Gaël Duval is the founder and president of the /e/ foundation along with the CEO of Murena. Duval and his organizations have consistently taken a stance against protecting users from exploits. In this video, he once again claims protecting against exploits is for only useful pedophiles and spies.

Translation to English:

> There's the attack surface, on that front we're not security specialists here, so I couldn't answer you precisely, but from the discussions I've had, it seems that everything

> we do reduces attack surface. However, we don't have a "hardened security" approach, we aren't developing a phone for pedo(censored) so they can evade justice. So there aren't difficult things to check if the memory is corrupted, really hardened security stuff that could clearly be useful for executives, in the secret service, or whatever. That's not our goal, our goal is to start from an observation: today our personal data is constantly being plundered and that wouldn't be legal in real life
> with the mail or the telephone, we want to change that. So we are making you a product that changes that by default for anyone.

Transcription in French:

> Il y a la surface d'attaque, là pour le coup on est pas des spécialistes de la sécurité, donc je ne pourrais pas te répondre avec précision, mais des discussions que j'ai eu, il semblerait que tout ce qu'on fait, ça réduit la surface d'attaque. Donc oui, probablement ça aide. Par contre, on a pas une approche "sécurité durcie", on développe pas un téléphone pour les pédo(bip) pour qu'ils puissent échapper à la justice. Donc il y a pas des trucs pas possibles pour voir

> si la mémoire est pas corrompue, des trucs de sécu vraiment durcis qui pourraient être utiles clairement pour des dirigeants, dans les services secrets ou que sais-je. C'est pas notre but, notre but c'est de partir d'un constat, aujourd'hui nos données personnelles sont pillées en permanence et ça serait pas légal dans la vraie vie avec le courrier ou le téléphone, on veut changer ça. Donc on vous fait un produit qui change ça par défaut pour n'importe quelle personne.
GrapheneOS exists to protect users from having their privacy invaded by arbitrary individuals, corporations and states. Privacy depends on security. GrapheneOS heavily improves both privacy and security while providing a high level of usability and near perfect app compatibility.
/e/ has far worse privacy and security than the Android Open Source Project. They fail to keep up with important standard privacy and security patches for Android, Linux, firmware, drivers and HALs. They fail to provide current generation Android privacy and security protections.
For years, Gaël Duval has spearheaded a campaign to misrepresent GrapheneOS as not being usable, not compatible with apps and only useful to a tiny minority of people. He has repeatedly claimed GrapheneOS is for pedophiles, criminals and spies while claiming /e/ is for everyone.
It's hardly only GrapheneOS focusing on protecting users against exploits. Apple and Google have put a ton of work into it. Apple heavily focuses on privacy and security. That includes protecting against remote exploits, local exploits from compromised apps and data extraction.
GrapheneOS and iOS are both heavily focused on privacy and security. Both are gradually adding much stronger protections against apps/sites scraping data, coercion users into giving data via alternatives with case-by-case consent and increasingly strong exploit protections.
/e/ is far weaker in all of these areas compared to the standard Android Open Source Project on secure hardware. It doesn't keep up with standards updates and protections. It adds tons of low security attack surface and privacy invasive services. It's not in the same space as us.
/e/ and Murena devices are far worse for privacy and security than an iPhone. It's trivial to break into their devices remotely or extract data from them compared to an iPhone. They have weaker privacy protections from apps too. Their main approach to privacy is a DNS blocklist.
Their DNS blocklist can only block domains not used for useful functionality to avoid ruining usability. Meanwhile, the most privacy invasive behavior by apps is rarely ever split out into separate domains. Even for those, apps and websites can trivially evade DNS blocklists.
It's common for apps and websites to do everything through their own servers. That's best practice to avoid leaking API keys. It's increasingly common for invasive libraries to use hard-wired IPs and/or DNS-over-HTTPS to evade blocking. DNS filtering is increasingly less useful.
Murena is a for-profit company owned by shareholders including Gaël Duval. /e/ has a non-profit organization which is also led by Gaël Duval. /e/ includes paid services from Murena. /e/ very clearly exists to build products for Murena to sell in order to enrich the shareholders.
Despite being done for profit, /e/ receives millions of euros in funding from the EU on an ongoing basis. /e/ and Murena use extraordinarily inaccurate marketing to not only promote their products/services but also to mislead people about GrapheneOS and scare them away from it.
Recently, France's national law enforcement began fearmongering about GrapheneOS and smearing it with inaccurate claims. France's corporate and state media heavily participated. Many articles and also radio/television coverage misrepresented GrapheneOS as being for criminals.
Across French corporate and state media covering it, inaccurate claims by the state about features, distribution and marketing of GrapheneOS were wrongly presented as fact. Most of them didn't contact us and we weren't shown what was being claimed so we could properly respond.
Téléphones protégés utilisés par les narcotrafiquants : « Rien n’est inviolable ! »

