Yesterday was my first bad day on Mastodon, and what happened to me could happen to you, so let me explain what went down, and how I got blocked by a lot of people.

In March, I wrote a post critical of Musk (picture 1). I then asked another Mastodon user (Harriett) whom I have found friendly, if she would help me translate a Danish phrase to English, and linked to the Musk post where the phrase would be relevant.

But yesterday — 4 months later — that blew up in my face. Here is how…

1/7

You see, yesterday someone discovered that my old post requesting translation help had been mirrored onto Bluesky by the so-called bridge system. And that system had made the VERY unfortunate error of removing my link to the context about Elon Musk, and instead now linked to Harriett's profile page.

So it now looked as if I was not talking about Elon Musk, but talking about Harriett (see picture) — as if I was making fun of this Mastodon user behind her back on Bluesky.

2/7

A person saw this unfortunate mishap on Bluesky and rightly found it suspicious looking, so that person then warned Harriett about it. She then got upset thinking I was making posts ridiculing her on Bluesky, blocked me, and then wrote about this to all of us here on Mastodon.

I have no hard feelings about that, because the technical glitch really made it seem like I was a bad person.

But then more people got upset, and a whole thread formed where people agreed I should be blocked.

3/7

And while all of this went down, I was not even here. Because yesterday I hosted a party and was preparing dinner and entertaining guests here in Denmark.

Then late in the evening when the guests went home, I sat down to check in on Mastodon, and all of hell had broken loose.

Because everyone was thinking the Bluesky post came from me, the famous profile Gottalaff now entered the discussion which amplified it to her 33,000 users, and even more people blocked me, called me out etc.

4/7

The only person who stopped to check if all of this was really true was @Gargron. And he wrote a very helpful post explaining that the bad post on Bluesky was created by the bridge system, which had linked to Harriett's profile and thereby changed the meaning of my original post.

But Gargron's post was very technical, and I am not sure everyone understood it, and I was still getting angry responses, and more people blocked me.

So I was very sad to discover all this late last night.

5/7

But here is the lesson we can all learn from this: If you see something strange where someone suddenly seems to change their behaviour and do something malicious, it is important to ask questions before concluding what is going on.

In this case, a post which seemed like it was written by me was actually altered by an IT system that I have never given permission to do so — and it now seemed like I was spreading hatred.

In conclusion: I blame no one for this incident. I fully understand…

6/7

… why someone saw the Bluesky post and wanted to warn Harriett. I fully understand how Harriett could feel shocked that it looked like I was talking about her on another platform. And I fully understand how Gottalaff would amplify that and try to stop me from harassing Harriett.

So please, do not send any negativity their way. Let us just all learn from this:

Never jump to conclusions about other people. If you see sudden strange behaviour from someone, ask questions before concluding.

7/7

@randahl So sorry to hear this, how upsetting for you (and others). An important reminder to think critically, always, especially when there's something weird
@teadrinker fortunately these situations are VERY rare. I have been active here for two and a half years now, and this is my first "shitstorm”.
@randahl Agree that it's an overwhelmingly positive place!
@teadrinker @randahl I just read through all this, it is very unfortunate. Especially the people on Bluesky who amplified it without understanding what happened. I don't understand this bridging stuff either but it's something for everyone on the Fediverse to be aware of.
@randahl @Jennifer @teadrinker bridging considered harmful; I’ve done all I know about to avoid ny account being bridged, but who knows if there are still bridges around I don’t know about (to actively defederate) that don’t honour the #nobridge tag and things…

@randahl at least you can check off „Getting a shitstorm“ from your list. But I‘m not sure if that is something anybody would like to have on their list. 😬

Sorry to read about this.

@randahl @teadrinker some people legitimately believe that the way to make a better world by cultivating moralistic outrage and by enforcing a unity of perspective --> to them, this is okay as long as it is done passive-aggressively thru victimhood and not directly

@randahl fyi - some of the people in the discussion aren't actually angry over the misinterpretation/changing of the original post, but the fact that the post appears on Bluesky with photo and bio of the user in question ("doxxing").

... others are angry because they believe you don't care about the fact that her details appeared there but only worry about your follower count - while I think it's obvious that what upsets you is being presented publicly as a bad actor.

The awesome @Em0nM4stodon is PSAing about the first case here: https://infosec.exchange/@Em0nM4stodon/114870842797314328

... as for the second I think it's just fallout. Once people get the "bad actor" impression everything else will be interpreted that way as well.

