@jwildeboer
Let me assure you, There's is 100% chance they are going to be people suing each other online for hurt feelings, once anonymity is gone. Arrests will be made base on hints of what is seriously or jokingly mentioned.
I left Facebook 15 years ago when they asked for my ID, at that time I was using a moniker handle. I was shocked that a social network demanded my ID (someone wanted to attempt to sue me) because was saying a lot of unsavory political things to Bush-voters. I just never gave Facebook my ID, and they closed my account.
This experience repeated on twitter a few years later. Now I see Discord and Google are doing it.
Probably not, when geolocation is simple.
@jwildeboer The CEOs of the corporations pushing for age verification all over the planet have likely raped children.
They're also the ones who always push their own agenda as something that must be done 'for the children.' They've been doing that in the United States since Reagan.
"if I have been using your service for over 19 years, do not ask me for age verification or I will find a competitor"
@jwildeboer Facebook trying to shift the data risk and regulatory burden onto rivals.
Lawmakers need to ask the question: what would somebody like Trump do with this regulation?
Wherever you live in the world, there’s a wannabe Trump eager to place his boot on your neck.
@jwildeboer remember: "never give your personal details to strangers on the internet" includes big tech corporations.
*especially* big tech corporations.
@jwildeboer "The billionaire who runs Palantir wants to know which specific devices around the world are being used by our children"
"The billionaire who runs Palantir is in the Epstein files"
Mayhaps there is a reason other than security that he wants to know where all our children are 😬
Exactly .. With those kind of identifiers it is very well possible to keep the real data secure in a few vaults.
In NL banks have iDin. In a way similar. There are more solutions possible to use.
@jwildeboer
Long story short :
Implementation on libre system is not possible (100 workaround to bypass any implementation).
Such law are a quarter of century too late if you compare the uncensured/unsafe internet of early 2000.
Real question is what does it hides ?
Certralised internet for alphabet and meta ?
Market share in favor of non-libre systems for apple and microsoft ?