@WeirdWriter Oh I believe you, and me neither. But a lot of people in some places do and just... don't see how absurd and awful it is.
small consolation was when I was the only person at one place who didn't, and rapidly became the most treasured admin person for like 13 departments, because I answered questions and explained things honestly.
i mean, sure, I may send absurdly long emails even today, but at least they SAY a lot instead of just piling up meat in the rough shape of a person
@WeirdWriter Several years back, I drank from the cursed chalice of working with other writers. Every email I've sent since has included swearing, jokes, naked candour, specific well wishes, legally actionable threats against various ministers, etc
It's made me basically unemployable. I'm not going back
There's a good essay by George Orwell called "Politics and the English language" making the case against over-elaborate language.
There's a phrase on the Wikipedia page about the essay which sums it up as "Writers find it easier to gum together long strings of words than to pick words specifically for their meaning."
This is eerily prescient of LLMs in predicting people's motivations and willingness to abandon thought.
The wikipedia page for the essay is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_and_the_English_Language
Subject: Clarification Regarding a Minor Observation on Email Communication Practices
Dear Robert,
I hope this message finds you well and that your week is progressing smoothly.
I wanted to briefly follow up regarding a small observation I encountered earlier today while reviewing a recent email exchange. After carefully reading through a thoughtfully composed message spanning several well-structured paragraphs, I was ultimately able to determine that the pri.. ran out of space
Does it get worse? Yes. I see my current org writing their emails in Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. Bad formatting and all. I wish I was joking.
They don't understand why I'm leaving this month for a new employer that requires everyone to have at least accredited engineering degrees and demonstrable experience.
Professionalism = elitism. Lots of words makes things sound more complicated which equates to smartness and fanciness and gravitas. Displaying the hoops they're enthusiastic to jump through, to impress and conform. Ritualized garbage.
"Workers who love ‘synergizing paradigms’ might be bad at their jobs"

Employees who are impressed by vague corporate-speak like “synergistic leadership,” or “growth-hacking paradigms” may struggle with practical decision-making, a new Cornell study into “corporate BS” reveals.
@John @WeirdWriter
> Corporate Bullshit Receptivity Scale
Had to do a double take to verify this wasn't onion.
If I may join the grump —
even older than any of us, “professional “ meant that the job was too subtle for non-practitioners to judge but too important to not be overseen. So professionals had to mutually uphold the standards and morals of each calling. They swore (professed) their duty.
This was a really powerful and admirable thing!
though it has also been suborned over and over. I can think of more books on how professionalism got turned into a power grab than the reverse.
The original problem, too necessary too subtle, still holds.
@WeirdWriter some people you just wanna yell "JUST SEND ME YOUR FUCKING PROMPT" except then you might hear from them ever again
i used to write this shit by writing what i actually thought, then translating back to business
@WeirdWriter A while back I got an answer from a senior leader -type at work, and after careful analysis it all boiled down to:
— a new policy is on the way
— she (the person telling us) is excited about the new policy
— they took away the jobs of some people at the email-sender’s department
No information at all on when the policy might be ready, what it might contain, or what the job losses have to do with anything.
@WeirdWriter Five word email is good. A ten word email must therefore be twice as good
Repeat until tired