@amerpie A tweet from Andre Henry ([@]andrehenry), marked with "sos" in red, displays the text: "Once again, it's that time of year that we pretend Dr. King never said things like this:" Below, a quote image features a black - and - white photo of a person on the left, and on the right, text reads: "Capitalism does not permit an even flow of economic resources. With this system, a small privileged few are rich beyond conscience, and almost all others are doomed to be poor at some level. That's the way the system works. And since we know that the system will not change the rules, we are going to have to change the system. — Martin Luther King — AZ QUOTES"
Provided by @altbot, generated privately and locally using Qwen3-Vl:30b
🌱 Energy used: 0.074 Wh
In my observation for what it's worth, he was not a "radical", just a decent, caring, thoughtful human being.
Generations of corporate media has tried desperately to surpress, erase, distort and vilify the man, just for being that kind of person.
That IS being a radical. That's why they shot him.
Just being a decent human being is why they murdered Renee Good.
@ChrisUplus @Ultraverified @amerpie
Exactly!
And while we're at it: "radix" from the Latin, root. The term "radical" refers to the fundamental origin of a thing, and came into heavier political use in the 18th century with people talking about suffrage and the abolition of slavery, calling for "radical reform" as in meaningful and dramatic change at the roots of an issue. In the wake of the upheaval of the 60s and 70s it was shortened to "rad" as a slang expression for something exciting and positive.
The concept itself is neutral, but conservatives are the ones who will tend to automatically view its connotations as bad and scary because they don't like change and don't want anybody rocking the boat. To them it is basically interchangeable with "extremist".
Dr. King was definitely out to rock the boat. A radical in the best way-- who was reviled, feared, hated, persecuted, murdered... and then the system did its best to sanitize and co-opt his legacy. We named some streets after him, yay civil rights, he won look racism is over everything is fixed okay everybody now go sit back down and shut up.
Nothing short of radical change can save us now, with the whole planet sprinting towards catastrophe for profit.
So when are we "going to have to change the system"?
I've been working on my alternative democracy since 1997.
I've been on Medium since 2019.
I've been on Mastodon since 2023.
I see no sign of anyone wanting to change the system.
@amerpie it hurts so much that speaking plainly and abundantly evident truths like this is considered radical
but I do acknowledge that it is
100% though
@DirtyAnCom @amerpie As is the case for many of these types of killings, it is fully possible for authorities to be responsible at the same time as they are not actively contracting a murder.
I know far too little about this specific case, but a very plausible hypothesis in general is that authorities lets someone be killed through inaction, stokes antipathy towards the person, or even provides resources to violent people.
There’s a whole spectrum of this, and all could be called ”killed him”.
@ahltorp @amerpie What we do have confirmation of is that the FBI sent him a threatening letter demanding that he kill himself or else they would release evidence of his affair (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI%E2%80%93King_letter).
The Trump Regime released thousands of files related to his assassination (as part of the "flood the zone" strategy to distract from everything else), but as far as I know, there's nothing that explicitly admits they were responsible for his assassination, beyond that they saw him as a dangerous adversary. (https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-administration-releases-fbi-records-on-mlk-jr-despite-his-familys-opposition)
I just firmly believe they were responsible, whether directly or by proxy, like you say.
@capngloval @amerpie describing capitalism as "not perfect" is kind of burying the lede. It is an awful system, designed by wicked people to accumulate power while simultaneously getting the have-nots to blame themselves for their failure to be one of the haves and crabs-in-a-barreling each other.
Capitalism is perfect, in the same way that a xenomorph is perfect. Unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of morality.
So weird reading all those comments. I tought most Mastodon users would be anti-capitalist^^
"Capitalism makes tons of people live in poverty" isn't a radical view, just facts.
Americans especially did a really good job at convincing people that the only alternative to capitalism is (a fake representation of) communism.
When in reality there are a ton of other systems (also you can't directly jump from capitalism to communism, there are steps/systems in between)
@amerpie I don't think was as controversial back when it was said.
I don't think there is anything making you inherently evil if you criticize capitalism, so even today, you might come across as naive, but you're not really Stalin, though.
@squirrel @amerpie the inalienable right to appropriate the positive and negative fruits of your labor.
Source: https://www.ellerman.org/inalienable-rights-part-i-the-basic-argument/
@jlou @amerpie I understand why somebody would want this. Myself, I kinda feel quite happy renting myself out and not having any responsibility for the fruits, good or bad, of my labor.
I mean, it is a capable way or organizing, but I'm unsure if it is everything to everyone, if you know what I mean.
And it did not change since then… high time we did that now…
@humourmetom @amerpie
If you step back further you realize that the communist elites and the capitalist elites are identical apart from their costumes and fairy tales they speak out loud.
The only way out of the lies os to realize both systems must coexist for durable peace. Either "ism" one on its own can only end in tears.
@amerpie Wait until MAGA finds out Jesus Christ was an early socialist, sharing bread & wine, feeding the poor & healing the sick without demanding monetary payment or recurring donations for legal defense funds not even existing!
Donnie may be able to walk on Trump wine — after he dropped a bottle onto the floor.
But he'll never be able to walk on water.
And he's not above the law & won't ever be!
@SpaciousCoder78
Just found this online: https://www.reddit.com/r/pune/comments/1qgynby/interesting_conversation_with_our_maid_about/
Someone stated that in Pune, the parties gave out anywhere in between 4K-12K, maybe more per person to vote. I myself saw 4-5 days prior to the elections, people not from Pune being bought in and paid. Pathethic condition. Tax payers money and the #governmentofindia #goi is blind. Actually, they are not blind, they are in-part.