So who has tanks there?
@darkerknight @Bellingcat Well reading the article, and you should, it would probably be better to call them anti vehicle mines. As in they have a magentic field sensor, similar to what we see in the US at stop lights, and the movement of a vehicle over it disturbs the sensor and it detonates. Driving a explosively formed penetrator upwards and through 70mm of armor.
Now there are no tanks at this Missile City, thatbI know of but large Ballistic Missile Transporter Errector Launcers (TEL).
1/
@darkerknight @Bellingcat So if you look at the first image in the Bellingcat article you can see the approaches to the "Missile city", a hollowed out mountian with TELs like above, are being mined in the village it passes through to slow their ability to deploy and launch from sites nearby the "city".
This deployment is indiscriminate and dangerous to civilians but doean't seem deliberately targeted at them, yet.
that's what a terrorist organization would do.
and a terrorist organization is exactly what the US is.
a terrorist org so rich and powerful very few people go on record calling them what they really are.
@djsf @Bellingcat
America never signed the Ottawa treaty.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottawa_Treaty
And that is only for anti-personnel mines.
Trump never learned the lessons of the Vietnam War since he weaseled his way out of it. You'd think he would have made it count, his life being spared and all, but no. He didn't even stop to consider for a moment that he should try to understand what went wrong there. When they talk about taking America back, they're talking about taking Americans back to a time where they didn't loudly criticize wars.
came to type this, i see you got there first
@Bellingcat the problem with landmines is that they work really well. In this case making supporting that missile site a nightmare.
🎵 Some of these nation states are not like the others 🎶
From Wikipedia: