so just to be totally clear AI is "democratizing" programming by taking something that used to free to do and making it so you pay a subscription fee to an American corporation to do it while being barred from ever actually understanding how it works, am I getting that right?
@nasser @davidgerard if it was “democratising” then presumably the people should have a say in how it’s managed? Welles, we should be able to vote on how we train models and such?
One of the key things it’s doing is saying “all code must now flow through a central corporate gate keeper”.
Can we argue that “privatising” fits better, or some similar word?