so just to be totally clear AI is "democratizing" programming by taking something that used to free to do and making it so you pay a subscription fee to an American corporation to do it while being barred from ever actually understanding how it works, am I getting that right?
take it from me, an Arab from Arabia: when white men talk about bringing you "democracy" they're probably trying to kill you
@nasser In this sense “AI” actually is the purest distillation so far of “democratization”, aka “stealing everything of yours that isn’t nailed down, selling it back to you (or, ideally, renting it back for as long as possible), *then* killing you”
@nasser as an Iranian, I agree

@nasser In fairness, they’re usually trying to take your oil, usually violently.

But yes, getting people to subscribe to cognitive functions they would normally develop themselves is the final frontier for late-stage capitalism.

@nasser AI is hard at work democratizing Iran, or so I hear... 😖
@nasser I think they were meaning to write Domesticating, common error!

@nasser This is genuinely such an acute way to frame the whole thing.

AI coding is just a shitty abstraction layer -- and it only works for solving easy problems, so you eventually paint yourself into a corner when you need to expand your code to do more.

@nasser and i'm pretty sure one day there will be restrictions on what code your are allowed to write. i remember listening to a fascnating documentary on french radio where a guy saved hundreds of lives during WWII by making false identity papers. (i'm not sure of my translation of "faux papiers" ^^).
let's try to do that with AI next time it could save lives 🤡
@maxime_andre @nasser I mean, the war on general purpose computing is already in full swing.
@maxime_andre @nasser there was also a group working with population data, that slow played all their work so they could find the records of jewish citizens and destroy them before they got handed over. they all landed in front of the firing squad
@nasser knowledge as a service :(
@nasser I wish I could make my brethren really understand this particular sentiment, if nothing else about LLM usage, and the logical conclusions that follow.
@nasser Kill AI it now before it is too late. It may be artificial but it certainly isn't intelligent.
@nasser it’s also an attack on academia. capital has gained too much power for its own good.

@nasser Yup.

"Democratizing" but it's "giving people who can pay a big magic button to generate code, art or music" instead of "giving people access to the financials and practical means - time, money, tools, materials, whatever -to learn how to code, make art or play music" 😑

@nasser AI solves coding in the same manner public writers solved illiteracy.

@nasser sounds like it's colonising programming, which is quite a good phrase, really.

@davidgerard

@nasser Isn't that how our democracy works now?

@nasser @davidgerard if it was “democratising” then presumably the people should have a say in how it’s managed? Welles, we should be able to vote on how we train models and such?

One of the key things it’s doing is saying “all code must now flow through a central corporate gate keeper”.

Can we argue that “privatising” fits better, or some similar word?

@nasser AI is another tool for oppression. It allows the rich to compensate for being talentless losers by stealing from people so they don't have to pay them
@nasser Hey, just like Elon Musk "democratized" Twitter verification by making you pay for it (and it doesn't actually verify anything anymore).
@nasser I didn't think of it that way .... but yikes. You're right.