Always remember:

1. This ban happened because successive US Presidents Trump and Biden disliked the speech that was taking place on TikTok. No other reason.

2. Maybe you don't use TikTok. If the US Government can do this to TikTok, it can *and will* do it to whatever thing it is you like. This is true *even if the TikTok ban never goes into effect*. The U.S. now has a loaded, functioning weapon against free speech, and the next person who gets to use it is Donald Trump

https://www.ctvnews.ca/business/article/us-supreme-court-upholds-law-banning-tiktok/

U.S. Supreme Court upholds law banning TikTok

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against TikTok on Friday in its challenge to a federal law that would have required the popular short-video app to be sold by its Chinese parent company ByteDance or banned in the United States on Jan. 19.

CTVNews
@mcc I don't have deep expertise on this, but I really haven't come across arguments for banning tiktok that had to do with the type of speech taking place on that platform. Can you point to more context on this?
Taco Blacc (@[email protected])

The "national security" claim is wildly xenophobic bullshit, American companies data appetite is no different, and any actor who wants data on us regardless of reason can just fucking buy it. That law was just a favor for Zuckerberg.

kolektiva.social
@b_cavello thanks for this, I had similar questions. Kind of weird from a cybersecurity perspective to see them call defense against Chinese nation-state cyber objectives xenophobic, considering the decades of evidence that China has supported all kinds of cyber exploits and has had access for we-don't-know-how-long at the network hardware level to all kinds of communications at the highest level. Like yo, do a little looking before you just make assumptions.
cc @mcc @psychoalpastor
@b_cavello that being said, the bill as a favor to the Zuckmeister is spot on, glad you brought it up @psychoalpastor. That part rings true. I'm thinking it could be both.
cc @mcc

@fixiemama @b_cavello @mcc

I'm not prone to taking the word of the government that they care about our safety seriously. Also I'd rather not be a participant in these power games anyway, the poor can't eat or take shelter in national prestige.

@psychoalpastor Right, well in this case it's taking their word that they care about _their_ safety, that also happens to be our safety too.

I didn't come here to argue so I hope it doesn't sound that way. The poor sure can't take shelter, like you said. But we should have some idea wtf is going on. Especially in places where our vote still means something!

@fixiemama @b_cavello @mcc @psychoalpastor The DNI had specific & credible reasons for allegedly. Whatever it was it seemed convincing to the SSCI. As did it to every federal judge in closed chambers.
@Beggarmidas yah it's been a high-risk app for a while now.
@fixiemama I still vividly remember what a bunch of islamic terrorists were capable of accomplishing half a world away 15 years ago with little more than some savvy website design & facebook groups. Hell, or more recently look at all the cookies Q-anon cooked into doing wacko shit.
It's absolutely weaponizable.

@Beggarmidas

Hence the problem. From out here all we get is "just take our word for it".

Uh... no 😐

@psychoalpastor This is one of those dodgy areas where public interest is at odds with national security. I understand your frustration, but you can't expect them to let a highly valuable sources get killed just to satisfy your curiosity or mollify your misgivings. China is universally heavy handed about anyone it even slightly suspects. If memory serves at last count the fallout from a 2010 intelligence failure alone was over 200 lives.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010%E2%80%932012_killing_of_CIA_sources_in_China
2010–2012 killing of CIA sources in China - Wikipedia

@Beggarmidas

The conversation is claims that the Chinese government uses Tiktok as an intelligence tool and you link me to an example of American spying in China being exposed 🤦🏿‍♂️ Gee, wonder why China would care so much...

Like I told the other person, I'd rather not be involved in these global influence games at all. We as human beings should work towards a world where they no longer happen.

