Reid Hoffman: "I pissed off the majority of my users today. Here's what it taught me about B2B sales" /s š
What a prick he is
Reid Hoffman: "I pissed off the majority of my users today. Here's what it taught me about B2B sales" /s š
What a prick he is
āYou were put on this Earth to fart around, and donāt let anyone tell you any different.ā
@thomas_klopf @LockEx the original version of LinkedIn was, in fact, really good and useful (I was one of the first 1000 users of the site). Back then you could't just contact anyone and "connections" actually meant something - to reach someone you needed to ask for a referral from someone who already was connected to that person - which meant that both people had agreed to connect (you couldn't just "follow" someone)
it was slower but meant that people only passed on reasonable requests
@thomas_klopf @LockEx it also meant that over time as you referred people to someone, you also reconnected with each other and kept your connections up-to-date. It was also harder for someone on that early site to put up a fake profile (while now I can't trust that anyone on LinkedIn really is who they claim to be) especially since most people had ways to connect with each other outside of the site (if they truly knew each other)
But then people started gamifying the # of connections
He's right. I have no commitment to working more to help Reid Hoffman win.
@LockEx I'm committed to cooperating with my comrades and keeping us healthy and happy
The asshole can keep his capitalist wars with winning and losing to himself.
I created a social media site exclusively for pro-capitalist sociopaths guised as a way to help their minions get hired, AMA... 
@LockEx For context, he was talking about founders starting up a company and "what it takes."
That said, I still don't trust this attitude in general. I like working long hours making pedals (or rather, I just like something to occupy my time), but I never got into it to be successful, I got into it to make stuff because loud noises are fun. Anyone who hangs their hat on the idea sacrifice of everything is the only means to be successful is the first person to sacrifice employees, and shortly after, patrons for that continued "success."
i'm committed to winning a good work-life balance...
Funny. I never wanted work-life balance much, preferring work that kind-of consumed me, not because I was 'committed to winning' which is asinineā'[ā¦]the race is not to the swift,nor the battle to the strong,nor yet bread to the wise,[ā¦],nor yet favour to men of skill;but time and chance happeneth to them all.'ābut because I wanted to spend mine only life doing what seemed worth doing, and that seemed the best I could do.
ā¦but there should be other ways to live, for those as want them.
Reminder that all that work that people do (unpaid overtime, working on vacations, working weekends etc)
That is value added to billionaire wealth.
The same wealth that is frying the planet and ending democracy.
Ambition that doesn't directly benefit you is a waste of precious life span.
Thinking about this for some reason: https://beige.party/@RickiTarr/114090599350145493
Attached: 1 image Sometimes you know a job is toxic without ever having to work there.
Well, he's absolutely right. At least in his frame of mind of what 'success' means.
If your definition on success is that you control a hive of mindless corporate drones that work from at least 9 to 9 and that sure are greatful for the opportunity to sleep at home, sacificing everything for the almighty money god.
That's not my definition though and I try not to kinkshame.
But I did, didn't I. Sorry.