Les téléphones Google Pixel équipés du système d’exploitation GrapheneOS permettent à des criminels de dissimuler leurs échanges. Johanna Brousse, magistrate spécialisée dans la lutte contre la cybercriminalité, explique quels sont les moyens de la justice pour contourner ce type d’outils.

Le Parisien
/e/ and Murena are based in France. They've been pushing false narratives about GrapheneOS falsely claiming it isn't usable by regular people and doesn't benefit them for years. Duval has been making the ludicrous claim GrapheneOS is only useful to criminals and spies for years.
/e/ and Murena aren't on the same side as GrapheneOS. They're charlatans selling devices with poor privacy and atrocious security to earn money. They've spent years trying to undermine a legitimate privacy project and heavily use the same talking points as police state advocates.
Their marketing heavily focuses on avoiding Google and gives the impression they believe privacy means avoiding one company. Meanwhile, they add a bunch of Google services not present in the Android Open Source Project and give extensive privileged access to Google apps/services.

/e/ and Murena have their own privacy invasive behavior in their apps and services. One particularly egregious example is their supposedly private speech-to-text service sending user data to OpenAI without consent instead of doing most locally like Apple:

https://community.e.foundation/t/voice-to-text-feature-using-open-ai/70509

Voice to Text feature using Open AI

Thank you a lot for your positive and supporting comments about our new /e/OS Voice-to-text! Regarding its implementation in /e/OS, I’d like to explain a few things to explain why we have chosen an OpenAI STT API to implement it and how it’s going to evolve in the future: What we have learned from our experimentations with STT models that run locally on the smartphone for speech recognition: they work quite poorly, they make a lot of mistakes in voice recognition they are not able to mix la...

/e/OS community
/e/ and Murena have repeatedly claimed GrapheneOS is for drug dealers, pedophiles, terrorists and spies. /e/ and Murena are anti-privacy. They're heavily profiting from marketing products as private but don't believe in it. /e/ is an authoritarian-aligned fake privacy project.
France is the most anti-encryption, anti-privacy and anti-security country in the EU. They've been doing a gradual crackdown on open source privacy projects including GrapheneOS and Signal with escalating smears and threats. /e/ and Murena are on the side of the police state.
That interview is not Gaël Duval misspeaking but rather he's expressing views we've seen him communicate in written form many times before. He has repeatedly misled people about what GrapheneOS provides and claimed it's only useful to criminals. He supported those media attacks.
Gaël Duval has repeatedly spread harassment content targeting our team with fabricated stories and bullying. Perhaps all of this is because he wants to maximize profits for Murena, but how is he going to achieve that by claiming serious privacy and security is for pedophiles?

Here's a paywall bypass for the 2 paywalled articles above:

https://archive.is/UrlvK

https://archive.is/AhMsj

These are among the most egregious cases of France's corporate and state media presenting highly inaccurate state smearing of GrapheneOS as fact but there's much more.

@GrapheneOS is there a good English translation?

@GrapheneOS And this thing is old, for example, back when the first versions of Firefox were released, France had demanded versions of Firefox with significantly reduced security to allow law enforcement agencies to take remote control of it. I didn’t know about it at the time; I was too young, but I know it happened.

