Yall in the replys act as if criticizing gnome is out of the question chill we do things open source so we can criticize and fork. Also most parenting things are just stalkerware this is just gnomes implementation. Basic parenting is being with your kid online and giving them good defaults.
@zaire https://fedi.absturztau.be/objects/f86cea8b-4fd6-4b49-9604-eb179d141dee
Go draw a horse and watch it run - this is the kind of silliness the internet was originally made for ...
Hypocrites.
You built an industry on scraping the internet and now you’re shocked someone scraped you. You normalized the idea that anything publicly accessible is fair game for training. That’s the precedent you set. I don’t want to hear you bitch about it now.
Because it feels like it keeps making us explain over and over our reason for being.
Artists have to explain that it’s not art just because you can generate content without emotion and discomfort.
Writer’s have to explain that it’s not storytelling just because there is content that follows rules without critically exploring the human condition.
Software developers keep having to spend time on code generated in seconds that then needs 10x time to understand and 100x time to debug.
We’re all just spending our energy on one more thing, but it’s automated and shoved down our throats so much we can’t even find the distinction between content and emotion.
@dave I don't know if this would be feasible, but I really really think that "followers only" should not mean "the followers of the account posting" but "the followers of the account posting and those of all accounts named in the post".
Even leaving aside the serious issue of harassment, it would make totally friendly and civil threads that hang off a followers-only top post, into a conversation one's followers could take part in without also following everyone who comments.