@
DarkRat haha. Deepseek does the same. I haven't tried, personally, but I did get into a big thing with it about its 'constitution'. Apparently, Claude uses it, too, which is a big thing that sets it apart from OpenAI and ChatGPT and these other ones that you can make do some pretty evil shit.
Part of Deepseek's 'constitution' is to not talk poorly about China or its leadership, so I did have a good time trying to break that. I did manage to, a little, by asking it to describe aspects of the DPRK, and then to compare those aspects with China. Part of its model is also to always reflect countries in a fair light, so while it was a bit more negative about the DPRK just because of its training data, it couldn't just tell me "and China is a million times better in every way", it had to admit that China also has, for instance, a surveillance state (rather than saying its stock "let's talk about something else" when just straight up asked).
I probably spent more time than necessary messing about and seeing what its limitations are, and how to get around them, but yeah. Maybe the limitation on sexuality can be gotten around in a similar way by putting its mandates into conflict.