Mike[TM]Smith AKA Sideshowbarker – fireside
talking #WebStandards #W3C #Browsers #HTML #ARIA #Japan #politics
https://html5accessibility.com/stuff/2026/03/29/miketmsmith-aka-sideshowbarker-fireside/
| Blog | https://html5accessibility.com/stuff/ |
| Shop | https://www.etsy.com/uk/shop/HTMLZ |
| Github | https://github.com/stevefaulkner |
| Resumé | https://cdpn.io/stevef/debug/dyGeywr |
Mike[TM]Smith AKA Sideshowbarker – fireside
talking #WebStandards #W3C #Browsers #HTML #ARIA #Japan #politics
https://html5accessibility.com/stuff/2026/03/29/miketmsmith-aka-sideshowbarker-fireside/
image of text passes or fails WCAG?
image of text passes or fails WCAG?
The Shaggs

Often completely out of tune and rarely in time, the group of sisters forced to play together by their father gained an army of fans from Frank Zappa to Kurt Cobain. A new documentary celebrates their cult status
Calling all #accessibility and #inclusiveDesign folks...
Have a great idea for a talk? Our call for presentations is now open! (closes 31 May 2026) #id24
https://inclusivedesign24.org/2026/
Note: as we're a global event, we're happy to accept submissions for talks in languages other than English.
Understanding Fucking WCAG
i love when somebody asks "surely this normative definition/wording doesn't mean what it says on the surface?"
and you go in and try to give the original writers the benefit of the doubt and say "nah, it's probably just awkwardly phrased...the logical interpretation is this" ...
and then one of the original writers comes in and says "nope, we meant it exactly like that, even though it's illogical" ...
every. single. time.

Hello, I have always considered "standard" text in images as being covered by SC 1.4.5, but I think I might be wrong... The definition of "images of text" is: "text that has been rendered in a non-...
Understanding Fucking WCAG