When you block or mute someone, should you tell them?

#EvanPoll #poll

Yes
Yes, but...
No, but...
No
Poll ends at .
@evan I might tell other people that I'm connected to that I have blocked or muted someone so they know they won't have to deal with that person when they're connected to me. The blocked or muted person will figure it out.
@evan feels passive aggressive to me to do so, like an attempt to get the last lick in before going la la la cant hear you
@kim Calling that kind of behaviour _passive_ aggressive seems generous.

@evan lol trueeee

i guess aggression doesnt feel quite right tho either to describe it, its a secret third thing?

@evan Any time someone has reached out to me to let me know that they're blocking/muting me and why, it /always/ makes me feel worse about it and I imagine I'm not alone in that.

I can respect the gesture of trying to take away the "why did they do that though?" but it never actually works as intended, it just feels like rubbing salt in the wound.

@evan
We have an old saying in Germany: Be wise, block quietly. (Sei weise, kill leise). Sometimes, however, it makes sense to mention the block in a final reply (and really more for everyone else who might be following the dispute).

So, a Yes, but...

@evan

If you're in a moderator role, it makes sense to tell people why they've been banned/blocked/muted.

Otherwise, it is what it is, and we don't need to discuss it.

I regularly engage in what I call content sculpting where I'm fine-tuning my feed like a graphic equalizer. It's nothing personal. I'm probably just not interested.

Exception where I would say something is if this person is being a major asshole or a Nazi. Then, my hope is other people will also block them. But this is rare.

@evan Yes, but. When I've had a conversation and then been blocked, I've often wished that the person would tell me why, or offer me a chance to apologise. Maybe the other person is right and I'm wrong; maybe I've said something that, on reflection, I regret.

Muting I think is less serious: sometimes it's just someone wanting a pause, which is perfectly reasonable.

If there's someone you just don't want to read, generally not following suffices, but sometimes a quiet block is the solution.

@evan girl I block about fifteen people a day, I’m not writing each one an apology first

@evan my previous answer was flippant…

The question seems to ask whether we have some moral obligation to inform people, to which I think the answer is obviously not. If somebody I’m not expecting knocks on my door, I have no obligation to open it or even to be at home. The knocking can just be un-acked.

But… I still voted “no, but”. I definitely think you can tell them, and it might even be a kind thing to do, depending on the previous relationship you’ve had. I would feel pretty bad if I was close with somebody, or they depended on me, and then I locked them out of my life without a word.

@danso I think of this as more a question of etiquette of morality; what's the proper thing to do.

You don't really block 15 people a day, do you?

@evan

@mpjgregoire @evan the actual number varies, but I block every commenter that’s hostile or bad-faith if it comes from somebody I don’t know, even when their comment is not directed at me.

A few days ago there was a post on fecesbook about the ALF in France burning 15 refrigerated trucks that got a lot of attention. I probably blocked > 100 people that day.

@danso
Why? I mean, maybe they deserve to be blocked, but maybe even without a block you'll never cross paths with them again...

@mpjgregoire when I learned that nearly all the hateful posts online are made by < 1% of its users, it got me thinking maybe I could create a curated internet by just blocking them all.

I still see hateful posts sometimes, so it hasn’t totally worked (yet).

But I just think, if this person is hateful, why give them a chance to direct their hate at me? Why wait? If blocking hundreds of people means I don’t get a hateful message later, it’ll be worth it.

So far I’ve never regretted a block. It hasn’t happened that I’ve met somebody in person and had an awkward moment of “oh, I’ve got your account blocked on [whatever]”. On the other hand, when controversial posts get hundreds of comments, it’s normal that I’m only shown 80-90% of them (when logged in).

Things escalated during the municipal elections, when I ran as candidate for city council. Since I’m openly genderqueer and vegan – two of the most hated demographics – I got… a few hateful private messages. And since then I’ve wondered how many I didn’t get because I had such a long block-list already.

@danso
It's a shame you get any hateful messages at all, DMs or otherwise. I guess I'm fortunate that I haven't really experienced that on the Fediverse, despite my unpopular political views. Possibly part of the reason I haven't made much personal use of blocking is that the admins of my instance keep the nastier stuff away from CoSocialites...

I don't think it's likely you'll regret any of the accounts you block, since I don't see how you'd get feedback suggesting any mistakes.

@danso that's really interesting. Thanks for the thoughts.

@evan

No, but sometimes I really, really want to do it anyway.

@evan Block and Mute are like Bubble Tape™ bubble gum: For you. Not them.
@evan I'd say no. I don't want to know if I've been blocked. I'm not for everyone and i know that, but if I'm not for you, I don't need to know about it. Just block and move on. It's not like the other person can stop you from blocking them anyway, so just do it and don't be passive aggressive. I might tell someone else "Oh I have that person blocked," but never directly saying to that person "I am blocking you."

