Data privacy rules like GDPR are fueling a climate of risk aversion, slowing open data progress.
See how to break barriers in the Pathways to Open Data report: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/research/pathways-to-open-data
#OpenData #DataPrivacy #LinuxFoundationResearch
@linuxfoundation this is incredibly blatant propaganda and every time you post shit like this it reminds me how divorced the linux foundation is from linux users. the GDPR is the bare fucking minimum protocol necessary to support for citizens to be able to trust corporations for things that otherwise would have to be restricted to much more highly regulated entities like the government itself
@linuxfoundation the GDPR is a protocol negotiated with corporations by representatives of the citizens in order to give corporations the opportunity to demonstrate they can do better than resting on their laurels and extracting a monthly tithe from anyone foolish enough to do business with them
@linuxfoundation the GDPR is an example of the same opportunity and interoperability and autonomy that the linux operating system represents to its users, from red hat to linus torvalds to whomever the next linus torvalds will be who identifies a severe lack with the corporate status quo and builds something they cannot destroy. the linux kernel uses the GPL software license because in fact there are some things "open" can't buy and that is freedom
@hipsterelectron @linuxfoundation The GDPR is the compromise position. The alternative is "you don't do business with data gathered from users, ever, in any way".

@ska @hipsterelectron
The thing is, whenever @linuxfoundation takes up a position like this, people need a gentile reminder of whose interests the foundation represents:

https://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/members

#GDPR #LinuxFoundation

Members of the Linux Foundation

Linux Foundation members help support the development of shared technology resources while accelerating their own innovation through open source.

@ck @hipsterelectron @linuxfoundation Oh, absolutely. And it is good to call them out whenever needed (which, unfortunately, is more and more often).

@ck
Haha, how pathetic.
And thanks for the information

@ska @hipsterelectron @linuxfoundation

@ck @ska @hipsterelectron @linuxfoundation There are so many globo-corps on that list that it literally crashed the browser on my tablet.

@ck
People need a gentle reminder to tell the Linux Foundation to get stuffed.

@ska @hipsterelectron @linuxfoundation

@ck @ska @hipsterelectron @linuxfoundation

wow, that's a lot of big corporations who are profiting from the work of a bunch of dedicated mostly volunteers (I'm sure some do fund foss+linux work, but I'm also sure its nowhere near the amount that they gain by shipping linux stack devices, appliances and equipment.

cough cough `curl` cough cough to name one wildly overutilized and completely underfunded example.

@tezoatlipoca @ck @hipsterelectron @linuxfoundation That has been the main problem of FOSS for decades: the funding we get is peanuts compared to the benefits these corporations make by using FOSS. It is capitalism pillaging the commons, as it does, and it would be good to restore some balance.
@ska @linuxfoundation @hipsterelectron Which is my position.

Fuck corposcum and rentiers.

@hipsterelectron @linuxfoundation reading the report, it's really embarrassing.

[the] company wanted to map how the workers in the production process move, in order to avoid risk for them. But then it came out that there was
a GDPR problem because they were collecting personal data.”

This is ridiculous. First of all, I highly doubt it was impossible to anonymize those employees and collect data under some opaque identifier. And if it was something employees wanted, as the report suggests, collecting consent forms is certainly doable.

most people who don’t know what you can do with it, they just go to this very safe side and say, you can’t do anything anymore.

I've seen it multiple times, and each one of them was a propaganda against the GDPR. It's not that complicated, and never was. But if enough people pretend it is, maybe it can force the EU to reconsider, right?

@shine @hipsterelectron @linuxfoundation
Exactly.

Complying with the GDPR is easy. Just don't collect any data you don't need.

And don't ask marketing about "need", you hired those guys to build intricate lies to create a "need" where one doesn't exist. Of course that's what they are going to do if you ask them.

