My current way to interest people to join us: The Fediverse is more like local politics, with small communities discussing things. Centralised networks like Twitter, TikTok, instagram etc are more like national politics, with loud mouthpieces shouting over everyone else.

This mental image helps me in understanding why the influencers fail here and they of course think that means that the fediverse must be a lost cause while we commoners happily chug along and enjoy our little street parties ;)

I am happy to hear in the replies that this visualisation resonates! May it help you all to find new fedinauts to join our street parties! And don't forget to share some food with the many cats that stroll around ;)

@jwildeboer

I tried to find something like astronaut with Mastodon, mastodonaut?, but I don't know.

But I like fedinaut.

@MichelPatrice It seemed logical to me: Universe -> Fediverse, Astronaut, Kosmonaut, Taikonaut -> Fedinaut :)

@jwildeboer

Yes, I totally get the logic. It is just that I didn't find at first that mastodonaut roll off the tongue very well in french.

But on a second thought, yes, it does sound nice in french and so I'm adopting "mastodonaute" in french.

I will writing to the Académie tomorrow in the morning.

@MichelPatrice In my opinion: the fediverse is bigger than just mastodon. Activitypub, the underlying protocol, connects many services. So I prefer fedinaut, it's more inclusive :)

@jwildeboer

There is probably something similar in german. In french there is internaute for the one who navigates the internet.

It is an old word from, I think, the "information highway" era.

@MichelPatrice Another alternative I use at times is "I am a member of the federati" :)

@jwildeboer

"I am a member of the federati" which I'm reading in Jean-Luc Picard's voice.

@jwildeboer also grateful for the lack of influencers
@Mercurial @jwildeboer We have local influencers, storytellers etc. And village idiots.
@aslakr @Mercurial @jwildeboer We definitely have a better class of village idiot though, wouldn't you say? I mean, some of our shitposters have real talent, and aren't nearly as stupid as they pretend to be! 🤷🏻‍♂️

@aslakr @Mercurial @jwildeboer

Village idiots are better than national idiots. Quieter.

@jwildeboer Last night I watched a video about some of the history of medieval taverns. "Alehouses" used to be literally someone's house: the lady of the house that day made ale, so for a couple days her house was the neighbourhoods alehouse (until she ran out of ale).
I kinda want that in the real world, and your analogy of the little street parties made me think of that.
@jwildeboer I love this analogy! I am on Bluesky too which I enjoy for my friends when we left Twitter years ago, politics (which can be overwhelming with the geyser of news daily), football, and writers. Here I’m just me, interacting with interesting people, wordling daily, and baking and reading lot about computers. It makes me happy 😊

@jwildeboer Yes! If the goal is "convincing people of a predetermined agenda", then fedi is indeed a failure -- not a very good tool for propaganda. The masters will not find it pleasing.

If the goal is "getting good ideas into the discussion so they can propagate naturally", however... ^.^

@jwildeboer so, this is where your friends and family are?
@evan I'd say the social distance between participants of the Fediverse is far shorter than on centralised social networks, yes. I definitely found friends here. Friends as in people that are willing to work together on positive things. On centralised networks my experience always was that people connect based on being AGAINST something. Here, more often, people band together FOR something.

@jwildeboer @evan "My friends and family are here when I invite them in to see something cool I've been working-on. In the meantime, like minded randos occasionally visit to help me build said cool thing because they are way more experienced/interested in cool thing than friends/family and give way better advice. Some of them become friends, but most just appreciate getting to help build cool thing."

Just like my house.

@jwildeboer @evan

That's the algorithms.

On the big corporate sites, everything is getting steered for "engagement" which usually means conflict. The divide and conquer thing, deliberately designed to be toxic.

@violetmadder Yes, that's for sure. But that argument doesn't really "stick" in my experience when talking to people about why they should give the fediverse a try. @evan

@jwildeboer @evan

Because for some reason most people seem to have no clue just how pernicious and awful those algorithms are.

I left Facebook as soon as it became clear it was pushing in my face the exact types of things I'd rather NOT engage with. It was like watching sewage seeping in to fill the room, but loads of people are still standing around nattering while the rising flood laps against their chins.

@jwildeboer That's a really interesting question! This is actually a measurable quantity -- mean path length between nodes in the graph. It's the famous "six degrees of separation" metric. Meta showed a mean path of ~4.5 hops on their network in 2016:

https://research.facebook.com/blog/2016/2/three-and-a-half-degrees-of-separation/

I have no idea what it is today, or what it is on the Fediverse -- I think it would be a really interesting calculation to do!

Three and a half degrees of separation - Meta Research | Meta Research

In honor of Friends Day, we've recalculated the classic 'Six degrees of separation' statistic for everyone who uses Facebook and determined that the number is actually 3.57. Each person in the world (at least among the 1.55 billion people active on Facebook) is connected to every other person by an average of three and a half steps.

Meta Research
@jwildeboer That said, I don't think "I've found friends here" is the same as "my friends and family are here".
@jwildeboer Also, the idea that people on the Fediverse are *positively* instead of *negatively* motivated is interesting. I've always thought of it as the opposite -- that people get started on the Fediverse because of their disillusionment with siloed social networks, and that it's hard to maintain that motivation long enough to actually make a home here. I think there may be some survivorship bias, though: people who have been here a while have found something here that gives them meaning.

