
@Illuminatus @mntmn Same - and it's so satisfying to be able to write in all sorts of fun inks!
Sure can be an expensive hobby though 😆️
When I started reading Marko Kloos I remember that he wrote his books in longhand with a good pen.
He has switched to text processing now but he still keeps a warm relationship with good pens https://www.markokloos.com/?cat=13
@mntmn It's the invasion in to my own space. I've played, and honestly, I'm in a similar space to yourself. I mostly code in C#, and have a NeoVim based workflow. I'll dip in to Visual Studio for legacy Framework projects. My workflow is /efficient/, and allows me to review my own work, and that of my co-workers. It lets me breathe and think. It uses LSP (primarily Roslyn) and a bunch of plugins to flow nicely.
Occassionaly I'm asked how my setup works, and I'll happily talk it through. It's not that complicated, and someone will play with it for a bit, and may find things they like, or not. Again, their choice. On a one on one basis, we can have reasonable discussions, usually with a coffee. There's been learnings on both sides.
For work, we run rules that you're responsible for your own commits, wherever that code comes from. That was true before, and it's true now. So far, it's held up. We had a couple of small incidents, and some re-education was applied.
But by Gods, the minute that I pop my head above the general internet parapet and say I'm /not/ using an AI driven workflow, as a personal preference, you realise how much you're against the grain.
@mntmn the thing is a pen is still a pen.
Yes a ball point pen is easier than a fountain pen (well unless the fountain pen has its own reservoir which some do).
But a pen is still the same kind of tool.
It is like gcc vs tcc vs llvm/clang vs icc vs suncc. They are all compilers but some easier to use and some are stuck in without a reservoir.
Also a writing utensils is similar but in a different language like clang vs flang or c vs Ada.
But llms are not the same as a compiler. Ao it is not even comparable.
@mntmn if I remember correctly, neal stephenson is hand-writing his 800 pages tomes.
@mntmn ... Yeah, my partner and I definitely _do_ use fountain pens to write. They are so much better than ballpoint if you take care of them.
And you can look at woodworking to see that new, fancy tools don't immediately make old hand tools obsolete.
but you're also no longer using a fountain pen to write
looks at stack of fountain-pen-written notes
@mntmn One of the more obvious reasons to accelerate the AI data center build-out timeline, is to counter the increasingly destabilizing economies around the world, due to fossil fuels effects - of which, fossil fuels is the main driver of said data centers.
And since US politicians write policy for these industries that supply this current abuse, the coalition of #TechBros with a complicit grifter President, is timely in its execution of said abuse-of-power.
Coalesce people to #BoycottAI
no till and broadfork disquisitions available on demand, yeah! probably a great analogy but requires a lot of background
@mntmn i mean, i'm dyspraxic enough to stick to reasonably nice rollerballs, but when i need to draw someone a quick diagram and they don't have to read too much of my fuckawful handwriting? fuck the computer.
(it helps that often seeing the diagram drawn is worth far more than seeing the end product when you're chatting maths or thinly disguised maths)
"the text matters, not the ink" is a legit decision about medium, not just tools. "let a stochastic parrot shit it out" isn't the same thing at all.
@mntmn this argument fucking falls apart against those of us who actually do still use a fountain pen to write.
Text editors are for editing text. Word processors are for processing words. Ballpoint pens and pencils are for filling out forms. Only fountain pens are for actually writing.
Would your crush rather get a letter written in fountain pen, or by AI?
If you use a typewriter to write, you are still responsible for 100% of what is written.
These pro-AI zealots can't come up with a single logical argument.