New podcast episode: Put some privacy in your smartphone! 📣 🎧

How can you use an Android smartphone while protecting your privacy? Who should you turn to for more privacy-friendly Android alternatives?
Can you install Linux on your phone?

With @fla from @Framasoft , we answer these questions!

👉 https://www.projets-libres.org/en/podcast/smartphone-put-privacy-in-your-smartphone/

#podcast #opensource #privacy #eos #iodeOS #calyxos #postmarketos #fairphone #commown #murena #ubuntutouch #grapheneos

@projetslibres_podcast @fla @Framasoft Every product mentioned here but GrapheneOS is highly insecure, Postmarket and Ubuntu Touch are based on GNU/Linux, which lacks of many modern hardens, such as memory safety, application sandbox and verified boot.

Btw Android is a Linux distro.

CalyxOS, /e/OS and iodeOS are outdated in security patches and major AOSP releases. They also contain non-free privileged Google binaries.

https://privsec.dev/posts/linux/linux-insecurities/

https://xcancel.com/search?f=tweets&q=from%3AGrapheneOS+Linux

Linux Insecurities

There is a common misconception among privacy communities that Linux is one of the more secure operating systems, either because it is open-source or because it is widely used in the cloud. However, this is a far cry from reality. There is already a very in-depth technical blog explaining the various security weaknesses of Linux by Madaidan, Whonix’s Security Researcher. This page will attempt to address some of the questions commonly raised in reaction to his blog post.

@a53bdb @projetslibres_podcast @fla @Framasoft this is fake information you are trying to push, Calyx I will not answer as the project is on old, but for the others they provide all of the updates if the Android and Chromium security chanel and maintain up to date the apps as long as security is concerned. GrapheneOS FUD will not change how popular the others projects are and GrapheneOS just cannot compete as they only work on Pixel phones, and only as long as Google is helping.
@a53bdb @projetslibres_podcast @fla @Framasoft on the other side you have /e/OS and IodéOS who can work on old pixel and on non Google hardware, they should just stopping attacking and FUD others projects if they what to be integrated in the others communities.
Same advice for you.
@lajuste @projetslibres_podcast @fla @Framasoft If /e/OS and iodeOS want to join real privacy community, they should make something useful and stop attacking GrapheneOS. Same advice for you.

@a53bdb @projetslibres_podcast @fla @Framasoft look at how many time they talk about GrapheneOS and attack it, and now do the same and count how many time GrapheneOS account (who hides Daniel Micay) is mentioning others projects to attack them.

/e/OS, iodéOS, CalyxOS, LineageOS, PostmarketOS, UBtouch, microG and many other projects don't give a fuck about Graphene, but sometimes they have to answer critics and Micay answer again with a 10 post attack.

@a53bdb @projetslibres_podcast @fla @Framasoft it make people talk about Graphene yes, but also the others ROM and as any critics of Graphene leads you to harassment, no debate is possible, it burn the public image of #GrapheneOS for most of the people ban by Micay.
@lajuste @projetslibres_podcast @fla @Framasoft Why is it that when others spread lies about privacy and security, GrapheneOS is not allowed to debunk? When GrapheneOS criticizes others with evidence, it is called attacking?