Q&A from a talk I gave last week.
Q: "What do you think is the biggest threat in cybersecurity right now? Is it post-quantum computing? Is it AI?"
A: Fascism. It's fascism.
Q&A from a talk I gave last week.
Q: "What do you think is the biggest threat in cybersecurity right now? Is it post-quantum computing? Is it AI?"
A: Fascism. It's fascism.
@mapto @Homoevolutis0 @evacide
What difference?
@xinit @mapto @Homoevolutis0 @evacide
This question makes me remember this quote:
"Historians have a word for Germans who joined the Nazi party, not because they hated Jews, but out of a hope for restored patriotism, or a sense of economic anxiety, or a hope to preserve their religious values, or dislike of their opponents, or raw political opportunism, or convenience, or ignorance, or greed.
That word is "Nazi." Nobody cares about their motives anymore."
A. R. Moxon
@sleepfreeparent @mapto @Homoevolutis0 @evacide people are like, "don't pay attention to this, it is just a ploy to get your attention!"
I can pay attention to both their stupidity and their evil at the same time. Pointing out their evil is for us, pointing out their stupidity is for the people who might admire their tactics or their ruthlessness, and it gives the rest of us a laugh.
It's shockingly bad and entrenched software industry practices.
@celeste_42bit @hanscees @evacide
And it's already swashing over. SAP recently caved in to Trump. All, to stay off Agent Orange's bad side.
https://fortune.com/europe/2025/05/12/sap-rolls-back-diversity-dei-targets-trump/
Fragen und Antworten eines Vortrags von @evacide letzter Woche:
Frage: βWas denkst Du ist momentan die Γ€rgste Bedrohung bei IT-Sicherheit? Sind es Quantentechnische Entwicklungen? Ist es KΓΌnstliche Intelligenz?β
Antwort: βFaschismus. Es ist der Faschismus.β
(Γbersetzt ohne Google Translate o.Γ€.)
Der ΓΌbergriffige Zugriff auf Daten durch BehΓΆrden, Geheimdienste und Γ€hnlichem ist in der Regel nicht technisch, sondern nur durch Verfassungen, Gesetze und internationale Abkommen beschrΓ€nkt β Regeln, die bereits in Demokratien durch AuΓen-, Wirtschafts- und Innenpolitische Interessen ausgehΓΆhlt werden. Autokratien scheren sich da einen Dreck drum.
Datenschutz, Datensparsamkeit, Datenautonomie ist zwingend fΓΌr die Demokratie.
It is why I have been slowly building a list of digital services outside Us Jurisdiction. I cannot be certain how secure and safe it may be to use services here, especially if things get worse.
@fluchtkapsel Not @evacide but I would say that proper cybersecurity measures apply to the presence of many different types of threat actors.
Of course when the threat actor is your own government, or the government of a country which you rely on the good will of, that does introduce some *additional* considerations.
@evacide As always, idiocy of users.
Fascism or similar "easy thinking" is idiot's outcome.
@TigreVert @evacide The problem was here long before AI. It was even here before social media, though social media brought it to a head. It was here before Hitler, even. (The US inspired the Nazis. Read about Ford and Hitler, for example.)
We never cleaned up that mess. There are laws on the books *to this day* that explicitly legalize forced sterilization of disabled people in 31 states. (No, it isn't illegal in the other 19. 17 of them don't care either way. Only 2 make it illegal.)