@psychoalpastor I remember what terrorists were capable of getting some kids to do half a world away with savvy website design, SEO tricks & facebook groups kid. 15 years ago DAESH/ISIS/ISIL got a bunch of vulnerable folks with zero previous connections to them to commit terrorist acts. https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/daesh-recruitment-how-the-group-attracts-supporters/184
I also vividly remember, as should you what Q-anon could trigger a bunch of folks into doing.
Maybe consider some larger context. If you can put your reactionary feelings aside momentarily
StratCom | NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence Riga, Latvia

@psychoalpastor If you're complaining about countries gathering intelligence then you're pissing in a high wind with your mouth open. Every country does it, and needs to do it. Don't rush to China's defense, they spent a solid decade & a half compromising our entire establishment up until Operation: SHADYRAT shook us up enough to get our eye back on the ball. Up until 2013 they had an ear pretty much everywhere they wanted to hang one.
@psychoalpastor Nor do they just use that intel for military & diplomatic concerns like we do. They have a whole system approach that combines everything from patent theft to give their own inner circle owned companies market advantages. Imagine if the CIA shared any tidbits they ran across to fortune 500 companies they might find useful. China does that.
Why are you defending an authoritarian pack of rat bastards like the PNC? You just enjoy being a disposable stooge or something?

@Beggarmidas

The CIA literally has it's own investing arm
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-Q-Tel

No, I do not support the government of China, I don't support any government at all. If them & the US are doing the same thing I'm not going to claim one is The Good Guys. I just live here, I didn't ask for any of this and would gladly see it all stop. I'm sure plenty of people in China feel the same way.

In-Q-Tel - Wikipedia

@psychoalpastor are you shitting me? Yeah. No shit. The CIA invests cash in companies that develop products for the USA-18/IC group. The DoD has it's own constellation of vendors it pays to develop things relevant to it's focus too. Jay-sus kid. You're not clear headed enough to view this objectively at all. You just went and pulled a blind reference you didnt understand, didn't you? Just to pull a halfassed 'uhmactually'.

@Beggarmidas

Blind reference? You say Chinese intelligence manipulates markets & then US intelligence doing the same thing is a blind reference?

Never mind, we're done here. Wave your flag all you want elsewhere.

@psychoalpastor You're done here because you don't have a case. Don't play this sour grapes routine as though you graduate on any moral high ground, kid. I don't buy it. This is shit way over your capacity to evaluate. You lack the context to hold an informed conversation on it. No insult intended. Its it's own world. So I wouldn't expect you to. If you'd like to learn more about the DNI I can point you in a few directions to more fairly evaluate what they do & how.
@psychoalpastor But china has most definately released details to it's own PRC groomed companies that it could only have gleaned from listening into corporate board meetings. They do it all under one roof. Fuck, they facilitate it so much that party loyal companies have a fucking HELPDESK for interracting with their spies archives. The citation you GAVE kid was their VENDORS. Our agencies get their gear & software & associated stuff from private sector companies. Just like our military does.
Lawmakers Admit They Want to Ban TikTok Over Pro-Palestinian Content 

Lawmakers hint that potential TikTok ban was motivated by desire to curb pro-Palestinian content on social media.

Rolling Stone

@mcc sorry, I believe point no. 1 is not completely accurate - I believe this is not as simple as you put it. Aside from the speech used on TikTok, there are legitimate security concerns around the data of US citizens being harvested off TikTok that is being sent to servers in China that are owned by the Chinese gov't. I have read a few reports that there is a dark purpose to the data being gathered - that the Chinese gov't is using this data to build psychological profiles of non-Chinese nationals to be weaponized in the future. Also, the spread of disinformation (not only from China) and attacks on specific groups is well documented, even in the national media. There's also the mental toll that social media takes on people (generally), especially among younger generations. Then there's the conversation around espionage, theft of IP, political manipulation, etc.

It's a dangerous app at many levels. The same argument can be said against the likes of Facebook, X, Snapchat, etc.

Even Trump has flipflopped - he's the one who enacted an outright ban and block of TikTok being installed on ANY US gov't system or device owned by a gov't employee because of the reasons I noted above (among others). But recently he said something in an interview along the lines of "TikTok is a great platform. I won 34% of the young vote because of TikTok".

