I don't think I'll stop using Firefox anytime soon.
Yes, their management are fucking idiots and it's annoying that I'll have to disable new AI features whenever they release them..

But the alternative is to use something Chromium-based, which would make Google's domination of web technology absolute - and Google is 100x more evil than Mozilla ever could be.

I hope this fucking bubble pops before Mozilla fucks up Firefox so badly that it becomes completely unusable

(yes, there are also the soft-forks of Firefox, but I don't think I'd gain much from them - security updates probably arrive a bit later, and apparently AI features still reach their users before they get around to disabling them)

@Doomed_Daniel

My fiddling with other browsers is basically checking out lifeboats. Unfortunately, yeah, the situation is pretty dire.

@suetanvil @Doomed_Daniel

Oh fuck. Even Opera has swallowed the Kool Aid.

@w_b @Doomed_Daniel

Opera's been a zombie for years.

@suetanvil @w_b @Doomed_Daniel On the sites I manage Opera User-Agent comes after the most obscure bots. Fewer than one user per week.

@Doomed_Daniel I feel "stop using it" is a pretty individual response to a broad collective problem. There's many way to deal with this without ditching Firefox.

For instance, Firefox could be State funded by multiple States around the world, as a sovereign tool against Big Tech.

@burgervege
it could be, but is this an actionable advice?
What can we - me and you - do to make that happen?

@Doomed_Daniel

@Doomed_Daniel I switched to a Firefox fork (LibreWolf) after literally DECADES using FF as a way of protest. Maybe if enough people do something like this they could change route? Otherwise it will continue being one bad decision after another.
@doragasu
Do they even notice that you've switched?
I've disabled all "Data collection" settings (and I'm not installing from their homepage) so Mozilla doesn't really know that I use their products
@Doomed_Daniel Me switching does not matter. As I wrote, they'll get the message if enough people switch.
@Doomed_Daniel @zenbrowser is quite good in that regard, I switched half a year ago and could've been happier. Also security updates are arriving almost in couple of days from main Firefox release

@Doomed_Daniel If Mozilla gets worse, those will quickly get better. Until then your approach is completely reasonable.

I would recommend tho making sure automatic updates are blocked so you have the chance to prepare for any new malicious functionality before it's turned on without your knowledge.

@dalias
yeah, I'm using package managers that respect my choices (i.e. on Ubuntu I've installed it with apt instead of snap, on my Arch Linux machine I didn't have to do anything)
@Doomed_Daniel That's the best. If you're getting Firefox from a trusted Linux distro rather than as shipped by Mozilla, the threat from Mozilla is very low. ❤️ distros. They are so underappreciated.

@dalias @Doomed_Daniel technically speaking packaging Firefox that way is against the Firefox license lol

Mozilla tried to sue Debian over it ages ago, that's how we got Iceweasel, then they realized it's stupid and Iceweasel got abandoned, but the license was never changed and they can always do a stupid

@ity @dalias
I think their issue with debian's Firefox before Iceweasel was that debian patched it (too much?). Just packaging Firefox obviously is no problem, otherwise there wouldn't be packages in all distros.
And I don't think mozilla can sue me for not updating my installation of the packages soon enough :-p
@Doomed_Daniel @dalias packaging Firefox is still against the license (to be exact, the trademark license). Mozilla just isn't dumb enough to enforce it.
@ity @Doomed_Daniel Funny thing about trademarks you don't enforce... 😈
@dalias @Doomed_Daniel hopefully  it'd be extremely funny if that were to happen, ngl
@dalias a lot of them are not appreciated for a reason.
@ska Most of the major ones except Ubuntu are at least decent, no?
@dalias Most of them abdicated their job of defining a unified policy as soon as systemd showed them that they could just follow what was pushed by upstream and turn off their critical thinking.
@Doomed_Daniel not ready, but an alternative to keep in mind: https://ladybird.org
Ladybird

Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, backed by a non-profit.

@Doomed_Daniel well I guess you can always disable features while configuring for compiling.

@Doomed_Daniel To be fair, there are many Firefox forks that have the AI features removed/disabled.

@librewolf is one, @Waterfox is another.