During the gradual transition to encrypting the web, France was reluctant and initially wanted to limit encryption to states websites and banks.

Surveillance by the French government has taken an even more aggressive turn since 2015, following the Charlie Hebdo attacks.

The GDPR has so far proven ineffective, and it is mainly due to the censorship and decisions of the Constitutional Council and the Court of Justice of the European Union that the French government is prevented from going further than it would like, but every year, it tries to circumvent these decisions.

@GrapheneOS
To be fair, Signal lies about their actual security, particularly regarding metadata protection.

https://passthesalt.ubicast.tv/videos/metadata-protection-in-instant-messaging-applications-a-review/#share

Olvid, a French IM, arguably offers better privacy than Signal, by design. But they are French, so I don't trust them either for the reasons you listed in this thread.

@simplex is way ahead of Signal and Olvid, privacy/security-wise.

Metadata Protection in Instant Messaging Applications: a Review

Pass the SALT Archives
@Andromxda I am the author of the publication I linked in my previous post. I am not affiliated with the French government. I worked for the French gov between 2013 and 2018. We parted ways in terrible terms.

@GrapheneOS

30(-ish) toots yesterday and today on /e/. Have you considered increasing the character limit per toot? Perhaps one longer toot (let's say, 1500 characters? 3000?) could summarise all your views on this topic?

@jon_bon Why doesn't Mastodon provide configuration for character limit through the configuration file? If it provided it, we would increase the limit to a much larger value. Since it doesn't, we're not currently doing it. We don't really want to have to patch each release of Mastodon and make sure we don't miss any new places they reference the hard-wired value of 500. We could do that but we prefer using the unmodified package which is why we haven't done it yet.
@GrapheneOS alo they arrested Pavel Durov, just to add insult to injury.
@GrapheneOS
In a world of corporate and state over reach, anyone wanting privacy is the enemy.
@codimp je n'ai trouvé aucune source à ce sujet, ça a été répété par le gars de GOS, mais comme d'hab dans ses attaques gratuites contre le reste du monde (Lineage, MicroG, Murena, F-Droid, etc.) il faut le croire sur parole, et si tu insiste il dis que tu fait partie d'une cabale qui le harcèle :-/
GrapheneOS (@[email protected])

Attached: 1 video Gaël Duval is the founder and president of the /e/ foundation along with the CEO of Murena. Duval and his organizations have consistently taken a stance against protecting users from exploits. In this video, he once again claims protecting against exploits is for only useful pedophiles and spies. Translation to English: > There's the attack surface, on that front we're not security specialists here, so I couldn't answer you precisely, but from the discussions I've had, it seems that everything

GrapheneOS Mastodon

@GrapheneOS > /e/ and Murena have repeatedly claimed GrapheneOS is for drug dealers, pedophiles, terrorists and spies

Wow, they used the old tired canard practically verbatim. How pathetic.

Four Horsemen of the Infocalypse - Wikipedia

@GrapheneOS Can't wait for your Motorola partnership to further legitimize GrapheneOS.
@mast0d0nphan @GrapheneOS is this real? Do you know when?

@luckychronic @GrapheneOS https://motorolanews.com/motorola-three-new-b2b-solutions-at-mwc-2026/

They haven't announced the release date nor the phones that are getting GrapheneOS, only the partnership for now.

Motorola News | Motorola's new partnership with GrapheneOS

Motorola announces three new B2B solutions at MWC 2026, including GrapheneOS partnership, Moto Analytics and more.

Global Blog
@mast0d0nphan @luckychronic We've said it should be in 2027 and likely not near the start of the year.

@GrapheneOS Le Parisien :

"Ces engins jusqu’à présent inviolés, qui protègent les communications et qui ne partagent pas les données sur les serveurs, sont un nouveau défi que le parquet cyber entend bientôt relever."

C'est exactement pareil avec Signal sur Android si on n'utilise pas le cloud, ils nous prennent pour des imbéciles.

