Global Coal Demand Hits All-Time High
https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Global-Coal-Demand-Hits-All-Time-High.html

Sorry, didn't we "transition" from coal to oil back in the 1960s?

Yeah, but now coal is finished because even though coal is at an all time high, representing over 25% of global energy demand, these incredible, amazing "renewables" are going to wipe coal off the face of the earth with their super-fantastic "Green" Transition.

Yes, yes, wind and solar only meet about 6% of global energy demand right now.

No energy transition

Global Coal Demand Hits All-Time High

Global coal demand is on track to hit an all-time high of 8.85 billion tons this year due to shifts in policy, weather, and fuel prices, defying previous forecasts from the International Energy Agency.

OilPrice.com

"Histories of energy and resources cannot be understood without reference to one another – they are interdependent, complementary and cumulative. In addition, 95% of the world’s coal was mined after 1900. Also, the use of wood energy significantly increased in the 20th century, and even more so since the 2000s."

https://news.cnrs.fr/articles/the-myth-of-energy-transition

The myth of energy transition

The concept of an “energy transition” is misleading, states the CNRS science historian Jean-Baptiste Fressoz. He explains why coal and oil never replaced wood, and that the fight against climate change must be based on available, affordable technologies.

CNRS News
@gerrymcgovern So much "wishful" confusion between the serious progress being made on addressing the "easy" problem of electricity generation while hardly dipping the toe in the water of the industrial / marine / aviation / military elephant in the room.
@wavesculptor Yeah, we focus on the energy production problem because we can make money out of that. But we don't focus on the real problem: the energy and materials consumption problem. It's a Growth Death Cult and many environmentalists have convinced themselves that technology will save them. Growth is the real problem and technology only accelerates growth. Technology never reduces growth.

@gerrymcgovern

"But it will be China and its power demand and energy transition pace that will determine the trajectory of global coal demand in the near to medium term, the agency noted."

Do NOT expect coal demand to be reduced by 2030 unless the Chinese have a reason not to use it. (I know you know, but for those who don't.)

If I see one more person talk about China's successful renewables push, I will scream. All of the tech in the world means nothing if nothing changes.

@dnkboston Yeah, I read that China is opening 6 times more coal plants than the rest of the world combined. China uses an all the above approach, and wind and solar are as much for energy security as anything else. In a Growth Death Cult, there are no energy transitions. Never were. Never will be. It's just more, more, more, more, more.
@gerrymcgovern So how can that forecasting company even pretend that coal usage will be reduced by 2030?
@dnkboston It may be "reduced" relative to other energy sources because of growth. Total volume may keep increasing but because its not increasing as fast as other energy sources, that's a "win" for the environment. Or coal production will plateau for 30-50 years at record levels, and that will be another breathtaking "win" for the environment. It's all spin, spin, spin ...
The myth of energy transition

The concept of an “energy transition” is misleading, states the CNRS science historian Jean-Baptiste Fressoz. He explains why coal and oil never replaced wood, and that the fight against climate change must be based on available, affordable technologies.

CNRS News
@kim_balfour Cutting in to say I read this book and it was fantastic @gerrymcgovern

@kim_balfour Jean-Baptise Fressoz is brilliant and his book More and More and More is essential reading if you want to get to understand the fake energy transition. He's a serious scientist and has all the facts.

More and More and More, Jean-Baptiste Fressoz, Penguin, 2025
https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/464145/more-and-more-and-more-by-fressoz-jean-baptiste/9781802067316

More and More and More

It has become habitual to think of our relationship with energy as one of transition: with wood superseded by coal, coal by oil, oil by nuclear and then at some future point all replaced by green sources. Jean-Baptiste Fressoz’s devastating but unnervingly entertaining book shows what an extraordinary delusion this is. Far from the industrial era passing through a series of transformations, each new phase has in practice remained almost wholly entangled with the previous one. Indeed the very idea of transition turns out to be untrue. The author shares the same acute anxiety about the need for a green transition as the rest of us, but shows how, disastrously, our industrial history has in fact been based on symbiosis, with each major energy source feeding off the others. Using a fascinating array of examples, Fressoz describes how we have gorged on all forms of energy – with whole forests needed to prop up coal mines, coal remaining central to the creation of innumerable new products and oil still central to our lives. The world now burns more wood and coal than ever before. This book reveals an uncomfortable truth: ‘transition’ was originally itself promoted by energy companies, not as a genuine plan, but as a means to put off any meaningful change. More and More and More forces its readers to understand the modern world in all its voracious reality, and the true nature of the challenges heading our way.

@nan_ano @gerrymcgovern Interesting article. Take home message:

“Based on current world production levels of solar PV, an attempt to
replace conventional electricity production with solar
PV would require a dramatic increase in the amount of
coal and petcoke needed for silicon smelting , along with
the increased cutting of vast areas of forest for charcoal
and wood chips.”

Is there a full cradle to grave analysis that includes all CO2 production that shows Solar panels winning?

#degrowth

@nan_ano @gerrymcgovern I would also assume that the upcoming perovskite solar panels will substantially reduce the carbon footprint of cell manufacturing.

@btschumy
Solar panels do indeed "win" from a CO2 perspective but it is their totality of harms that we must measure. They are cynically sold as green and clean and renewable and cost-free. That they are part of some mythical "Green" Transition. But they're just adding to the energy mix: a new set of harms added on top of an old set of harms. Thus, it total, we get an acceleration of harms.

@nan_ano

@nan_ano @gerrymcgovern

I was reading some of this, "coal is required to make the PVC plastic too." no, it is far worse...as someone who's career was in plastics, those flame proof cured plastics usually have a LOT of lead and antimony compounded in the polymers so they don't melt and burn down the house. Same with house wiring and especially true with high voltage power cable. Your house wiring and fire resistant plastics, wear gloves as those microplastics have an even bigger toxic payload. Manufacturing has endless horrific dirty details throughout the supply chain...but the engineering is getting better every decade...