#Guitar #GearSquad #MusicProduction
@GuitarSith
You might not remember this but in the mid '80s Gibson tried to make a Les Paul "Lite" it still had a carved top, so not a Special. I don't remeber what they called it but from the front it looked the same, but it was considerably thinner and the body was chambered so it was a lot lighter. They put slightly hotter pickups in it to compensate for the reduced mass.
I thought it was BRILLIANT. I thought they played and sounded great. Les Paul lovers HATED it.
1/2
I think Heritage did it first and then Gibson jumped on. They ended up selling them a closeout prices because they were so univerally hated. They were trying to get down to Superstrat weight.
I play acoustics most of the time now, but when I play an electric I want it to be light. Like Danelectro light.
2/2
@geos
I’ve always been more of a traditionalist, I had a 1978ish Les Paul that I loved. About 9 pounds, so not thin or overly chambered. It was stolen in 1985 so I quit. April was my replacement for that guitar, probably around 9 pounds as well. My customer shop ‘59 is about 11 pounds.
Chambering of guitars has changed a lot over the years. Here’s a link to the techniques Gibson has used.
https://gearaficionado.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Gibson-weight-relief.jpg