly after. Progressed onto Skype after we arranged to meet up in IRL. Now been married 20 years.
Which is to say - our lives would have been totally different if either of us had to ID ourselves on any of those platforms in the beginning... The whole theme back then was the wild west - in fact our first conversation was about if we were talking to scammers or chatbots - ha ha ha!
So not only are we denying kids the freedom to find people and make friends, I'm pretty certain our younger selves would never have enjoyed that freedom either. Back then we enjoyed discovery through anonymous contact and neither of us would have registered with the Stasi at any stage. (And still won't! As internet old-timers we still use pseudonyms with no personal data as far as possible...)
In fairness, it's only the big platforms that are being restricted. Although in terms of policy that just seems like kicking the can further down the road. Banning platform X and Y isn't really gonna do anything to truly solve the harms young people (and everyone else) may be exposed to.
@Gargron Same. The forum communities I helped run were very welcoming to young people, and we always tried to treat them fairly, much like we had been treated fairly when we were younger.
And when I was a little bit older, and the US started to push their COPPA laws, children under 13 were suddenly ostensible banned from everywhere.
Things have been going down hill since then. Big Tech has fucked up the social fabric of the internet, and now draconian laws are here to deal the finishing blow.
@ocelot221 @Gargron Though that isn't helped by certain large actors in the space making it that way. It's a blanket ban that only helps that toxicity spread because often the internet is the safe space, take that away and you're left with whatever hell social media saved them from.
Regulate the companies, not the kids.
@Gargron
Contemporary social media has been engineered to prey on addictive habits that younger generations have already been acclimatised to (which is not to say our generation cannot also fall victim).
The simple truth is society should be regulating the producers and publishers, not the consumers. The answer is not banning children from online interaction (including through games), but unfortunately we have allowed the platforms to become too wealthy, powerful, and influential.
imo social media isn't the problem but the algos are bad for everyone. are they considering chat rooms to be social media? I wish we'd all clearly distinguish the very public posting with boosts as social media, while calling most everything else social networking. I think my daughter did well chatting with friends while not being subject to corporate platforms.
Yeah, but I it was pre algorythmically controlled social media and pre smartphone (I assume). Completely different times...
It's like comparing weed and heroin.
@Gargron I grew up in the 1970s and had a great childhood with many connections with no electronic devices except TV and radio.
Phones can enable greater access but face to face is an order of magnitude different.
@Irisherself really?
You think Croatia has no problems similar to (or worse than) the UK..?
Interesting/weird take
Good on some things bad on others - just like most places.
https://www.dw.com/en/in-croatia-resurgent-far-right-shifts-political-climate/a-74845315
@Gargron Humans could not possibly affect any healthy social interaction without physical proximity.
I am being sarcastic for anybody that does not recognize or know me.