@davep @GrapheneOS Hahaha, furthermore, this false claim makes no sense: GrapheneOS does not route user communications through these servers; GrapheneOS is not a company and does not offer services such as messaging or email etc.

@GrapheneOS

The article is behind a paywall...

@claude_champagne Here's a paywall bypass for the 2 paywalled articles above:

https://archive.is/UrlvK

https://archive.is/AhMsj

The third one doesn't have a paywall and there are many more similar articles across other sites. We didn't want to link the ones where our team was personally targeted by a tech news site heavily misrepresenting our statements and adding up the total amount of tweets we posted over a week mainly as replies to questions to misrepresent as being on our main timeline.

@GrapheneOS

Thank you.

Stupid articles...

Keep up the good work! ✊

@claude_champagne @GrapheneOS Man, am I glad that I went for GrapheneOS. I also briefly considered /e/, but luckily, it was easy enough to make an informed decision after a few web searches. GrapheneOS is awesome!

@GrapheneOS This is clearly a smear campaign against the project.

Is there any chance this could seriously harm the project to the point of affecting the partnership with Motorola?

@GrapheneOS thats how you know you are doing something right
@GrapheneOS I boosted this out of sympathy, but are there public sources for these statements?
@joe_vinegar Nope, GOS social account has been attacking other projects without providing any sources for years. And if you try to ask, they'll tell you to do your own research, or that you are part of a conspiracy… This is sad really.

@bohwaz @joe_vinegar Ehm, the thread literally starts with a video? It's pretty clear who they are attacking.

Why are you defending a company that says "security is only for pedophiles and spies"?

@danieldk
I am not defending what they said. The video doesn't mention gos at all.
@joe_vinegar

@bohwaz @joe_vinegar Ok, I think we can at least agree that Gael Duval's statement implies that phones that do security hardening are for criminals and spies?

Now, next, which serious projects (not snake-oil security phone companies) focus on phone hardening?

So, in what way is he not attacking @GrapheneOS ?

(Perhaps ironically, he is also attacking iOS and Pixel OS, but that will whoosh past his audience, since most people do not know about Apple/Google's hardening efforts).

@bohwaz @joe_vinegar @GrapheneOS Put differently, he is using the "think of the children"-argument to attack anyone who has better privacy and security than them.

This effort to make security and privacy suspect puts them really in the same camp as the people using similar arguments for Chat Control, weakening cryptography, mandatory age verification, etc. They are amplifying this "security is only for bad people"-narrative.

Murena is *not* a privacy company.

@danieldk @bohwaz @joe_vinegar @GrapheneOS e-x-a-c-t-e-m-e-n-t. Well said.
@wa__em @danieldk @[email protected] @joe_vinegar Gael Duval didn't say this as a one-off statement in that interview on video. He has repeatedly specifically claimed GrapheneOS is only useful for pedophiles, criminals and spies in his posts across platforms. It's something he has said many times. Duval didn't specifically say he was talking about GrapheneOS in that video clip but he definitely has elsewhere. It's typical for people to lie about what we've said and pretend stuff which has happened hasn't.
@wa__em @danieldk @joe_vinegar We can extend our thread with archive links to statements by Duval attacking GrapheneOS and dismissing the privacy and security protections it provides in the same way. The people committed to attacking and undermining GrapheneOS including attacks on our team members with personal insults and fabrications will continue doing so. There's no point in trying to satisfy people who will keep moving the goalposts and claim we haven't provided evidence when we have.
@GrapheneOS
they dont like free competiting with their paid services/products?

@GrapheneOS

"And, my friends, in this story you have a history of this entire movement. First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. And then they attack you and want to burn you. And then they build monuments to you." - Nicholas Klein, trade union attorney (1918) [Often attributed to Schopenhauer 1819, or Gandhi 1920]

@GrapheneOS What's a more solid solution for blocking ads/trackers than DNS filtering?
@tedstechtips @GrapheneOS
Probably a local MitM (e.g. AdGuard), but that increases attack surface a lot