@nasser In fairness, they’re usually trying to take your oil, usually violently.
But yes, getting people to subscribe to cognitive functions they would normally develop themselves is the final frontier for late-stage capitalism.
@nasser This is genuinely such an acute way to frame the whole thing.
AI coding is just a shitty abstraction layer -- and it only works for solving easy problems, so you eventually paint yourself into a corner when you need to expand your code to do more.
@nasser Yup.
"Democratizing" but it's "giving people who can pay a big magic button to generate code, art or music" instead of "giving people access to the financials and practical means - time, money, tools, materials, whatever -to learn how to code, make art or play music" 😑
@nasser sounds like it's colonising programming, which is quite a good phrase, really.
@nasser @davidgerard if it was “democratising” then presumably the people should have a say in how it’s managed? Welles, we should be able to vote on how we train models and such?
One of the key things it’s doing is saying “all code must now flow through a central corporate gate keeper”.
Can we argue that “privatising” fits better, or some similar word?
Yes