Last month I was trying to unstick a WCAG issue on contrast for disabled controls,where I was fine with disabled buttons passing 1.4.3:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/4874#issuecomment-3929263408
Today, someone is trying to unstick low-contrast disabled buttons being ok (via @SteveFaulkner):
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/922
#WCAG #accessibility #a11y
Does the SC 1.4.3 Contrast minium exception apply to text outside a disabled control? · Issue #4874 · w3c/wcag
For the "Text or images of text that are part of an inactive user interface component" exception for WCAG 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum), does the exception apply to the label for a control when it is ou...
@aardrian @SteveFaulkner you may also like (currently gathering these into a "work packet" for WCAG 2 TF):
* Proposed definition for Inactive https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1154 (stuck on focusability of inactive components)
* Do we need to clarify inactive user interface component https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/636 (resolved by previous?)
* Clarification on the meaning of "disabled" and "turn off" https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/1480
* Contrast minimum: Address the active (pressed) state https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4127
Proposed definition for "inactive" by awkawk · Pull Request #1154 · w3c/wcag
Context: https://www.w3.org/2020/06/09-ag-minutes#item07
Survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/2020-05-cwa/results#x302
Closes #636
Preview | Diff
Adrian Roselli, pH0
Patrick H. Lauke