Reminder: Many bsky links require a sign-in, and are, hence, useless to anyone who is not on bluesky.

I am not on bluesky. I have reasons not to be, that I won't bother rehashing for you.

If you want to share things on mastodon, you might want to consider using links that are usable by people who are on mastodon.

@GeePawHill
On the one hand: yes this gets annoying.
On the other hand: my impression is most ppl bridging over from BS just post as if it's all just one site. I know I do here on Mastodon, I.e. I don't think "this post is for those ppl on BS who follow me".
Does that make sense?

I wish they'd all come over to Mastodon, but like that the wonky bridging exists at all. Well done makers and maintainers of the bridge!

@Gurre When you post here, and someone on bluesky links to it, the receiver of the link can read it.

Do you get the difference?

@GeePawHill I do get the difference. It is annoying. But those BS users who post them make one post on BS where the link works and that post gets bridged to over here. It's not like they make separate posts aimed only at mastodon connections and put broken links in those.
@Gurre @GeePawHill
If I see an account posting mostly or exclusively Bluesky links, I just block them.
@Gurre @GeePawHill well then — if they're not worried about the fact that we can't see their links, and never come here to engage — why bother linking at all? they should just not do that?
@Gurre @GeePawHill Then I block them, if they care that little and are that lazy, don't need to waste time on their drivel.

@GeePawHill @Gurre You can absolutely copy a link to a fedi post that is followers only and will have other users (including accountless outsiders) be unable to read it without you realising because for the most part the little lock icon is barely visible.

It's mostly a UI problem with bluesky too — they do warn on the web interface that the link might be unusable without an account, but there's no visual cue about the quoted post.

Mostly nobody is doing this to spite fedi users, I'm sure.

@Gurre @GeePawHill There are a lot of folk on Bsky whom (?) I enjoyed following when on twitter, and it pains me that they didn't come here. I have signed up to bridgy but failed to persuade many Bskyers to do likewise. I see posts from maybe 4 Bskyers, but it's better than nothing. I do have a Bsky account but rarely use it, though I've found more useful responses to queries there than here a couple of times. Never seen a dodgy link in either except the scam post t'other day here.
@GeePawHill yeah I just ignore links from bs,fb, and X since I don't have accounts there.
@GeePawHill I have this convo w/ my husband regularly. "I can't read the quoted post there, sunshine, sorry"
@GeePawHill #mbin has the same issue, and it's a Fediverse service. So it's not just BSky.
@egoldblatt @GeePawHill Really? I can view my own posts on mbin without logging in

@GeePawHill I have unfollowed everyone on the bsky bridge, I don't follow those links, and anybody I do want to follow on bsky I use their RSS feeds through Feedbin.

I just don't have much interest in that network and find their corporate values consistently at odds with mine. 🤷‍♂️

@GeePawHill

Do you complain about links to paywalled pages, generally newspapers, because that's more prevalent.

@simon_lucy @GeePawHill I'm not the OP, but I'm similarly annoyed by them. Especially the NYT
@simon_lucy @GeePawHill Most links I see on the fedi to pay walled news sites have an archive.is or similar link alongside it or someone has provided it in reply. I think that the point made applies equally to news articles but I think social media links are more often shared without a way to get around the account requirement / pay wall in comparison.

@ZoDoneRightNow @GeePawHill

There are a few that do that but a tiny minority.

@simon_lucy I do, indeed. I also point out that regwall's aren't gift links.
@GeePawHill More than agree with the statement, also I hate when peoples post on mastodon links who end up to some articles behind a paywall or a subscription.
@GeePawHill

pro tip:

you can slap the links into
anartia.kelinci.net to get a JavaScript-optional, tracking-free and much faster read-only view of posts and profiles—without the login wall :)
Anartia

JavaScript-optional public web frontend for Bluesky.

@GeePawHill
It's even better when people think I'm going to try and click through when all they post is "I love this" and a link. Nope. Not happening. 🐒
@GeePawHill @LunaDragofelis i've tried to spread the word that requiring a sign-in to view your posts on blue sky is a useless feature since everything is public anyway, but of course people don't listen.
@GeePawHill I would put it in the same category as posting links to paywalled articles.

Not unforgivable, not necessarily even rude, but people should be aware of what they’re doing.