@nasser In fairness, they’re usually trying to take your oil, usually violently.
But yes, getting people to subscribe to cognitive functions they would normally develop themselves is the final frontier for late-stage capitalism.
Same thing happens to Black and Brown people IN America. When white men show up in our neighborhoods talking about “lowering crime”, they’re coming to kill us, predominantly our men
@nasser
Brown or black people dying is just a positive side effect of bringing democracy. The aim is maximising exploitation.
When the people have stuff that rich white men doesn't control, they want to democratise things towards themselves.
@nasser This is genuinely such an acute way to frame the whole thing.
AI coding is just a shitty abstraction layer -- and it only works for solving easy problems, so you eventually paint yourself into a corner when you need to expand your code to do more.
@nasser Yup.
"Democratizing" but it's "giving people who can pay a big magic button to generate code, art or music" instead of "giving people access to the financials and practical means - time, money, tools, materials, whatever -to learn how to code, make art or play music" 😑
@nasser sounds like it's colonising programming, which is quite a good phrase, really.
@nasser @davidgerard if it was “democratising” then presumably the people should have a say in how it’s managed? Welles, we should be able to vote on how we train models and such?
One of the key things it’s doing is saying “all code must now flow through a central corporate gate keeper”.
Can we argue that “privatising” fits better, or some similar word?
Yes
@nasser Yeah, that's how American democracy works.
Also sometimes the person who gets the second-most votes wins.
No, you’re not quite right. Whether you choose to understand how it works is entirely up to you. There are also non-subscription models that you can run on your own hardware, but they’re not yet as good, though catching up.