@Em0nM4stodon @josephcox @brucelawson
I'm.... I am really out of words...
@wtrmt @josephcox @brucelawson Most privacy laws require to place an official complaint for enforcement at the individual level.
Anyone who had their data collected by a third-party like this without prior notification and consent, and has a local privacy law protecting against this, can likely place a complaint. It's often very easy to do.
Here's a short guide I wrote to help with this: https://www.privacyguides.org/en/activism/toolbox/tip-report-privacy-violations/
@josephcox the weirdest thing about this is that there is, for sure!, an audience for these podcasts somewhere out there.
Someone is devouring the recordings of your meetings that should have been emails, at 3 A.M., while staring directly into the void.
So, anybody can spy on a Zoom meeting, even private ?
@tanavit private meetings aren't impacted
All the people I talked to who found their Zoom meetings on WebinarTV did not use strict privacy settings, and shared links to the meeting because they invited a large number of people to attend.
Thanks.
@iampytest1 @tanavit I'm not so sure.
The article links to this CyberAlberta report, which suggests that some Zoom links are obtained through browser extensions related to calendar and AI transcription. It implies that the recording is made by an agent that attends the Zoom call separately, but I don't see it ruled out that the recording could be made by a compromised extension by a legitimate attendee (it doesn't use Zoom's meeting recording tools).
https://cyberalberta.ca/zooming-out-webinartvs-rampant-scraping-of-online-meetings
@ppatel
Zoom has a reCAPTCHA v3 based option that can be enabled to help protect against this sort of thing. I don't know how effective it is in practice against WebinarTV.