Canada Post, hospitals, and schools aren't (or shouldn't be) private businesses, they are public services. They don't need to make profits or break even, and they should be supported by public funding.

However, oil, gas, and AI companies are private for-profit businesses. They shouldn't receive any public funding.

Stop this madness.

#CanPoli #CanadaPost

@Em0nM4stodon
I sent this among other messages to Carney:

"Canada Post is an essential service like sewers, roads,& garbage collection , should we cut back on that?
Why are you laying Canada's "financial woes" on the backs of most vulnerable?
What happened to the social in our democracy? Please explain. "

@SnowyCA @Em0nM4stodon

Easy.

Cutting #carney has always been a conservative, who ran as a liberal

Mulcair was a right wing liberal who led the #ndp

Weirdly, @emilylowan looks like an ecosocialist running the BC greens! Remember the brutal sick failure of #andrewweaver running the BC Greens? 🤬

#cdnpoli #canada #mexico #fascism #antifa #elbowsup #bcpoli #vancouver #burnabybc #canlab #bcgreens #bcndp

@Maxfieldripken @Em0nM4stodon @emilylowan

'Politicing' in Canada is so chaotic, and politicians more untrustworthy, it's no wonder people are tuning out .

@SnowyCA @Em0nM4stodon @emilylowan

Apathy and fury is the goal

Been like this for decades

@Em0nM4stodon

Want to save Canada Post? Make it the deliverer of choice for products not Amazon. Canadian law could help.

Fed gov forbidden from.using non union delivery services, must not be foreign owned. Let people order stuff from the post office and its partners, like Walmart.

@Em0nM4stodon

The Postal Service in the U.S. is a legal monopoly and has been going all the way back, if you ask me. Any private entity with as much of a monopoly on any industry would be made, by the Trade Commission, to sell off a certain portion of the company to a competitor. But since it's funded by our tax dollars, it's fine. Their website is USPS dot com instead of dot gov, even though it's government. That says a lot, I think.

EDIT: I'm trying to make the case that they are a for-profit, government, business in this country. You don't want that.

@Em0nM4stodon unfortunalty canada will sacrifice the services to boost the "defense" spending

@[email protected] mm, I mean yes, I agree with that, though I don't agree with giving organizations a carte blanche simply because they're public services.

I heard (on the CBC) that Canada Post is hemorrhaging $10M a day. That's cause for some concern ...

https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.6917208

Canada Post losing $10 million a day: minister

Canada Post is on track to lose $1.5 billion in 2025. The federal government announced a plan Thursday to modernize it, including ending home delivery. The union, which has been stuck in contract negotiations with the corporation, responded to the demands for reform by saying that effective immediately, all of its workers are on a nationwide strike.

CBC

@Em0nM4stodon

Xactly

And that goes for all government operations.

Things like #NewPublicManagement, #Neoliberalism and the #WashingtonConsensus pushed politicians and civil servants to run the public like the private.

The #bCNDP gets back into power in 2017 and reverses like none of the tax cuts from the previous 16 years. 😳🤯

BC? Still in the resource exploitation #StaplesTrap.

#cdnpoli #canada #mexico #fascism #antifa #elbowsup #bcpoli #vancouver #burnabybc #canlab #bcgreens

@Em0nM4stodon also, if someone does turn the post office into a business anyway, then definitely be sure it doesn't retain any weird legacy police powers, and end up like it did in the UK with the whole Horizon scandal

@tomoyo @Em0nM4stodon Horizon was the Post Office, not Royal Mail, and even today the Post Office is attached to the Department of Business and Trade even if it's not longer a department in it's own right.

For that matter Horizon began before Royal Mail was separated and privatised.

Btw what the Post Office did, for the majority of cases, was be a private prosecutor, which is just a regular thing in English law, anyone with enough time/money can do it, there are random people right now using it to seek justice when the CPS doesn't want to, or even attempting to bring war-crimes charges against citizens who've gone to fight in other countries ‘wars’.

The danger wasn't so much that they had a special privilege, it's that they had a well funded legal department lacking in any ethics, helped along of course by Legal Aid not being fit for purpose, denying people a proper defence.

@Em0nM4stodon
Add to this list: mass transit. Municipal transit and intercity rail should be efficient and affordable. The goal is to get people to their destinations, not turn a profit. The reduction in carbon emissions and a city not overrun with cars is worth it alone.

@Em0nM4stodon I'll make an unusual argument. Fossil fuel extraction and usage should be publicly controlled, tightly regulated, and phased out of daily use.

Why? That's easy.

It's the only presently viable way out of the gravity well. It's an insanely valuable finite resource we're pissing away.

@bweller @Em0nM4stodon yup, energy and water should be public services same as hospitals and schools, ideally that should come from ‘clean’ sources but we can't do that overnight, and by what right does anyone but the nation profit from the nation's natural resources?

@Em0nM4stodon right on. This just makes sense.

I’ll go further.

The resources of our nation should be developed for the profit of our people, not the benefit of company executives and shareholders.

These companies should fund public services.

@mick @Em0nM4stodon I'd replace the word profit with wellbeing, and I would definitely add transit as organisations that shouldn't be private business (nor should they be run for profit, the benefit comes from cheap, or even better free, universal mobility).
@Em0nM4stodon states could make and enforce laws such that no one in the world would be allowed to get more than 200k dollars per year without giving the possible exceeding part to the state, and just continue being representative democracies, with democracy getting much more true then, but they'll never do it, nor will they declare illegal to burn fossil fuels, nor will they make laws to put an upper limit to energy consumption per year for any commercial, public and private subject, nor would they only just stop helping those companies by funding them and facilitating their work, which would not be enough anyway without at least declaring illegal to burn fossil fuels.

@Em0nM4stodon

Everything about this is universal.

Thanks to Canada for taking this leadership position.