Eleanor Saitta

@dymaxion@infosec.exchange
3.4K Followers
260 Following
6.6K Posts
Thinking about security, failure, change, art, and living. Recruiting barbarians; complicate your narratives. Fractional CISO to startups via Systems Structure Ltd. HEL/NYC/LON
Work Mehttps://structures.systems/our-team
Personal Mehttps://dymaxion.org
“The TAKE IT DOWN Act, while well-intentioned, was written without appropriate safeguards to prevent the mandated removal of content that is not nonconsensual intimate imagery, making it vulnerable to constitutional challenge and abusive takedown requests. Moreover, its ambiguous text can be read to create an impossible requirement for end-to-end encrypted platforms to remove content to which they have no access. https://www.techdirt.com/2025/04/28/congress-moving-forward-on-unconstitutional-take-it-down-act/
Congress Moving Forward On Unconstitutional Take It Down Act

Here’s a puzzle: How do you write a law that’s so badly designed that (1) the people it’s meant to help oppose it, (2) the people who hate regulation support it, and (3) everyone …

Techdirt

This is yet another case of an IRB basically deciding that people on the internet aren't real: https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1k8b2hj/meta_unauthorized_experiment_on_cmv_involving/

I am reminded of the University of Minnesota experiment a few years ago that sent deliberately bad patches to the Linux kernel, and the IRB decided this wasn't "human experimentation" so no consent was necessary: https://www.theverge.com/2021/4/30/22410164/linux-kernel-university-of-minnesota-banned-open-source

This should be obvious to everybody in the year 2025, but if it would be unethical to involuntarily subject a visitor to your campus to an experiment, then it is also unethical to do it on a message board or email list. You cannot enroll subjects in interventional studies without their consent. This should be absolutely clear to everyone on the IRB. But because you put the Internet in the middle, somehow they end up deciding it's OK after all.

You also should not perform experiments that violate the rules of the space you're operating in! That's also an ethical principle. These boundaries are also not less real because they are on the Internet.

#irb_failure #ConsentMatters

We are now deporting children with cancer without a hearing, without their medication. Children. Say again, "We are a country that deports innocent children ill with with metastatic cancer."

https://open.substack.com/pub/america/p/how-much-injustice-will-americans?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=720gx

How Much Injustice Will Americans Take?

A Saturday Prompt

America, America
There Is One Clear Winner In The Corn Vs. Solar Battle - CleanTechnica

Researchers claim putting solar on less than 4 percent of farmland used to grow corn for ethanol would benefit everyone, especially farmers.

CleanTechnica
Imagining if the History Channel had done a little less programming on “cool Nazi weapons” and a little more on “life before pasteurization” or “life in the iron lung, interviews with polio survivors”
People are, reasonably enough, upset that Trump fell asleep during the Pope's funeral. But having him fall asleep during major events with other world leaders is probably less damaging than whatever he might have done if he had been awake.
So, they're arresting judges now.
PSA for iOS Android users everywhere: it's fine to use biometric authentication to unlock your device. It helps you choose better passwords. So instead of turning fingerprint and face scans off completely, when you find yourself in a less secure environment, simply press the power and volume up buttons simultaneously for a few seconds. On iPhones, your phone will immediately require a password. For Android users, you'll need to click the lockdown button presented on the screen. Then, practice the move a couple times per week each week. #UsableSecurity

I'm seeing many people ask questions like "where are the people who are supposed to stop this?" and "what can *I* do about this?" I believe this sentiment is a symptom of the way our institutions are structured to deny us the lived experience of direct action.

The structures of liberal and capitalist institutions have so deeply taken over that most people in the US never even interact with a directly democratic institution, let alone become accustomed to making decisions that way.

I think there's a psychological consequence to never making decisions together in an assembly. We only ever experience taking and giving orders, buying products, and casting votes. We never learn the skills needed to act for ourselves, together. We never feel what it's like to build power together. We don't even know how to begin because we don't have an institutional toe-hold in our neighborhoods or workplaces. Our institutions have left us atomized and disempowered and we feel that helplessness in times like this.

#liberalism #capitalism #democracy #socialism

Intellectual monocultures function exactly like agricultural ones: impressive yields in the short term, catastrophic collapse in the long term. See: the New York Times.