@shine @hipsterelectron @linuxfoundation
"You can't do anything anymore" sounds so much like "you can't even say hi let alone complement women anymore!"
How cwuel of you to not let me be a pwedatow anymo!
@shine @hipsterelectron @linuxfoundation companies love going "wah wah wah, we can't/won't do anything anymore if we have to follow rules, there shouldn't be any rules for us"
@hipsterelectron @linuxfoundation @me_ The Linux Foundation is a 501(c)(6) organization; it explicitly exists for the benefit of its members. This is in contrast to 501(c)(3) organizations, which are explicitly for the public benefit. The FreeBSD, NetBSD, and (ahem 👋🏼) Plan 9 Foundations are 501(c)(3) organizations. I am less well-versed in Canadian tax codes, but my understanding is the OpenBSD foundation is their equivalent of a (c)(3). LF is a notable outlier here.
@hipsterelectron @linuxfoundation hey they edited to an even more blatant post
@SRAZKVT @linuxfoundation was looking through kernel config options all weekend and still not done and you can kind of see over time how stuff around linux ends up like this but i still think most maintainers would not at all agree with this framing

@linuxfoundation So, what you’re saying is that we should not have laws that protect normal people from having their data farmed in ways that would make even the stasi blush?

It’s funny in a very sad way that something called the Linux foundation is having this extremely corporate boot licking message, considering that a good share of Linux desktop users are that to get away from the corporate spying.

@ainmosni

They're shilling AWS, AI, and Google (kubernetes) in their last few posts, so, yeah, it seems they're thoroughly Big Tech boot lickers. Fuck em.

@antinomian @ainmosni look at the highest tier members of @linuxfoundation and you know who's responsible for that bs.

  • FUCKING #GAFAMs NEED TO BE ABOLISHED AND BANNED!

BECAUSE THEY ARE THE WORST CAPITALISM BRED SINCE IG FARBEN!

Kevin Karhan :verified: (@[email protected])

@[email protected] I guess @[email protected] is working hard at cancelling trust into them. - Maybe they need to stop letting it's biggest members write their #PR? Cuz this is just [unacceptable betrayal!](https://infosec.space/@kkarhan/115011002487051208)

Infosec.Space
@ainmosni @linuxfoundation Just look at with whom they side when it comes to projects and license changes. they always fork the projects for big cloud providers and dont work with the companies.
@ainmosni @linuxfoundation It's hilariously ironic. In the report they quote a participant that the GPDR itself does not prevent any project, but people falsely think so and kill projects because of it.
Aral Balkan (@[email protected])

Attached: 1 image @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] Wait, you’re telling me trillion-dollar corporations like Google, Meta, X, etc., aren’t on my side? What next? Billionaires aren’t our friends? ;)

Aral’s fediverse server
@linuxfoundation Please learn the difference between "open data" and "private data". As a bonus, also look up the difference to "public data".

@linuxfoundation

Are you guys for real?

As in, is this account secretly run by Microsoft? I just can't believe a Linux organisation would be on the side of fucking over users and leaking all our data. Like what's the point of linux if it offers the GPL to developers but literally nothing to end users?

If I wanted my data stolen, I could use OSX and be able to use Sibelius.

So is there some way you can prove you are who you say you are?

@linuxfoundation shut up or i’ll break barriers in pathways to haiku on the desktop

@linuxfoundation

Pretty unfortunate catchline, I think.

The GDPR is for personal data. If your company is held back from opening up their data by the GDPR, either the data you have is data about me personally, in which case it should never be open, or you do not understand the GDPR.

So maybe "Lack of understanding for privacy regulation is fueling a climate oft risk aversion" would have been a more accurate headline.

@linuxfoundation Oh what the actual fuck, Linux Foundation.

I can't even come up with anything else.

What the fuck?

@linuxfoundation GDPR is based on several human rights treaties ( article 8 of the ECHR, article 12 of the UCHR, article 17 of the ICCPR ), and is based on various laws of the 60s and 70s passed in France, Germany and Sweden. In turn, those were based on treaties from the 50s aiming to avoid a repeat of Nazi Germany and WW II. Describing human rights as "fueling a climate of aversion" is shameful.

Looks like Linux Foundation wants to be second Free Software Foundation.

FOSS related organisation not giving a fuck about users.

Money does not stink.

@linuxfoundation

@hrw @linuxfoundation Obviously, the #LinuxFoundation does what it's biggest tier members say...

  • And being pro-corporate & anti-#privacy is the logical conclusion!

https://infosec.space/@kkarhan/115010986088720245

Kevin Karhan :verified: (@[email protected])

@[email protected] I guess @[email protected] is working hard at cancelling trust into them. - Maybe they need to stop letting it's biggest members write their #PR? Cuz this is just [unacceptable betrayal!](https://infosec.space/@kkarhan/115011002487051208)

Infosec.Space

@linuxfoundation From the report: "the employees actually kind of fight with us against the Worker’s Council, because they want their data to be seen." (page 10) Yeah, as a Works Council member I know these discussions. We have to make sure the company follows the laws, the company doesn't want to so blames us.

