🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯
“This happens when you develop weapons without using them.”
This kinda bolsters a cynical theory of mine that in modern times, wars occur when the military wants to test new equipment under battlefield conditions.
So yeah, I’m saying the military cudda talked crazypants outta this — but they wanted to try their new toy.
So there are actually reports that the bunker busters dropped on Iran were a bust???
@bronakins @peteriskrisjanis yes.
Examples:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/22/world/middleeast/iran-fordo-nuclear-damaged-not-destroyed.html
“…Caine told reporters Sunday that “initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage.”
@bronakins @peteriskrisjanis @davidaugust
Chekhov's Bunker Buster
@Lightfighter @peteriskrisjanis the GBU-57 series MOP used this last weekend had not been previously used in combat.
You're right, there were other bunker buster munitions used in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Well put.
Bunker busters are excellent as the name suggests...for bunkers.
What the US needs to develop is "Under the mountain, granite slab, take the elevator 20 storeys down" busters. 🙄
Which the warmonger industry will be happy to develop for 900 billion dollars....
@n_dimension you’re not wrong. Thank you.
The U.S. started developing these in about 2004, and has spent a pretty penny on that development. Each weapon costs about $3.5 million.
And they may not be working on their first combat use quite as intended. So that’s super great.
Waiting for new nicknames you come up with for warrior trump or conquering hero trump.
@bronakins whatever happens, I’ll add new nicknames when I have them to my @45names bot.