To further clarify - This ban is not also a "block" for consumers. It simply means that TikTok can no longer use US hosting services or have their app listed in US app stores. Consumers will still be able to use the app, but they won't get app updates (leaving them vulnerable to attacks without proper patching), and the user experience will be degraded due to hosts being moved outside of the US. It also means user data is now offshore...not within our boarders. That should scare people even more.

Personally, I stand behind this ban. I do agree with point no. 2 though. The US has been doing things like this for decades. Most of it just isn't public knowledge.

@Geekmaster @mcc Totally agree. Bad take by OP to say there’s no other reasons. There are. It’s this. It’s a national security issue.
@Geekmaster @mcc What surprises me the most is when the US banned Kaspersky people were very understanding as to why, but when it comes to Tiktok they make it sound like there aren't any better alternative's and the "national security risks" are just US propaganda. Like what??

@Twitom Right! Come on sheeple! GET IT TOGETHER!!  
And, agreed! No one made any noise about Kaspersky because: Russia. China is at least as bad, if not worse in some ways, especially from a cyber perspective. I guess the difference of "security software" vs "social media platform" makes a difference?? 🤷 I personally don't see a difference - a bad actor, is a bad actor. Period.

I heard a great phone prank on the radio the other day about this topic...the DJ doing the phone prank told the influencer "have you thought of using Pinterest" in a real condescending sing-songy voice 😂 it was hilarious!

@mcc This doesn’t really explain the 9-0 Supreme Court ruling.

@mcc Or that the ban is favored by the American people by ~ 2 to 1.

Honestly. I’m giving the side eye to anyone who comes out in favor of TikTok without strong arguments, and these arguments sounds more like social media bluster than anything substantive.

@Justadog @mcc Im pro tiktok because of our stance historically regarding an open marketplace.

I feel the ban was enacted because of a confluence of pressure from competing industries and propagandists flailing for any rationale to explain a rise in anti Israeli sentiment

I find the national security concerns laughable considering what else we allow around here.

The rest of the world can do what they like but here in the states, we are allowed an abundance of bad ideas. I prefer it myself

@Justadog @mcc I'm not a lawyer, so don't completely believe what I'm saying, but from reading the opinion, this is how I understand it:

Both creators and ByteDance were petitioning. The former has no standing because the law doesn't regulate them. The latter didn't provide a case that equates corporate regulation (the divestiture requirement) with direct regulation of expression. The Court didn't want to "break new ground", so it's not a 1st amendment issue.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-656_ca7d.pdf

@mcc sorry, I don’t buy your premise in point 1 at all. I don’t think it’s absurd that the government would balk at the idea of a geopolitical adversary controlling a hugely popular social media platform.

There’s zero evidence that it’s because of speech. Trump’s initial move to block it six years ago was, but that went nowhere, and even he walked that back before the end of his first term.

This ban is not the same thing. Different people, different motivations, different outcome (maybe)

@RyanHyde @mcc there is some evidence it has to do with speech.