FTR: As far as as I can see there is no 5 person rule in the GDPR, so without further context, I find this statement to be a little extreme.

@jwildeboer @linuxfoundation yep, no rule like that exists. It's a typical strawman against a law that limits the ability of corporates to hoard and process personal data.

I worked for a company that gets a large part of its revenue stream from data processing, and took a part in GDPR implementation for one of its services. It was not that hard, because we already adhered to existing data protection laws. Even in cases where we needed to store and process data, it was possible to anonymize all sensitive information that wasn't required to provide our service.

Anyone who claims that GDPR is bad and prevents progress has ulterior motives and shouldn't be trusted. I didn't expect @linuxfoundation to fall in that category though.

@shine @jwildeboer @linuxfoundation They just want to shill the #Cyberfacist garbage tech of their highest-tier members, which are the #GAFAMs...

https://infosec.space/@kkarhan/115010986088720245

Kevin Karhan :verified: (@[email protected])

@[email protected] I guess @[email protected] is working hard at cancelling trust into them. - Maybe they need to stop letting it's biggest members write their #PR? Cuz this is just [unacceptable betrayal!](https://infosec.space/@kkarhan/115011002487051208)

Infosec.Space

@linuxfoundation
Holy shit! You can kiss the progress of Linux good bye if this message reaches developers.

@CCC you should probably check out if this has anything to do with linus visiting gates a couple weeks back.

@linuxfoundation

is this a real account? Mastodon show the link in the bio as verified, but their account is not listed on the linked page.

@guenther It's there, on their about page, in glorious white-on-white, in the white area just above "stay connected with the linux foundation", because they couldn't find an icon and make the link visible without pissing off their gold sponsors! That was too haaaard.

@linuxfoundation

@linuxfoundation are you gone mad? GDPR is essential for open data. It ensures that open data can be used in a way that helps and does not harm others. It also hinders corporations to make a lot of money of people's data which is great too.
The @linuxfoundation claims privacy rules like EU's #GDPR “fuel a climate of risk aversion…[that] slows open data progress”.
#Microsoft, #Zuckerberg, #Samsung, & China's #Hauwei are ⅓ of #LinuxFoundation's top-tier platinum members.
… who does #LF serve? … the people & their privacy & their right to #SoftwareFreedom … or Big Tech? 🤔
A USA 501(c)(6) org serves “common business interest” of its USA members — not #FOSS users & developers.
https://fedi.copyleft.org/@linuxfounda[email protected]/114993371413443119
We must name the LF-ant in the room.
🄯 Copyleft.org Mastodon Instance

@bkuhn @linuxfoundation "Open data progress"... as in taking private info and making it "open"?

Weird.

@bkuhn A real shame that the FSF and OSI both shit the bed so badly. Closest thing we have to a large body that represents our interests are @eff (US), @openrightsgroup (UK) and @fsfe (Europe).

@diffrentcolours

I'm obviously biased in saying so, but I admit that I'm so sad you don't list #SoftwareFreedom @conservancy <https://sfconservancy.org/> in that list.

Also, I'm not aware of any work that @eff has done on #FOSS issues (e.g., #EFF has generally not supported #copyleft.)

I agree with your other assessments. Specifically, @fsfe is doing an excellent job particularly on EU policy — #SFC being a USA entity is partnered with them on EU stuff since it's their bailiwick.

Software Freedom Conservancy

The Software Freedom Conservancy provides a non-profit home and services to Free, Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) projects.

@diffrentcolours @conservancy @eff @fsfe fantastic use of the word 'bailiwick', @bkuhn
Ballyhooing of arcane adages is *my* bailiwick. I could never expunge them from my lexicon — no matter the celerity of @-mentions that captiously criticize my copious pontification with esoteric verbiage.
While this is risible and enigmatic to some — for me it is an audacious archetype of abstruse frivolity.
* * *
If you prepped for a 1990-era SAT, you surely get it! Why'd we memorize these words if not to use 'em?
To: @seabass
Also, @richardfontana @josh @novalis @mjd @karen may enjoy this!