@evan i block/mute a lot of people for being russian or sometimes pro-trump/trump-like entities in other countries, and in that case i usually leave a snarky remark after blocking as a public post

but mostly not

@evan "no, but" sometimes I can't help myself 🤭
@evan
Yes, generally because it's a learning opportunity. If not for them, then for others.
But... if muting a person who isn't a troll, but just too much, then quietly muting is kinder
@evan If you block them, they don't see your message do they?
@PatrickoftheG @evan if your message is public, they could see it if they log out, or they might see it between when you post the message and when you block them. Otherwise, it's like, to quote Douglas Adams, "saying 'And another thing...' twenty minutes after admitting [you'd] lost the argument."
@Centretowner @evan L'esprit de l'escalier made manifest.
@evan Why start drama neither of you need by announcing it?

@evan I think it's polite to either tell a mutual they are being muted (if you are muting their @ responses too), or just soft block them (force them to unfollow you)

Either of those at least give them a hint something is up.

I don't think it's as big a deal for non mutuals

@evan No, unless you want to.
@evan @zotheca I seldom block someone. The better way is muting for some time which you can set in that case. So no need to tell.

@juergen It depends. The other person won't even notice the mute. That means they're writing for nothing. Since the other person isn't a bad person or an enemy, they have a right not to have their time wasted. That's why I'd rather block them.

@evan

@evan No, just do it. I do wish there was a convention around mutual muting, which is really mutual unfollowing. That is, a way to virtually shake hands and convey to each other that there’s still mutual respect, but you’ve both moved on from each other and maybe we’ll see each other in the reposts.
@evan
i think we should receive notifications on being blocked/muted. takes away the obligation or choice from the blocker/muter but promotes transparency or clarity for the account that gets blocked/muted

@evan Ideally the person you block should be told why so the person knows what his/her behaviour/posts caused it.

But there are cases where it isn't worth telling the person.

@evan “No” means “not unless I feel like burning needless psychic energy on being conspicuously self-righteous”
@evan Block: yes, when my reasons are worth sharing, based on egregious misbehaviour of the person I decided to block. Meant to warn my followers and friends. Mute: no, that’s a personal decision most of the time.
@evan I usually only mute people, so they still can react and discuss my posts with other people. But I don't have to. That is only a way for me to curate my feed - not a comment on their person.

@evan Telling someone, he/she/... was blocked is, as far as I know, unnecessary because the person can see, they are blocked.

Not, however, when they are muted. In fact, I retrospectively have only chosen to mute instead to block, so no information is conveyed. The fascist, racist or annoying bot should not be given any information about my status of engagement. The best thing to do, for me, is to mute. 

@evan no, the block or mute button is there so you can curate your online experience, however that looks for you. unless you're close friends with someone you want to mute/block (and if so, you really do need a conversation, for the sake of the friendship), I don't see any reason to mention it to anyone unless it comes up in conversation.
@evan while it’s normally good form to do so, I said no. I don’t think the default position should be that blocking or muting someone is personal. Maybe a mutual is really into elephants, and I had a bad experience with one and don’t want to be reminded. I shouldn’t need to explain my backstory to establish a boundary.

@evan I was responsible for how block and mute work on Twitter. Ideally, these are two separate tools with different functionality.

Block intentionally lets the blocker know that they’ve been blocked (when they try more interaction with you). It also stops syndicating your posts to them, hides your stuff from them, and removes you from their lists.

Mute came later and the main difference is that mute doesn’t let the mutee know that they are muted. It is you controlling your frame.

@evan ah… should YOU tell them? The situations where these apply are endless and varied. Choose ur own adventure. (A one size fits all rule doesn’t seem like it could work here.)
Poll FAQ

I do a lot of polls on my account on the Fediverse. I get the same questions or requests multiple times, so I made this FAQ to make it easier to reply. Q: Why do you do so many polls? A: I like to …

Evan Prodromou's Blog
@evan it is very rare for me to block someone, so yes, any relationship has become so degraded that block is almost certainly with no communication

@evan No, but you could

It'd be kinda funny

Like what are they gonna do? Argue with you more? They're muted

@evan I don't, because muting someone for me is "hello, I'd like to not interact anymore" and so that little bit of extra interaction is not something I'm looking to do

But if I were in a petty enough mood, maybe

@evan Actually, I think I did this to some AI porn site's account so there's that
@evan voted yes , although I had this weird experience where I said I was going to mute folks who talk about the horrible worldwide politics so I could focus on the only work I know how to do, and someone got snarky and aggressive who did not even follow me nor did I follow them. 🤦
https://sfba.social/@FinchHaven/116155141897314764
So strange.
FinchHaven sfba (@[email protected])

Content warning: uspol & USA war-waging

SFBA.social
@evan I often get followed by men who have zero or 1 toot here and who only follow women. I think that's weird and so I block or mute them.