the argument "but you're also no longer using a fountain pen to write" against hand-written code is silly to me. i think close to 100% of people would rather read a short story written in fountain pen by octavia e. butler or william gibson than something that a rando ai-prompted? they could even take their time, why would it need to be rushed?
@mntmn  "but you're also no longer using a fountain pen to write" In fact, I am. 
@Illuminatus @mntmn Same. Heck, I use quill pens sometimes for my calligraphy.
@Owlor @mntmn I got a book on typographies for lettering and I can write insular Celtic types from memory. None of the techbros will ever know an atom of the personal satisfaction I feel.

@Illuminatus @mntmn Same - and it's so satisfying to be able to write in all sorts of fun inks!

Sure can be an expensive hobby though 😆️

@jfred @mntmn We are not talking about if I need* another pen right now.

*I don't, but that won't stop me.

@mntmn these arguments are forever tainted because they come from the direction of optimization of 'work', classifies art as 'work', and establishes a worth-ness to it in monetary value rather than value to humanity. it is terrifying because it lays bare how our system of governance and economies goes against the very concept of being a human
@lynn @mntmn So much THIS.
"But you can create so much more STUFF in a much shorter time with AI!!!11!"
... Right, but what kind of "stuff" are we talking about? The next shitty social network? Some kind of "helper" that makes a stupid process easier to deal with, instead of fixing the stupid process? The millionth crappy rip-off of some game? Anything else that nobody needs, except for the person trying to make a quick buck with it?
Even if their brains are only capable of thinking in capitalist mantra the AI dudes could at least stop telling others that their (shitty) version of the future is inevitable and the one and only thing that will exist in "a few years". Even if the bubble doesn't burst spectacularly, there will always be a market for human made stuff, because some of us don't just want more shit, but to cherish the thought and effort someone has put into something.
@mntmn Attaching a used BIC pen to a vibrator would be more similar to using a slop extruder, and yet more creative.

When I started reading Marko Kloos I remember that he wrote his books in longhand with a good pen.

He has switched to text processing now but he still keeps a warm relationship with good pens https://www.markokloos.com/?cat=13

fountain pens. – markokloos.com

markokloos.com
@mntmn :glances down: wait, I wasn't supposed to be writing code with a fountain pen? 😅 I find it efficient for code architecture tasks honestly.
@mntmn The fountain pen equivalent in coding would be handwritten assembly
@JmbFountain no, that is a category error
@mntmn funnily enough I would reply to that statement: well yeah started to used them recently! (and being left-handed is trickier too :D )
Yeah this is the usual argument they say. But the problem is that if something is an innovation doesn't mean that it has to be good. And these "stochastic parrots" will do more harm than good. Making people lose basic skills, killing creativity, and vomiting a huge amount of mediocre quality products (polluted with wrong content/information)....

@mntmn It's the invasion in to my own space. I've played, and honestly, I'm in a similar space to yourself. I mostly code in C#, and have a NeoVim based workflow. I'll dip in to Visual Studio for legacy Framework projects. My workflow is /efficient/, and allows me to review my own work, and that of my co-workers. It lets me breathe and think. It uses LSP (primarily Roslyn) and a bunch of plugins to flow nicely.

Occassionaly I'm asked how my setup works, and I'll happily talk it through. It's not that complicated, and someone will play with it for a bit, and may find things they like, or not. Again, their choice. On a one on one basis, we can have reasonable discussions, usually with a coffee. There's been learnings on both sides.

For work, we run rules that you're responsible for your own commits, wherever that code comes from. That was true before, and it's true now. So far, it's held up. We had a couple of small incidents, and some re-education was applied.

But by Gods, the minute that I pop my head above the general internet parapet and say I'm /not/ using an AI driven workflow, as a personal preference, you realise how much you're against the grain.

@mntmn the thing is a pen is still a pen.
Yes a ball point pen is easier than a fountain pen (well unless the fountain pen has its own reservoir which some do).
But a pen is still the same kind of tool.
It is like gcc vs tcc vs llvm/clang vs icc vs suncc. They are all compilers but some easier to use and some are stuck in without a reservoir.
Also a writing utensils is similar but in a different language like clang vs flang or c vs Ada.

But llms are not the same as a compiler. Ao it is not even comparable.

