I have never come upon a paywall while casually browsing the news and thought, "Let me get my credit card out."
It's always, "I don't need to know that badly."
I have never come upon a paywall while casually browsing the news and thought, "Let me get my credit card out."
It's always, "I don't need to know that badly."
@AncTreat5358
@Loucovey @pheonix I agree, paying a subscription is reasonable.
Paywalls, constant popups, and ads all over every page are not reasonable.
@AncTreat5358 @Loucovey @pheonix @minego This.
There's too many news sites out there for subscribing to all or even most of them to be a viable option.
Let me pay per article. If you want me to consider a full subscription give me a way to see how much I've spent on articles from you to date - a subscription becomes a lot more compelling if I already know your reporting is solid.
@AncTreat5358 A related idea would be the ability to pay a bit after reading the article to create a gift link.
Since people will want to share good reporting, the outlet benefits both monetarily and in reputation from good articles / coverage
I suspect the harder nut to crack will be administering the micropayments themselves. Presumably you'd need some intermediary where people pay into a "wallet" and can then nominate sites to pay (with the actual payments being batched to manage transaction costs).
@Loucovey True, but there's two challenges here:
* Figuring out which outlets are doing good quality work that I should consider subscribing to (vs those who aren't doing proper fact checking and/or are just cribbing from others original reporting).
* Sometimes theres a single article that's of interest but the outlet in general isn't relevant to me (mostly covers a different geographical area, or focuses mostlt on topics that I don't have an interest in).
In both cases, some way of paying a small fee for a single article would be quite useful.
@StryderNotavi These are great ideas. I like the suggestion paying a certain amount for gift links that will also benefit the newsfeed.
And the micropayments does sound tricky. If not done properly, they could easily lose money from the transaction fees imposed.
@pheonix ...and, like, maybe I might decide to subscribe, if I think they're a good news source -- but then there are ten other sources that also charge. Am I going to subscribe to every single one of them just so I can read an article now and then?
I have to wonder why they haven't gotten together to offer group subscriptions for people who aren't daily readers.
I was actually just wondering about this earlier today. I might actually be willing to pay for a multipass now that I have a regular paycheck. I definitely won't pay for them individually, though.
This also got me thinking... Are poor people just expected to not know what's happening in the world? Isn't that part of how we ended up with Trump?

@pheonix The few times I thought I needed to know, I found another way. Archive.ph/whatever, other news sites, something. There's always another way without giving out private info or credit cards.
The sooner they realize this, the better it will be for everyone...
@pheonix
The same here.
But: In Germany we have a newspaper-website which take a different approach.
Everything is free to read, but you get the chance to pay for an article after reading without the need to subscribe.
I´ve paid 1 or 2 Euros several times to this news-outlet.

Niemand muss taz lesen. Aber wer will, kann. Unser Journalismus ist nicht nur 100 % konzernfrei, sondern auch kostenfrei zugänglich. Texte, die es nicht allen recht machen und Stimmen, die man woanders nicht hört – immer aus Überzeugung und hier auf taz.de ohne Paywall. Das ist dank Ihrer Unterstützung möglich!
I pay regularly (via SEPA transfer) a small amount to a good news paper which allows everyone to read freely without paywall or a lot of ads.
My parent has a digital subscription of another newspaper which has ads and a lot of articles paywalled. If you are logged in, you still see ads, recently the ads did overlay the articles partially hiding them.
I prefer the first model... (even if the second one allows to have family members logged)
@pheonix for me it's " that's a site to remove from my feed".
If I felt the need to pay for news, I would be more picky about the sources.
I certainly wouldn't pay for about 90% of the sites I see which are either plagiarising articles from other sites or clickbaiting (one of my local newspaper sites does that).
@pheonix to everyone in this thread... I was reading a thing recently where people were comparing not paying for news to not paying for church. Thoughts?
The article also dissed on the idea of micropayments, because so few people actually do that, according to the author.