RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7bmz7xxszqxdk6skvaxe3etx/post/3mo42k7orhs2c
Briefing: Data Security + more...
| Work Me | https://structures.systems/our-team |
| Personal Me | https://dymaxion.org |
Recently, a colleague (who would prefer to stay anonymous) told me that they got management to sign off on basically half a year of refactoring, tidying up code, and documentation.
How?
They said it was required work to make the codebase "AI ready".
It's fucking genius. If you can't stop the hype, just take advantage of it.
The FCC wants to make it impossible to buy "burner" phones, such as pre-paid phones not linked to your identity. They plan to do this by forcing all companies to store a ton of data about ALL phone users, including Copy of ID, and Verified address and a ton more info for both new & existing phone users, regardless of company or phone.

The FCC wants to legally force telecoms to collect new and renewing customers’ government issued identity number and physical address, impacting everyone from the privacy-conscious to domestic abuse survivors. “We never thought that would happen here.”
Boiling it down, every single request stemming from "age assurance" / "age verification" / "identity verification" is part of the slow but persistent fight against general purpose computing (itself but one front in the never ending struggle for human freedom)
The idea that you should be able to do anything without seeking permission from someone else is so abhorrent to some people they demand reality twist itself into absurdities to satisfy their need for authority.
Scanning tech would turn every phone into a surveillance device ⚠️
UK Ministers may claim this is to stop children sharing intimate images.
But it means forcing every adult through a digital ID checkpoint and scanning all private images by default.
Once the infrastructure exists, it will be expanded.
It would award every future government and every tyranny across the globe a mechanism to pre-censor everything anyone does with their phone.
They used to call economics the "dismal science" but for all the wrong reasons.
The real reasons are that economics are A) not a science, and 2) its directives have been consistently, painfully, costly, and dismally wrong.