Democrat strategists
Democrat strategists
Picking a fight with Hasan Piker
Dude is insanely problematic…
Saying the party should toss values aside and just shut up and accept him because he’s twitch famous is fucking wild.
He’s a fucking nepo baby that got famous working for his genocide denying uncle. If he held half the values he claims to, he wouldnt have a multimillion dollar mansion and spend all his time raising his “brand awareness”.
Like, for people who actually listen to this douche, take a second and think about what you hear more about:
The candidate he’s supposed to be helping here
How Hasan is smarter and knows more than any politician
You little fuckers are falling for the same grift boomers did with trump
Normally when someone asks a question, you’re more likely to get your question answered if you answer theirs first.
This is a part of basic social interaction often taught in preschool:
Like, for people who actually listen to this douche, take a second and think about what you hear more about:
The candidate he’s supposed to be helping here
How Hasan is smarter and knows more than any politician
I do want to congratulate you on not using any slurs this time.
Still comes off like how trump supporters talk tho, you’re not fooling anyone.
Charlatan or not
charlatan
the alternative of the charlatan is not good and nothing like mamdani
it’s still fucking stupid to go after a twitch streamer
A candidate invited Hasan to a rally.
A few Dems said that’s not a good idea because he’s not helping candidates, he’s just increasing his own views.
Hasan and his fans never ever mention the candidate Hasan is supposed to be supporting
They change the entire conversation to “Dems don’t like Hasan”.
Do you legitimately not understand this is exactly what people warned about?
Is the twitch brain rot really so bad you can’t realize Hasan is proving everyone right?
A candidate invited Hasan to a rally.
Hasan and his fans never ever mention the candidate Hasan is supposed to be supporting
The candidate is Abdul El-Sayed who is running for Senate in Michigan. Don’t know where you’re getting that Hasan never mentions him, they had a whole interview and Hasan has spoken about him frequently since then.
A few Dems said that’s not a good idea because he’s not helping candidates, he’s just increasing his own views.
Hasan has a large platform that he lends to candidates to give them a boost. I guarantee you more people knew of Hasan Piker than Abdul El-Sayed before his interview. This idea that Hasan is just clout-chasing makes no sense. I don’t align 100% with his worldview but this whole thing is clearly just a smear campaign organised by Third Way because of Hasan’s advocacy for Palestine, opposition to the blockade on Cuba, and his efforts to get progressives elected in Democratic primaries.
Really it’s just a colossal waste of resources. The Gaza flotilla made sense because absolutely zero aid was getting in. With Cuba, there are countless international organizations with already established infrastructure that could use the flotilla funds much, much more efficiently.
Also, wasn’t he only there for two days? He could have done more than just vlog; he could have stayed to hand out cash to the needy in droves, what with him being a millionaire and all.
It felt like a disingenuous clout grab to me.
I wonder, how much does 20 tons do for the people? And the website does not mention plans for another convoy :(
I noticed they brought solar panels with them; that’s what Cuba needs right now. AFAIK, their non-energy imports have not been affected by this new blockade.
I’m any case (tangent), uncritical support of Platner and Bernie are concerns for me. With his influence, he could be pushing for proper progressive candidates. He has so much influence I feel as if he could really set the groundwork for a national movement, and yet he insists on working within the system. Admittedly, I am ignorant on this point, and establishing a proper third party is certainly easier said than done.
Also, I hardly ever watch him. I just know that the moment he sits down with a politician he sucks their dick and never presses them on the issues that supposedly matter most to him (US-Israel relations, US imperialism, &c.).
Nah, there’s a clip of his dog tripping on something and yelping while his hand was in a weird spot and people love to dog pile on him.
It doesn’t help that he has the worst PR instincts when crises happen.
I’m not a fan, but think he’s a net positive. He clearly excuses abuses by China, but also does useful analysis of current events in a historical context with actual analysis usually. It’s not like his community is an echo chamber either, they’re constantly shitting on him and calling him out of things, but as a whole they stick around, listen and get more involved with progressive causes.
I’m in a leftist group that regularly discussed politics. I know one guy who follows him, and regularly talks like this (he’s the biggest happening thing, a huge voice on the left etc)
Noone else thinks about or talks about him. I’m not here to trash on the guy, hes probably fine. It’s more a point about the usefulness of twitch as a political project. It’s a deeply insular place. Much like it’s annoying when people act as though niche twitter stuff is world news
It’s a fair critique. I suppose i dont really know many pundits that aren’t of this type of another.
I suppose I don’t think “pundits” as a concept is really that important to us. It’s like asking what literary critics a writers group talks about a lot, we’re more interested in the politics than talking about the people talking about the people talking about the…
Kinda the whole point is that we want to think about the interesting problems ourselves rather than having other people do it
No kidding!
Some of these comments are unhinged. We’re drowning in a sea of fascism and folks are still doing purity tests and believing BS from right wing sources.
Instead of exploring his relationship with his dog (owner/accessory)
All of this comment points to you needing to gain some emotional maturity. You sound as if you’ve either never owned a dog or have only ever owned already trained dogs.
I can grab a piece of paper loudly and my dog will crumple as if I’ve beaten her every day of her life. Never hit her once. Never shocked her with a collar, only ever used the beeps and vibration. All I need to do is pick up the remote and she will cower. Mind you, I shower this dog with love every day and again — I’ve never once hurt her besides maybe stepping on her tail.
I think you need to exhibit some personal growth here, tbh. If your reasons for disliking Hasan stem from this one incident vs the blatant hypocrisy he’s already shown — you need to rethink some things.
It’s disappointing that you discredit criticism of harm to another living creature while considering materialism like a house a bigger hypocrisy. They’re not mutually exclusive.
And you’re correct, I have never “owned” a dog. I’ve shared my life journey with many, but I didn’t “own” them. They’re not property even if the law and society view them as such. You conditioned your dog to cower at the sight of you picking up a remote? For fuck’s sake, you conditioned your dog to cower at a behavior that resulted in no physical consequence, just the idea it could result in physical consequence. What the fuck is wrong with you!?!