Here's the arguments

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2024/24-656

@mcc
Incorrect. You forgot security issues stemming from the TikTok maker giving the Chinese government open access to users' data. That's the primary reason. The two you mentioned are much less important than that.
@sloanlance @mcc Thats only on the chinese version of the app, Douyin iirc.
@sloanlance @mcc
This government had 4 years to plan and pass a law to protect US data like GDPR, they choose not to. Instead they tried to ban Tiktok and drove user back to US-grown platforms that are also privacy nightmares.
In a country where online ad bidding and data broker run rampant, any adverse entity could just buy the data they want on the market, how is just banning Tiktok going to help protect USian's data?
@sloanlance @mcc The thing is that *US* companies sell open access to user data to _anyone_ who can pay _all_ _the_ _time_ . I'm willing to believe that TikTok represents an extra level of threat because it's not even theoretically under the jurisdiction of the US government or an ally they can influence, China is a geopolitical rival who is happy to infiltrate US and allied systems for political advantage, and while surveillance capatalism apps are *all* some level of bad, the TikTok app platform might be an unusually virulent level of bad, but I'd really like some sort of verifiable analysis which shows exactly whats up, rather than "trust me bro", or it does seem like the decision is influenced by Sinophobia as much as legit security concerns.
@mcc just don't forget that a lot of amercians migrated to Little Red Book aka RedNote
@mcc free blocklist included in the comment section of your post
@mcc I wouldn't forget the 7.6 million meta spend lobbying to get tiktok banned.
@mcc Trump *likes* TikTok now - the CEO is sitting on the VIP platform with Musk, Bezos and Zuckerberg at the inauguration that I shan't be watching Monday, because it's also MLK Day. If Michelle Obama isn't going to be there that's another good reason.
@mcc yep. This is literally the Red Scare all over again…

@mcc I think there were other reasons.

Tiktok didn't adhere to the "approved list of advertisers" and a bunch of people now know what Temu is.

That was a problem for the industrialists who run this place

@mcc I will admit, I’m not sure what speech was happening on TikTok that wasn’t also happening on basically any other mainstream social media platform 🤷‍♀️ kinda just seems like US politicians saw a seemingly-Chinese social media platform gaining as much traction as US social media, while pulling all the same bullshit that most every other big US social media platform does, and we’re like “we can do that, but we can’t let them do that!”
@mcc I think it's a lot simpler than all that. Facebook didn't want the competition, so they lobbied the government to ban it in the hopes that the tiktok users would migrate to Reels. Joke's on them, though, since everyone is heading to an app that's literally in China.

@mcc
Tiktok in USA ?
Good !

X on China ?
Bad ?

Where is the razon ?

The people were packeted by the instituitions everywhere, were transformed in data !

A digital evil is a reallity.

Humanity ?
No !

WAR !

@mcc @marcoarment Frankly I’m not sure what the law says in respect of Trump matters much anymore. He’s avoided jail time, conviction, and been re-elected. He is about to start a trade war with Canada despite renegotiating a free trade agreement. So frankly what does it matter.
@RochRipley @marcoarment When I refer to "precedent" above I intended this to be interpreted more in terms of human social systems than in terms of legal precedent.
EU investigates TikTok over alleged Russian meddling in Romanian vote

Romania's election was cancelled after thousands of TikTok accounts were activated backing a little-known candidate.

@mcc na, it's just regular old people panic about what the young people are doing
TikTok’s Pro-China Tilt

A bill that will force the app’s Chinese owners to sell will soon become law.

The New York Times
Basically the US supreme court decided that only your own country is permitted to spy on you and software from other countries must be divested and cannot be used in your country.

I'm in Australia.

Did anybody think this through?
@mikedev Personally i find AUS infosec law to be very frightening, as a potential user of AUS software and cloud products
Do people post worthwhile content there? I thought it was just a site were people could appear to be interesting by using filters and animations.

It does seem that the Chinese are going to pay US politicians so they can "enjoy" 1st amendment treatment. That's amusing in itself.

Nobody gave us the right to free speech, maybe they should consider doing something if they care so much about free speech.

@mcc

No, hahaha, it ia run by the Chinese military.

@mcc I wish people would stop chatting about #TikTok and start to use that energy to convince TikTok users to join the #Fediverse !

#Mastodon
#PixelFed
#PeerTube
#Misskey
#Loops

@mcc Incorrect. We (the USA) had specific and credible sources on this one. It came by way of the DNI, not FBI. So revealing the sources would have likely proven fatal. Even some savvy hacker types had worked it out last year based on what was being selectively advanced during the Gaza incursion. Or that groups like falun gong which are LEGAL in the USA always had their content shadowbanned. Sorry, you got taken for a ride. Be mad at the actual source. Beijing & the PNC