@evan @jwildeboer

There is a self-selection that gives the fedi a particular culture. E.g., I am here because I find targeted adtech social media disgusting human torture chambers.

But to think of the fediverse as "positive" oriented is strange. There are recurring episodes of toxic attacks on anybody expressing an opinion that doesn't fit the echo chamber and that's just my limited graph.

Being open source, decentralized etc is not a magic wand that fixes inherent limits of online worlds.

@openrisk I'd say there is no "the" fediverse. The experience people make is more self-determined compared to centralised, algorithmic networks. You can decide to block out the toxicity, or you can decide to let it in to your timeline. A little bit of curation delivers far better results here than on the other side. @evan
@evan Yes. Absolutely. I did bring my sister and mum over, though :)

@jwildeboer

Sorry but disagree. I see here some "influencers" acting at smaller scale. Not the same ones than in megacorp networks, neither same discourse but the same patterns: disinformation, cult to personality by their followers and no rational debate.

@jwildeboer
#Fediverse is like a Berlin rave party on unclaimed real estate in the early 1990ies before techno got commercial.
@jwildeboer I think that's also a great thing about mastodon.
@jwildeboer The Fediverse is for craft tweets with a soul. ;)
@jwildeboer but, like a commoners, we don't need to be small. We must to be people. we must to be massive.
@jwildeboer I think my experience in local politics is very different from yours 😬
@vicgrinberg My experience here in Munich, Bavaria, is that local politics is messy but also very personal. It's people that discuss, sometimes very heated, on local issues in pragmatic ways. Not hiding behind abstract party arguments. And at the end of the meetings, we all go to a beer garden and shake hands.
@jwildeboer my experience is in the same area (Augsburg & Munich) some ~20 years ago when a lot has been about "old boys" (and sometimes their proteges') networks and a lot of "this is how we have always done it".
@jwildeboer ... which may also be a bit like fediverse, now that I've written it down.
@jwildeboer it was very much not "communities discussing" in my experience and made me step away from active politics for the next 20 years, so I very much hope the fediverse is not only like this ;)
@vicgrinberg At least here in Trudering local politics have left the old boys network and backroom deals behind since quite some years. You do find that on the city council level, though. But my corner seems to prefer openness a lot.
@jwildeboer I'm glad there are better corners and that things have changed!
@jwildeboer When the purchase of Twitter was in full swing, I remember delighting in telling academics making fun of the fediverse "it's like a little network of neighborhood bars where people come together and chat about whatever. It's not going to give you the 'author signing at a Borders with the worlds shittiest manager you can blame for -not handling- the crazies that you get into messy fights-with' energy that you desperately crave."
@jwildeboer I like this lens. I think of open source as an interesting pond with lovely surprises...like spotting a frog or blooms or a creek that feeds the pond. We are curious fish. We like discovery and oxygen.The big tech platforms are water parks with constructed slides, poolside cotton candy and big gulps, sunscreen, and swim fashion. The influencers have megaphones and whistles to tell us when the schedule changes and how to stay safe. To hold your attention, they introduce increasingly insane clickbait innovations like a 180⁰ water slide with an option to add a waterproof VR headset.
@jwildeboer Ah! Perfect description 🤗
@jwildeboer There are people who want community, and then there are people who want to monetize communities.

@jwildeboer

I like this "lost cause" and the parties. ;)

@jwildeboer I see my Fedi experience as being local in terms of the like-minded people I follow, but not in terms of geography. I have only met face-to-face with a few people who I follow here and they are not very active. None of my relatives or in-laws are here. As a person in the US, regrettably, what I like is the cosmopolitan nature of the Fedi and my ability to follow interesting and kind people all over the world.
@jwildeboer when I tell people there are no influencers, no algorithms trying to control them, no ads, and no one trying to sell their data, it usually gets their attention.
@jwildeboer it sounds like you are describing Mastodon as an echo chamber
@bygone12 @jwildeboer on the contrary, a thinking person doesn't go to a party just to be surrounded by their own opinions! In fact, while I find many people whose conversations and observations I agree with, it's the things I /didn't/ already know, the nuance and the new perspectives that I appreciate here. I do miss my longtime FB friends, who I know and like IRL, but for someone privacy-conscious like me, only being visible to friends really does become an echo chamber, a cheerleading group with the same cheers being passed around endlessly. And on FB, there's really no way to free-swim. In the fediverse I can party-surf without fear of pile-ons or loss of privacy, pretty much.

@jwildeboer
What's cool is that I see lots of posts about local or niche topics ("small communities") *and* posts about international news that I can't find in many of the mainstream news sources I follow. It's a very eclectic mix that depends on what users and hashtags you follow.

It's so helpful to be able to follow hashtags, not just do searches with them!

#Fediverse

@jwildeboer I think you forgot the propaganda, the mass control, the toxic algorithm, the intentional depression and consumerism, advertising and competition over attention through money investment.. I don't think that has something to do with national (or local) politics.
@jwildeboer
That's probably the best way of putting it! 
@jwildeboer I think your description of the fediverse is right on the money. Thanks for putting it so succinctly.

@jwildeboer

In theory but in reality almost none of my local communities use the Fediverse.

There does also seem to be quite a high proportion of US users.