Adrian Roselli, pH0

Last month I was trying to unstick a WCAG issue on contrast for disabled controls,where I was fine with disabled buttons passing 1.4.3:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/4874#issuecomment-3929263408

Today, someone is trying to unstick low-contrast disabled buttons being ok (via @SteveFaulkner):
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/922

#WCAG #accessibility #a11y

Does the SC 1.4.3 Contrast minium exception apply to text outside a disabled control? · Issue #4874 · w3c/wcag

For the "Text or images of text that are part of an inactive user interface component" exception for WCAG 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum), does the exception apply to the label for a control when it is ou...

GitHub
Mar 18 at 5:11pmWeb
Show threadPatrick H. Lauke6d ago

@aardrian @SteveFaulkner you may also like (currently gathering these into a "work packet" for WCAG 2 TF):

* Proposed definition for Inactive https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1154 (stuck on focusability of inactive components)
* Do we need to clarify inactive user interface component https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/636 (resolved by previous?)
* Clarification on the meaning of "disabled" and "turn off" https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/1480
* Contrast minimum: Address the active (pressed) state https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4127

Proposed definition for "inactive" by awkawk · Pull Request #1154 · w3c/wcag

Context: https://www.w3.org/2020/06/09-ag-minutes#item07 Survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/2020-05-cwa/results#x302 Closes #636 Preview | Diff

GitHub
Show threadAdrian Roselli, pH06d ago

@patrick_h_lauke
This is me swooning.

@SteveFaulkner