@evacide I wonder how hard it would be to try and determine if 'I am not interested in debating this' increases the number of replies or not?
Like actually have for each post federating it with and without that bit and see which version generates more replies.
@evacide At least for some of those other platforms, it may a sign they're dying from lack of non-automated participation.
I noticed after I came to Mastodon, it soon became the only place people would respond, even when the same post was made on the Birb too. I eventually gave up cross-posting to the Birb because there were no longer signs of life there. Since you have a much bigger audience, that's probably why it took you longer to notice.
I've been on Xitter, Facebook, Instagram, Substack, etc.
I think there is some validity to the theory that you are getting more human engagements here in general than on the other platforms-- or at least, that's a part of the reason.
My Likes/RTs/comments tend to be 8-15 times higher here than on the other platforms, even when I have had far more followers there than here. They aren't necessarily disagreeing, but they are at least showing they read it.
Would you say that your interactions in general are higher in number, or just the debating?
@evacide I recall Twitter being a lot like this for me, back before the leno kmsuc days.
Huh. I should try it here and see what happens.
I'm glad you wrote that post. I really enjoyed going through the responses.
🤓
@evacide Every time I see a hot take about how the Fediverse is for conversation and not publishing and turning off replies is an antipattern I get more radicalized about this.
I should be able to turn off replies from specific accounts. I should be able to force accounts to ask me to reply. I should get to pre-vet their comments. I should be able to delete their comments.
Every art gallery site I use lets me delete comments under my posts. It's great and helps me foster healthy communities
@phil hm. I'll take a closer look then when I get more free time. I'm really not interested in self hosting, but I have been getting a bit frustrated lately that Mastodon is moving so slowly..
And while I'm not going to switch out of a community like gulp.cafe just for better software, I'm only on .social so that I know my normy account is reachable, so I don't really care about being hosted here, I'm a lot more open to migration.
@phil I understand that Gotosocial makes it easier, but there's a limit to how easy they can make it. Even if it's just a bash script I need to get a domain name and keep a computer up to date.
I self host on my internal network all the time, but needing to worry about reliability and needing to expose a computer to the public web (either by punching a hole or by setting up a VPS) just makes things more work to think about.
@evacide Honestly, I should just mute the phrase "I am not interested in debating this", any toot containing it isn't worth reading.
It's someone making an assertion, but being unwilling to defend it, which is just wasting everyone's time.
Well-reasoned argument might rarely change minds, but cross-shouting contrary assertions never does; it just stokes division and violence.
Some of us have *opinions* and we just wanna tell you all about them.
Block early, block often.
@RiaResists
That's not true.😁
Want to discuss this?
LMFAO 🤣 🤣 🤣
@evacide Not sure how sarcastic your tweet (skeets or toots are not even good, you're like children who think they can be cool, enough already) was but here goes.
Twitter was once a great debating ground, full of fun until the scoldy identitarian left weaponised safety to remove any dissenting voices. Then came Mastodon where all the loony techies went - a great place if you like fellow minded, mildly to wildly scoldy autistic techie people.
Threads took the 'I just want business conference chat, nothing unsafe, lets just pass the telling each other how WE are changing the world' sort of people, generally anxious but not autistic people.
Then came the great Bluesky who took the scientists and journalists who were tired of the Nazis on Twitter but comfortable with the 'chug piss' trans activists on Bluesky (you don't believe me but the boys and girls really seem to like it there https://bsky.app/search?q=%22chug+piss%22 ). There is a reason it's real name is Blueski...
Anyway back to your question - Different social media platforms seem to have developed distinct community cultures and approaches to debate. Mastodon often attracts tech-focused users who can be quite direct (thoughtless?) in their communication styles. Twitter's debate culture has evolved significantly over time. Threads appears to have cultivated a more business/professional networking environment, while Bluesky has drawn many academics and journalists looking for specific types of discourse.
@evacide I think there's an XKCD explaining this: https://xkcd.com/386/ , even if they're the people who are actually in the wrong.
The internet is full of contrarians.
@evacide happens everywhere to be honest.
"Do not" doest offer directions.
"I do not want to discuss this" means people will want to know why not, its how we were conditioned