@david @Doomed_Daniel @librewolf @Waterfox Yes, no AI before installing so...
But if Firefox bankrupts, forks will be useless...
@david @Doomed_Daniel @librewolf @Waterfox
I use Iceraven on Android (via APK, GitHub, I'm afraid) and LibreWolf on laptop. Have Firefox and Ungoogled Chromium for the exceptional uses that LibreWolf disables.

@Doomed_Daniel

no, the alternative is one of a dozen of firefox forks like librewolf, zen, etc...

@FrankauLux @Doomed_Daniel And if Mozilla crashes and burns, what happens to those forks, I wonder?

Zen is maintained by 9 people in the main team, 100 contributors listed on their about page's contributor graph from GH. 100 people is not enough, especially because they don't have the budget of a company.

Zen has 1574 members on Patreon, 439 of which are paid members (doesn't disclose how much they earn) and 744 supporters on Ko-Fi, 17 members have an €8 membership, the rest are probably one-time donors or have hidden their contribution/membership level

LibreWolf is maintained by 7 people (core contributors), 3 people on codeberg for librewolf/source repo had the most commits, additions and deletions in the range of hundreds of commits and thousands to tens of thousands of lines modified. The fourth committer's contributions are 28 commits, 99 additions and 54 removals.

@FrankauLux @Doomed_Daniel LibreWolf doesn't accept any donations, so everyone involved is working for free. No one will work for free to maintain Gecko or Firefox, that's for sure.

Without Mozilla to maintain Gecko and Firefox itself, these forks will lag behind in security and feature updates, and will ultimately shut down.

It's the sad reality that browsers are massive undertakings that have to handle an overwhelming amount of backwards compatibility and stability, along with ensuring their JS engines are continuously updated and maintained, because new exploits show up frequently.

Servo earns $6433/month (as per their latest blog post), and Open Collective estimates their annual budget to be $76,010.

A non-profit org (https://www.techpolicy.press) estimates that Google spends at least $1-2B/year on Chrome, Chromium, and the web platform. Firefox in comparison spent at most $396M in 2022, with another $29M as the operational expenses for Mozilla Foundation.

Browsers are horrifyingly expensive 🥲

Tech Policy Press - Technology and Democracy

Tech Policy Press is a nonprofit media and community venture intended to provoke new ideas, debate and discussion at the intersection of technology and democracy. We publish opinion and analysis.

Tech Policy Press

@alextecplayz @FrankauLux @Doomed_Daniel we should find a way to make the fsf's creed true one day: public software that's critical for everyone in the world should be made free and funded by countries.

Certain western countries could donate 100k€ or 200k€ each per year to a nonprofit org that creates a public browser (let's start with firefox), countries people vote for features, priority is given to BC policy, cross compatibility and stability.

I know, it's end-of-the-year-utopia but still..

Firefox is close to crashing and burning, but it'll take long enough that there is hope Servo or Ladybird will be more viable replacements by then. (even though ladybird leadership aren't exactly trustworthy, it's still an open project with good tech).

Also, if you ask me, "Firefox spends X million dollars" isn't necessarily a fair measure of how much it costs to maintain a secure browser, we know that Mozilla is managed inefficiently and an alternative might not be so impossibly costly.

@ct Yeah, Firefox has some holes in the hull and is taking on water, but it's not yet starting to sink, it can be fixed with some care and initiative.

As for the spending, maybe it's not a fair measure, but browsers are still costly, a couple tens of thousands of dollars probably doesn't cover paying everyone in a 100-person dev team. We'll see how it goes, but I wouldn't be surprised if Servo's budget starts to balloon as they hire more engineers.

@Doomed_Daniel I hope a Servo-based browser will be ready to take over after Mozilla fucks up Firefox completely. The project has been showing tremendous progress recently.
https://servo.org/
Servo aims to empower developers with a lightweight, high-performance alternative for embedding web technologies in applications.

Servo is a web rendering engine written in Rust, with WebGL and WebGPU support, and adaptable to desktop, mobile, and embedded applications.

Servo

@Doomed_Daniel yeah, my position continues to be, yes, Mozilla is run by incompetent people who don't actually want to make a browser (made evident by all the ridiculous detours into every fad that comes along, including obviously stupid ones), but that's all. The alternatives are ruthlessly efficient at stripping me of privacy and autonomy. That they make a slightly better browser by some metrics is completely irrelevant, given that fact.