Em :official_verified: (@Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange)

ALERT for Bluesky Bridge Users 🚨 🦋 If you are using a Bluesky bridge on Mastodon, DO NOT TAG Mastodon accounts in your posts without prior informed consent from this person. This could end up showing a preview of this person's profile picture and bio on Bluesky without their consent. Additionally, be careful about how the upcoming Quote Post feature could behave with Bluesky bridges. Some of us don't want our information shared with commercial platforms like Bluesky, and have not consented to this bridge. This practice can even **endanger** some Fediverse users. If you have chosen to share your own data with commercial platforms, make sure you leave the same choice to others. This is important. #Privacy #Mastodon #Bluesky #BlueskyBridge #Fediverse #Consent

Infosec Exchange
@troed stigma applies easily, but is hard to wash off.

@troed @Em0nM4stodon I really don't want to interfere in this situation and won't beyond making the following point, which I hope is helpful to Harriett who I care about and for the general good. My interpretation was that the doxing element caused the greatest distress.. something which I fear may have unfortunately been repeated in the explanation thread above. Perhaps don't repost that screenshot @randahl ?

Peace ✌️

@greenseer @troed @Em0nM4stodon

I understand your concern, and I have now blurred the post to avoid triggering a repeat of the bridge problem.

https://mastodon.social/@randahl/114872946452911714

@randahl @greenseer @troed @Em0nM4stodon
Unfortunately, this does not help. The bridge – as far as I understand – only bridges the original post and the post stays the same on Bluesky even if you edit it here on Mastodon.

@kuprijanko @randahl @greenseer @troed @Em0nM4stodon

Yep. The preview is cached.

You could try deleting the post, but I doubt that will matter to Bluesky.

@SpaceLifeForm I don't think it does. The bridged post on Bluesky is a standalone copy of the original post, and is not affected by whatever happens to the original post.

@numb_comfortably

We are on the same page. The problem was that the bridge software did not follow links properly.

It chased a link that was not needed to be searched.

@numb_comfortably @SpaceLifeForm that’s so much against the core value of consent on Fedi I don’t understand how these bridges even continue to be permitted, let alone used.

I certainly don’t want an independent copy of my posts copied to a different platform, especially not one like that.

@mirabilos @SpaceLifeForm it won't copy without your consent. You have to actively opt in at https://fed.brid.gy/
Bridgy Fed

Bridgy Fed is a bridge between decentralized social networks like the fediverse, Bluesky, and web sites and blogs.

@numb_comfortably @SpaceLifeForm except if you’re mentioned, and except other bridges…

@mirabilos @numb_comfortably @SpaceLifeForm

Hmm. This has me leary of bridges now. I will reconsider whether I wish to follow anyone at all on Bluesky.

@bruce @mirabilos @numb_comfortably

ConfortablyNumb is is apt handle.

Is there a RobotsTxt handle out there?

Not going to look, won't follow. /s

Not true. Bridgy Fed has always respected and bridged deletes. If you post on Mastodon and then delete it, Bridgy Fed deletes the bridged post on Bluesky too. https://fed.brid.gy/docs#delete

@SpaceLifeForm

Bridgy Fed

@snarfed.org ah, thanks for clarifying this, I did not know.
@troed @randahl @Em0nM4stodon I think that it's a blue sky/twitter/commercial social media issue when people worry about 'follower count'- generally, on here, most people don't give a toss how many people follow you. (I have a YouTube account, which now has 154 followers - it has taken me about 7 years to get that number, and I think that less than a dozen of them are bots, because I don't play their stupid numbers game.)
@randahl @Gargron People blocking you immediately without a chance of explaining are not really, ehm, wise.

@mihamarkic absolutely! 🙌

and it's really heartening to see that @Gargron got in on the case and wanted to help ❤️

Sorry you went through this unnecessary drama @randahl. Anyone who has been following you here knows you are not a bully! You couldn't be further from it. This behavior would have been so out of character and worthy of further verification/research. It's depressing to see how people are so ready to grab their (metaphorical) pitchforks without pausing first to analyze a situation

@_elena @mihamarkic @Gargron @randahl as instance admin i've been lurking, considering what to learn from this. Despite the bridged post loses context as an unintended consequence, calling it "unnecessary drama" for Randahl invalidates the consequences. It is an unnecessary burden for the person on the receiving end.

Randahl chose to bridge to bluesky. Will you, Randahl, remove the bridge knowing this unintended consequence now or continue using it?

@chartgerink what happened to @randahl is really serious and I did not mean to invalidate his experience with the words "unnecessary drama". What I meant is that something happened that was totally unnecessary and unintended - who could have predicted such a thing?

