@Natasha_Jay @jen capitalism
there are court cases going on about the concept of "legitimate" in this
They, however, do concede that the other interests are illegitimate.
i think we need a time machine to go back and find the guy or gal who named them "cookies"
cookies are nice, in the real world
not so nice in web browser behavior
convince them to instead call them
"GPS unit your stalker magnetically attaches in the tire well of your car"
edit:
found them
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lou_Montulli
LOU MONTULLI WHAT THE FRACK
why "cookie"?
wtf
"In 2022, he was recognized among Hidden Heroes for his significant technology contribution, including the HTTP cookie and Lynx.[5]"
Hidden Hero. For the cookie.
to Lou's credit, the way he originally intended the cookie was probably originally just "this user prefers dancing hamster gif and not dancing baby gif when they visit your geocities page"
but the door to evil was opened
@benroyce The sigils were inscribed, the sacrifices were made, the Circle of Protection was drawn, but imperfectly.
"i just wanted to bake everyone some nice cookies!"
alas, the cookies contained radon and botulism
@benroyce @Natasha_Jay They seem nice, but they are addictive and will make you obese.
That's why it's important not to accept all cookies.
Just bear in mind:
You're the ingredients and the baker, and your user agent is the oven. They're eating. And not paying.
@benroyce "It was derived from the term magic cookie, which is a packet of data a program receives and sends back unchanged, used by Unix programmers."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_cookie says just "The term magic cookie appears in the man page for the fseek routine in the C standard library, dating back at least to 1979", so the answer seems to be Arcane C History Stuffโข. Lou isn't to blame!
@mathias @benroyce @Natasha_Jay "cookie" (as well as "magic cookie") derives from the biscuit. A quantum of data in a protocol is called a "packet". A cookie is effectively a receipt for the packet.
"I gave you an entire packet, you gave me back a cookie."
@Natasha_Jay What's that you say?
In return for me reading the click-bait, AI-written, totally devoid of facts piece of drivel you are trying to pass off as serious journalism (so, anything from the Daily Mail or NYT, then!), you want your 1853808642664 partners to be allowed to follow my every movement around the InterWebNets for the next 10 years?
Yeah, sounds good to me.
What's that?
Oh, 90% of them also want to track my physical location for a similar period?
Yeah, why not.
Oh, most of those want access to all my photos, call logs, messages, and emails?
Sure, what could possibly go wrong?
*throws phone in the bin*
Their Interests are legitimate . . . to earning those fat stacks of cash!!!
@Natasha_Jay I am ashamed to admit that it took me a while to realize you werenโt talking about the type of cookie vendors who supply baked delicious things.
I was racking my brain, trying to imagine what the interests of an illegitimate chocolate chip cookie vendor might be.
Same.
If I click 'refuse all' then does that also mean the 'legitimate use' ones?