I've been scouring the web for peoples opinion on #EVi and I'm seeing a lot of unfair assumptions and judgement for a project forked 3 days ago.
Don't mind if I vent for a second? Please read.
🧵
I've been scouring the web for peoples opinion on #EVi and I'm seeing a lot of unfair assumptions and judgement for a project forked 3 days ago.
Don't mind if I vent for a second? Please read.
🧵
We are not a startup, we have few contributors and even fewer maintainers. We are a group of volunteers trying to continue VIm without AI slop code. We barely know each other. This fork started 3 days ago, be realistic please.
We're also trying to take on a codebase that has been going for decades that only has fallen to the dark side now.
From lobste.rs to Lemmy to Hacker News, we’ve been getting shit left and right in comments for forking the project. This is not everyone however.
(https://lobste.rs/s/izprt4/evi_hard_fork_vim
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47321085
https://lemmy.org/post/4418940)
This isn't a political move nor an ideological one. Not a fork out of spite. This is a fork out of preventing bad AI code that is also fucking our environment from seeping into programs we love.
We don't hate VIm, nor the lead maintainer, but we do not support their actions.
@mrmasterkeyboard I don't understand why anyone should complain. ANYONE can fork the code for ANY reason, so long as it's in line with whatever licence applies to the code.
I hadn't heard about the vim troubles. I knew there were rumblings of something, but I hadn't yet looked what was up.
Thanks for taking the initiative and for raising my awareness. Looking forward to replacing vim installs.
@mrmasterkeyboard The comments complaining about this and gram being "political statements"
Yeah, sort of like how the EFF, copyleft, etc are politically neutral.
@xinit Thanks for not being some of the people in the comment sections that I've observed.
We forked it because we didn't want something that contributed to the current problems we have now or buggy code.
I don't get why anyone tried to politicise, ideologicise or try and put our fork in a position of wrongness in bad faith.
We're allowed to fork a project if we're not happy with it or want to add to it. If we weren't then projects like LibreOffice, FreeBSD and PostgreSQL wouldn't exist.
@mrmasterkeyboard @xinit the #RightToFork is elemental to #FLOSS and necessary for #OpenSource to exist.
We ain't criticizing corporations that maintain outdated inhouse forks out of principle, and I think that #evi isn't a "fork for the sake of forking" but actually does things different and apparenty "irreconcileable" to the mainline Project.
Nit to mention EVERYTHING IS "#POLITICAL" - including "apoliticalness"!
@mrmasterkeyboard @xinit no, but I can imagine these places to be full of assholes just talking shite.
When I forked vim I acted in the face of objections that this was a mere waste of time and that it would be of no practical use to anyone.
I've learned to ignore such neighsayers when confronting them was out if the question…
Still I'm not one to squander my investment [in time and resources] and I remain confident this will be worth far more than the initial appraisal [in shitpostings recieved]…

@mrmasterkeyboard @xinit if you refuse to acknowledge #ahitposters and their hate as legitimate but just respond calmly (if at all) you'll make their blood boil, heads implode and frustrate them the most.
I genuinely want evi to succeed, because this is an important stance to take:
In fact, I want simple and auditable systems - espechally in critical infrastructure - and it needs to be reproduceable and maintainable.