@coin @protonprivacy @stinerman
To be fair, this post from Andy was just after his controversial post about the Gail Slater nomination by Trump
@coin @protonprivacy @stinerman
Yes, and the controversial post was the day before that: https://x.com/andyyen/status/1864436449942110660
The controversy started last week following reposts by other people on Bluesky, Reddit and the Fediverse. But the original post was Dec. 4
Great pick by @realDonaldTrump. 10 years ago, Republicans were the party of big business and Dems stood for the little guys, but today the tables have completely turned. People forget that the current antitrust actions against Big Tech were started under the first Trump admin.
@protonprivacy that's cool, but your CEO was recently big-upping US republicans. What's up with that?
Are you a pro-authoritarian company, or is that 'just' the CEO's personal stance?
Our CEO pointed this out himself not long ago over on X:
https://x.com/andyyen/status/1864672128580083926
As a Swiss organization, Proton is not controlled by any individual, but by the board of our non-profit foundation, which has neutrality in its governing principles.
@protonprivacy so then, the position of the board is 180 degrees opposed to the position of the CEO on some very important topics. Because it's clear from your CEO's (earlier) tweet, as well as some in-depth doubling-down on reddit, that he is not politically neutral at all.
Shouldn't this be grounds for finding a new CEO? Will the board hold a discussion/vote over this?
@dieTasse @bazkie @protonprivacy
That "drama" isn't over yet because there was no excuse and no explanation about what it mean. Other than a political view, that's mostly a privacy and security problem. The CEO stand for someone who's one of the most privacy threats. And the presence of Musk is frightening in that matter.
Other than Andy's political call was factualy false, it's mostly against @protonprivacy primary mission. The fact that he don't see it is alarming and questioning.
@bennyccp @protonprivacy if you dive into the details of this situation on reddit - there's various comments on there from both Yen and "Proton team" - you'll see they are pretty much on the same page - pro republican, enthusiastic about Vance, and non-apologetic about it.
That's pretty black and white if you ask me. The board isn't neutral - they are on the same page as Yen on this. Proton is a pro-republican company.
I'm not sure where you see much nuance in this situation, but feel free to shine a light on it
@vmixx @DarthAstrius other than social positions, corporate dems and republicans are pretty much the same.
Vicky Nulan destabilizing foreign governments is not any different or better than John Bolton and his hawkish ideas.
One being slightly preferable than the other on some positions doesn't make any significant difference.
@clerian @danieltoth @protonprivacy
That's pretty sad. He has the possibility the explain or excuse himself but he didn't either.
That's hard to trust the service anymore. I'm thinking of it myself. I feel betrayed and I hope my stuff isn't already sold somewhere.
@scuttlebutt You are right.
Thanks. But sadly its only for iOS and it costs money.
"Ivory is Subscription-based.
Ivory is free to download, but requires a subscription to use. Subscriptions include a totally free 7-day trial to allow you to evaluate its features in full. Outside of the trial and subscription, the app is limited to one account and limited to read-only mode. We offer monthly and yearly subscriptions to Ivory for iOS + iPadOS, as well as a Universal subscription that also adds access to Ivory for macOS."
Trump against BigTech. I cannot understand what bring you to think that. HE's there for the BigTech. They all there, they pledge for him. Trump already secure the BigTech and push to put more spying infra and help the BigTech to be able to do it more.
That's just factualy false. Where did @andyyen found this?
@protonprivacy @action_jay What is the board’s stance on this?
I understand that PR mistakes can happen, but your response feels far from transparent. You deleted the original post and I don’t see you addressing the issue directly as the Proton Foundation.
The original post was published under Proton account: http://web.archive.org/web/20250115165213/https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/113833073219145503
A trustworthy approach would be: mistake → acknowledgment → apology → clarification. Instead, it looks like you’re trying to sweep it under the rug.
@jonah@neat.computer Corporate capture of Dems is real. In 2022, we campaigned extensively in the US for anti-trust legislation. Two bills were ready, with bipartisan support. Chuck Schumer (who coincidently has two daughters working as big tech lobbyists) refused to bring the bills for a vote. At a 2024 event covering antitrust remedies, out of all the invited senators, just a single one showed up - JD Vance. 1/2
@protonprivacy you need to remove your fascist-simping CEO.
I will not be re-upping when my subscription is up, and I've been a STAUNCH supporter for years.
I will not be suggesting this service to anyone any longer as all trust has been voided.
@protonprivacy supporting anyone in the party CURRENTLY throwing Nazi salutes in public is 100% inexcusable and anyone doing it is not to be trusted.
We can no longer trust your org with our data, regardless of any PR statements until your fascist promoting CEO is removed.
2 new clients hold up. 3 other people think of canceling. That's my close life right now. @protonprivacy was quickly gaining space around me and will soon disappear is they didn't fix that trust issue.
@protonprivacy but like Big Tech...
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/1i1zjgn/so_that_happened/
I switched to Tuta today.
Financing someone who praises Trump in any way shape or form (and not apologizing when getting called out) doesn't align with my moral compass.
Luckily I own my domains so it was pretty easy to do.
@protonprivacy spare me, I used to recommend proton to people looking to leave Google, now I'll recommend tuta or self hosting with #nextcloud