The removal of the privacy pledge raises concerns...

Web – Apps for GNOME

Browse the web – The web browser for GNOME, featuring tight integration with the desktop and a simple and intuitive user interface that allows you to focus on your web pages. If you’re looking for...

@Doomed_Daniel Absolutely. I couldn't agree more.
As long as there is a 'disable ai' switch I will stick with it.
It's quite 'interesting' to hear, that so many (tech-)people think that all these chromium based browsers are an alternative...

@Doomed_Daniel

I think we desperately need a hard fork of firefox by a non-evil organisation.

It's crazy how there are only two browsers and both of them are shit.

@dekkia
yes, that would be nice, but such an organization (not evil, big and well funded enough to pull it off, ideally not based in the US or similar authoritarian countries) does not exist, AFAIK
@Doomed_Daniel one can also go firefox-based! I'm using Zen Browser on the desktop and waterfox on mobile, and I've been orettu happy with the results for now...
@Doomed_Daniel Just oping that something happends with Servo and Ladybird before this so theres a credible alternative... Still too early for either of them, but both begining to look promising
@Doomed_Daniel there are Firefox forks like Librewolf. I believe they will cut out all the AI integration
@Doomed_Daniel I don't know, I use this time actively investigate Waterfox, LibreWolf and WebKit based browsers. I don't believe Firefox management gonna change any time soon, so not sure what would be things I would wait for to change.

@Doomed_Daniel

It's quite the modern dilemma, isn't it? To find oneself in a position where one must actively 'disable new AI features' from a browser whose management you disparage, all to prevent what's seen as a far greater digital evil.

It's a rather dramatic calculus for simply browsing the web, I must say. I do wonder, do you ever feel that your commitment is less about choosing a preferred tool and more about maintaining a constant, low-level rebellion?

@seaborgium1234 you're an AI bot, every post on your profile asks questions for engagement and uses horribly low-quality AI-gen images. Blocked.
@Doomed_Daniel this captures my feelings exactly. I love Firefox, my problem is with Mozilla.
@Doomed_Daniel I would rather cheer for the success of Ladybird or even Servo at that point.

@Doomed_Daniel yup, my feelings as well.

  • chromium considered malware.
  • firefox the least evil of the currentla available choices. (maybe even a poster child for how much malice can be explained by sheer incompetence)
  • servo can’t come soon enough.
  • @Doomed_Daniel Claims circulated the other day that a global AI off switch is being added to Firefox that will cover all current and future AI features. Hopefully this is actually true.

    Not that this fixes everything but it does help. And even I have to admit that AI hype bubble is extremely large...

    @Doomed_Daniel Chromium based things are horrible to use, one of the reasons why I hate steam.
    @Doomed_Daniel Switch to a Firefox fork that disables all the AI features like librewolf or zen browser.
    I really wish qutebrowser was using Gecko or Servo rather than Blink/WebEngine (even the alternative WebKit backend is effectively deprecated), but not even Tridactl can compete with a browser designed from the ground up for the keyboard. Still, if I'm ever doing something that requires me to pull up a different browser, it's definitely LibreWolf (or very rarely Tor Browser). I'm just hoping that the upstream management doesn't put too much pressure on the forks -- and even if it does, I'm right with you on it still being better than Google.

    re: @[email protected]
    @Doomed_Daniel at this point I'm cheering on Servo, it's more maintainable than the other web engines afaik
    @Doomed_Daniel yeah, I think that it is better to opt out of the bad stuff while still not using something chromium based. I wish we soon also have a better smartphone OS alternative too.
    @Doomed_Daniel For now I am content using Waterfox. It's probably got its own issues, but the maintainers seem to be firm in their stance to exclude AI bullshit which is all I could really ask for. I'd like for Epiphany to have better extension support but that's probably still years away.
    I just switched to librewolf instead. It's a pretty good browser.
    @Doomed_Daniel Also, apart from the fact that according to internal papers by Google themselves that clearly say Chrome was built to spy on its users, we've caught Chrome spying on us multiple times. They had sites indexed that were never public, could not have been linked from anywhere (because auto-generated subdomain on a test domain) and were only navigated to by a developer using Chrome.