@mntmn I take all my technical notes, to-do lists, etc. in fountain pen while I write code, it's a surprisingly good pairing. Writing by hand makes me think differently than writing on a computer. Just because a newer tool exists, doesn't mean the old one is automatically obsolete! That's just bizarre tech-bro brain.

@mntmn ... Yeah, my partner and I definitely _do_ use fountain pens to write. They are so much better than ballpoint if you take care of them.

And you can look at woodworking to see that new, fancy tools don't immediately make old hand tools obsolete.

@mntmn i don't use a fountain pen, but i do often use a pen. often when i want to make sense of something or learn something new, as i find writing helps me to connect thoughts, and the extra time taken to physically note something down often helps me remember it. i may be able to type faster with a keyboard, but that presumes that the goal of writing is to output as many words as possible and not an intrinsic human behaviour
@mntmn Yeah, that's not an actual argument and misses the entire point of putting a sentient brain to a task vs. statistics soup…
@mntmn Fountain pen gang 😀
@mntmn I use a mechanical pencil to draft 6502 assembly code for my Commodore 64, but you can have my fountain pens when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
@mntmn My about 15 fountain pens also disagree with that argument. And, as an active researcher, I don't use AI for anything.
@mntmn I've just discovered the word "fountain pen". So funny!
In french we name this " feather pen " :)
@yannsionneau @mntmn  In Polish we call it "eternal feather" 

@mntmn

but you're also no longer using a fountain pen to write

looks at stack of fountain-pen-written notes

@mntmn One of the more obvious reasons to accelerate the AI data center build-out timeline, is to counter the increasingly destabilizing economies around the world, due to fossil fuels effects - of which, fossil fuels is the main driver of said data centers.

And since US politicians write policy for these industries that supply this current abuse, the coalition of #TechBros with a complicit grifter President, is timely in its execution of said abuse-of-power.

Coalesce people to #BoycottAI

@mntmn no one should ever say that about fountain pens, or they risk being correct
@mntmn You're no longer ploughing the ground by hand. This is true, but does it relate with anything else than a farmer's work?
False analogies help to construct falsely rational ideas all the time. An advance in technology doesn't mean a forced change is needed.
By the way, LLM tools aren't an advance in technology either, but just an advance in marketing.

@luc0x61 @mntmn

We shouldn't be ploughing the ground hardly at all, honestly.

@violetmadder @mntmn That's the point, writing something that sounds obvious.

no till and broadfork disquisitions available on demand, yeah! probably a great analogy but requires a lot of background

@violetmadder @luc0x61 @mntmn

@mntmn I am using a fountain pen to write.
@mntmn <Edsger Dijkstra has entered the chat>

@mntmn i mean, i'm dyspraxic enough to stick to reasonably nice rollerballs, but when i need to draw someone a quick diagram and they don't have to read too much of my fuckawful handwriting? fuck the computer.

(it helps that often seeing the diagram drawn is worth far more than seeing the end product when you're chatting maths or thinly disguised maths)

"the text matters, not the ink" is a legit decision about medium, not just tools. "let a stochastic parrot shit it out" isn't the same thing at all.

@mntmn this argument fucking falls apart against those of us who actually do still use a fountain pen to write.

Text editors are for editing text. Word processors are for processing words. Ballpoint pens and pencils are for filling out forms. Only fountain pens are for actually writing.

Would your crush rather get a letter written in fountain pen, or by AI?

@mntmn

@Dianora

I've moved on from writing code on punched cards to a syntax-sensitive editor but some things I still write with a fountain pen.

I haven't yet found a use case for AI™ in my life.

@EricLawton @mntmn I have a tiny collection in comparison but I always use a FP to write notes. ;)

@mntmn

If you use a typewriter to write, you are still responsible for 100% of what is written.

These pro-AI zealots can't come up with a single logical argument.

@mntmn It is a nonsense phrase, empty of thought and meaning. Literacy is a technology that is unlike tools. It is an augmentation of the human mind, and there are no other technologies like it.
@mntmn I am actually using two fountain pens.
@mntmn The medium of information entry doesn't change the content of the information. You can type the same text more quickly than writing with a fountain pen, but you're still writing it. The "but you're no longer using a fountain pen to write" comparison is apples to oranges, since with an LLM, sure it comes up with information faster than typing it, but you are not creating the information.
@mntmn I am still using a fountain pen to write, btw.
@mntmn It's also just a plain faulty assumption.