Huh. I’m starting to see some publishing-adjacent folks who were all hot to jump on the “AI” slopwagon apparently having second thoughts.
Interesting.
Huh. I’m starting to see some publishing-adjacent folks who were all hot to jump on the “AI” slopwagon apparently having second thoughts.
Interesting.
@lilithsaintcrow @wordshaper The "quantum" grift failed to launch back around 2004, if memory serves, but it's been bubbling under ever since.
Given the current focus on LLMs I reckon the next bubble could well be quantum machine learning, which crosses the streams:
@dtl @tsturm @lilithsaintcrow @wordshaper NFTs of quantum large language models on the blockchain, hosted on orbital data centers for efficient cooling!
I know, I know, SOMEONE will pay me money for it.
@tsturm @cstross @lilithsaintcrow @wordshaper
Cold fusion powered Quantum Large Language Models on the Blockchain IN SPACE
Quantum computing is as real as quantum mechanics and so is the vulnerability to have the name stolen by charlatans.
(On a side note, it has been some time that I don't get quantum pseudoscientific trash on my feeds ... But perhaps because I kept these scammers/crackpots out of my personal bubble)
@vonubelgarten @lilithsaintcrow @wordshaper
Yes, quantum computing is real—but so far it's also useless for any practical purpose (hey, you want to find the longest common prime factors of 31? Break a leg!).
So anyone touting for investment who promises useful results, let alone quantum supremacy, is almost certainly a charlatan. Unless they admit they're still doing basic engineering R&D. In which case the vultures like a16z will give them a wide berth.