I bridged my GoToSocial account for about 2 weeks in January, but ultimately severed that tie. I did not think such a thing could have happened.

Randahl has all my solidarity and support in this.

@mihamarkic @Gargron

@chartgerink @_elena I opted out of the Bluesky bridge today.

I do not recall ever having opted in. But nevertheless it should now be sorted out.

@randahl @chartgerink @_elena

Can you share where one see the status of said Bluesky bridge and whether one is opted into it? Hope you don't mind the silly question - today I am a bear of little brain, and until now I thought bridging was something one had to set up on purpose...

Edit: oops, I found the link later in the thread - https://fed.brid.gy/docs#fediverse-get-started
Leaving it here for completeness.
I hope things calm down soon.

Bridgy Fed

@emmatonkin @randahl @chartgerink @_elena This link can be used to check if your account is bridged: https://fed.brid.gy/user-page
Bridgy Fed

@randahl I'm sorry this happened to you, but glad you wrote about it as a warning to others — about jumping to conclusions, and about using the bridge. Glad to hear you've opted out, which certainly seemed to be the thing to do.
@chartgerink @_elena @mihamarkic @randahl Funny to see @_elena agreeing that blocking without giving a chance to explain is bad, given that I'm blocked by her and I have no idea why 🫣 probably for saying something Bluesky related somewhere?… (sorry, couldn't resist)

@_elena @mihamarkic

👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽

@Gargron @randahl

@_elena @cruiser @mihamarkic @Gargron @randahl "Hurt people hurt people" - I know Harriet and she's not some trigger-happy person but when you see your identity, including your photo, show up in such a situation, most of us who have been on the wrong end of what is going on in the world would panic.

So, please don't judge someone because they panicked - they may have endured too much pain already and you don't know it.

@ics ZERO judgement towards Harriet, I can understand the panic.

My sadness (not judgement) was over other people not directly involved in the situation, who immediately grabbed their metaphorical pitchforks and were ready to condemn @randahl (without analyzing the situation).

Not everyone, obviously.

I am glad that the situation has now deescalated.

@cruiser @mihamarkic @Gargron

@_elena Sorry, then I had misunderstood your post. Yes, the other people's behavior was, indeed, weird-to-creepy for me.

I waited this out to see what the actual problem/situation is because I know both people involved and couldn't explain myself how something like that could ever happen.

We have blocked BlueSky-bridge on all our servers especially because we have no control over the bridge nor what happens on BlueSky - and this is proof again for me that we acted correctly there.

🙏

@randahl @cruiser @mihamarkic @Gargron

@ics no need to apologize, it's understandable. I'm really sorry about what happened - sorry for Randahl and also for Harriet. I think the block is a good move (I did it too... for Threads as well)
@_elena @ics I have not blocked it yet because there a couple of people I want to follow on bluesky but I never interact with them. If I need to answer I prefer connecting to bluesky and do it from there. It has never happened so far though.
@randahl I think, this bridging is sinply bullshit.

@mavori

yeah, don't use it
there were other concerns about it (which i can't remember, something about security)
i always have both tabs opened side by side and do manual copy-paste
@randahl

@pmj @mavori @randahl

Agreed, I don't use it and don't open posts that feature it.

Sorry to hear this happened to you, Randall. It sounds miserable for all concerned.

@randahl They removed their picture from their profile because they didn’t want it on Bsky, but this is the second or third time you’re posting it, which means third time you’re posting that picture on Bsky as well I presume (because of the bridge).

Maybe stop doing that? Maybe stop posting their bio and handle and everything over and over again?

@teotwaki @randahl
Agreed, that screenshot of the mistake should have been redacted.

It's good to provide screenshots showing what happened, but making sure it doesn't contain any personal information is important, also after you've been called out for exactly that. The first time may have been a technical glitch, this time wasn't.

@leeloo @teotwaki I understand your concern, and I have now blurred the post to avoid triggering a repeat of the bridge problem.

https://mastodon.social/@randahl/114872946452911714

@randahl as I understand it, the problem isn't that Harriet thought they you were poking fun at her, but that she very strongly preferred her profile and picture not being posted publicly on Bsky. Which obviously slipped by you as you just did it again...
@leeloo @teotwaki

@teotwaki I am not following this. What I see is a screenshot of a post with the profile photo in question blurred out, and the handle in an image that the bridge will not do anything special with, like linking the profile. What is the specific harm you are seeing in this post?

@randahl

@teotwaki Ah, great. The later replies were not visible from my instance. Thanks for clarifying. @randahl