Before the 'Oxygen Apocalypse', Earth was purple, the oceans ferrous, and H₂O's oxygen safely locked away 🟣

Then, bacteria developed a quantum lockpick 🗝️⚡

The seas rusted and the ancients died out. Complex organisms burn the fuel of this cataclysm still, but pay the price by ageing 🦠

This is the story of how symmetry saves us from the flames ⚛️

Full post: https://keiran-rowell.github.io/oxygen/2026-04-02-the-oxygen-apocalypse/

#oxygen #science #scicomm #GreatOxidationEvent #photosynthesis #eukaryogenesis #quantumbiology #geology

The Oxygen Apocalypse: how symmetry saves us from the flames

📖 20 min read • Cyanobacteria captured light to break a quantum law, unpicking the electron pair, and extinguished ancient life in the process

Keiran Rowell
@keiran_rowell What appeals to me most in your fascinating article is the idea that symmetry is our shield. Do you think it is possible that one fundamental symmetry underlies all symmetries known to date, which is also our shield?

@quadrants I'm glad it's a compelling opening! I became fascinated by how life was able to flip electron spins (and hence symmetry) in such huge quantities!

Conservation of angular momentum, which forbids singlet-triplet reactions, is a consequence of Emmy Noether's theorem:

If there's a continuously running symmetry in some space—in this case rotational—and no special paths, then quantities are conserved.

Fundamental, but not one single universal symmetry.

The shielding is incidental.

@keiran_rowell I’m familiar with the work of Emmy Noether—she’s one of my favorite scientists, and I think we owe her an enormous amount.

I interpret your point as follows: different symmetries give rise to different conservation laws. At the same time, some symmetries can be broken (symmetry breaking), and at higher energy levels the rules can change.

That suggests that what is “forbidden” in one context may become possible in another—or at least far less strictly constrained.

@quadrants Oh yes precisely! Noether is amazing, and it's so elegant that conservation flows smoothly from symmetries.

Yes, "spin-forbidden" in particular is *exactly* a term that becomes less strictly constrained in some contexts.

Something is introduced that weakens the "law".

Spin-orbit coupling is the main one, and why the Mn-cluster works: the electric field of the metal atoms facilitates the spin-flip.

Here's an actual physics person talking about oxygen:

https://galileo-unbound.blog/tag/spin-orbit-coupling/

Spin-orbit coupling – Galileo Unbound

Posts about Spin-orbit coupling written by David D. Nolte

Galileo Unbound

@quadrants A flame gets around this, not reacting triplet oxygen directly with singlet organic matter. Heat imparts enough energy to split a 2e- bond into two radicals.

Each radical now never formally violates a spin symmetry, so *those* can react pretty smoothly. So, yes the higher energy in the system introduced another way around a 'forbidden' process.

Without any external factor or high energy regime, then the rules would hold.

I know proper physicists look at this for other symmetries!

@keiran_rowell Wow, that’s really cool, Keiran! 🔥 Radical formation is such a clever way for nature to get around the “forbidden” spin rules.

I love how energy can open doors that are otherwise closed—and I’m curious which other symmetries physicists find the most striking!

@keiran_rowell Thanks again for the detailed insights. I really appreciate you taking the time to explain all of this. I need to step away for today, but I’ll definitely keep pondering these sneaky spin flips and check out the links you shared. Looking forward to continuing the geek-out another time!

@quadrants No problem, this is what excites me! :)

Oh yeah, there's lots and lots of physical chemistry research on amazing applications of controlled spin-flips.

What I hope is that this framing will make people think differently about a leaf and what's going on inside it, and what was extinguished along the way 🍃