Europe followed the US into Afghanistan. Then US voters elected Trump and he pulled the plug.

Europe let the US lead the defence of Ukraine. And now US voters have voted for Trump, who wants Putin to win.

Europe has centered it's security politics around a US led NATO, and American voters have now voted for Trump, who wants to pull out of NATO.

It is time for a stronger, more capable, and fully independent Europe.

For our generation, this is our Churchill moment — it is time to lead.

@randahl Yea, Europe should, my fellow Americans are goddamn idiots.

@randahl
With European politicians and journalists still using twitter, I can't see this happening. Russia has all the tools to spread misinformation and fear in European nations. Not to mention acts of terrorism.

As of today we are royally fucked. But I hope you're right and this will be the day of awakening.

@randahl You're the free world now. Show us how it's done.

@Rainne @randahl I hope so.

But after Ukraine falls, Poland, Czech and Germany are next. I don’t think Europe is prepared for this

@dave @Rainne @randahl Poland alone has a larger and better army than Ukraine. And Poland is part of NATO so an attack on Poland will definitely trigger article 5. Russia will need Trump's support for more than 4 years before he can take on the not-US part of NATO. Especially now Ukraine is still depleting Russian stockpiles of old Sovjet material.

@Walter8100000 @Rainne @randahl maybe. I keep wondering if article 5 actually means anything, if there is actually no NATO to be triggered.

but you’re probably right. The Baltics are gonna come first.

@randahl

Not the UK though, they voted to Leave the EU, and it will take all 27 EU Nations to agree to let us back in, why would they when we slated their people and Brexit crashed the UKs economy?

@lyndamerry484 @randahl For me, the UK will always remain a member of the EU, whether it wants to or not 😉

@lyndamerry484

Awww thank you! ❤️

@frdl

"They" were 26% of the population, so so many of us were heartbroken in 2016.

@SophieTrades @lyndamerry484 @frdl I was a kid when we joined the EU and grew up loving everything about it. Now sleeping the impact the lack of freedom of movement has had on the next generation make me weep for the sheer stupidity of easily led racists and fury at those who lied for pure political and personal gain.

@Offbeatmammal @SophieTrades @frdl

I had started work and I know my wages and employment right benefited from being in the EU.

@Offbeatmammal @lyndamerry484 @frdl

So easily led. I cried in 2016 from frustration and utter disbelief. Some of the people I knew had voted leave and their reasons were so random, with little thought of the consequences.

Many now realise they were fooled, but that doesn't change the fact that deep down, it was racism.

@SophieTrades @Offbeatmammal @lyndamerry484 @frdl Same here.

"Trump says it like it is," was what they said in 2016. Then you listen to what the man was saying and, "What??? You agree with that???"

Question them further and it turns out they're not so convinced of the stupid stuff...mostly just the racism and de-humanization.

@SophieTrades @lyndamerry484 @frdl 50% of the UK population didn't care what the outcome would be. Only 25% wanted to stay in

@Walter8100000 @SophieTrades @frdl

Stay in the EU, that was 48% in, to 52% out, and most of those that voted out are now crying over inflation and higher interest rates.

@lyndamerry484 @SophieTrades @frdl ok, so only 24% of the population wanted to stay in. Like I said before, 50% didn't care

@Walter8100000 @SophieTrades @frdl

Sorry I am not sure where you are getting 24% from.

52% of those who voted, voted to Leave the EU.
48% of those who voted, voted to stay in the EU.

@lyndamerry484 @SophieTrades @frdl Sorry, I thought that brexit vote had only a 50% turnup but officially it's 72,2%. Don't know where I got that 50% from. Maybe that was in the 18-40 age-group 🤔
So officially 28% didn't care, 34,5% wanted to stay and 37,5 wanted out.
@SophieTrades @lyndamerry484 @frdl and who fucked it up? Those who didn’t vote.

@nobrainnopain @SophieTrades @frdl

And who gave us Brexit?

The 3% of racist voters in the UK who never voted for anyone or anything before they got the chance to do Farage's dirty racist work for him, and Putin.

@lyndamerry484 @randahl I think the EU would welcome the UK back.

They would just not get thee same rebates as before.

@lyndamerry484 @randahl We can still work together.
I don’t know about you, but it’s not like I hate the UK now, much less all its people.

@amayer @randahl

I do not hate the UK people, I am in the UK, but I feel the same about our Boris Johnson/Brexit voters as I do about the USA Trump voters, sad people who had/have no idea how much damage they have done to themselves.

@lyndamerry484 @randahl Right.

But you said "not the UK though" as if we couldn't work together because you are no longer in the EU.
That's what I disagree with. The stupidity of Brexit notwithstanding.

@randahl it was always time to lead. Why did you vote for followers?

@randahl

I just hope there's time

@randahl First of all, we must learn from the US' mistakes.

It is time to ban X.

It is time to hold Google and Meta accountable for the way they promote far right speaking points - or better yet, impound their property and ban them too.

We are going to fail in exactly the same way as the US, because a democracy is only as strong as the information level of its people.

And EU people are dropping fast.

@androcat @randahl I also think like that now. I used to be a free speech absolutist based on the horrors that Communists did to stifle it, and once supported that fascist that runs Twitter. But now I understand: Fascism must be banned, deplatformed, censored by all possible means, otherwise it takes over. This is much more important than the freedom of speech. Even despite the danger of the slippery slope.

@nicetux @randahl Yeah. It is so easy to make up a lie. And so hard to formulate an accurate rebuttal.

It's mathematically a losing game.

The signal to noise ratio is extremely harsh. There is so much noise.

@randahl Stop Scholzing about and time to LEAD, indeed.

@randahl the problem is that this won't be possible on a short notice, and that means REFORUSA will be necessary as an act of self- and mutual defense.

  • Not just for the EU, but also everyone else who relies on the USA's military and thus nuclear deterrent to not be turned into a footnote in history books: South Kore, Japan, Taiwan, Philiphines, ...

Sounds radical, but if Trump were to be let into office, he'll speedrun dacism, democide and genocide so fast that he'll turn Hitler into a Lukashenko Cosplayer by comparison...

@randahl I agree. America cannot be counted on.
@randahl Wait until Europeans figure out that "a stronger, more capable, and fully independent Europe" means drastic cuts in social services, education, medical care, etc. If you think you knew what "austerity" looked like before, wait until you start flushing 5% of your collective GDP down the insatiable maw of the military industrial complex.
@gpilz @randahl Remembering when it was over 4% during the cold war. We had a functioning welfare state back then. It's a choice.
@gpilz I grew up during the 1950/60s..
we spent some 5/6% on defence..
we had a great NHS, education and SS were not perfect but very functional
However we didn't have multiple TVs, mobile phones and so many other "extras"
But we still had a good and functioning manufacturing/industrial base.. which we've lost.
But needs must.. without security ALL is lost that we value.
@hindsight The U.S. was the only combatant in WWII to emerge with its industrial base intact. Of course our economy thrived in the following decades. This is not the 1950/60's. Europe does not have a slew of essentially captive markets in which to sell its goods and services.
@randahl Been thinking this. You're so right.
@randahl @anderspuck If #DonaldTrump as @potus exits #NATO, then I fully expect #Putin to use mini-nukes in #Ukraine 🇺🇦.
@darnell @randahl @potus Why would he do that? Nukes is something you use if you are about to lose.

@anderspuck @randahl @potus These would be much smaller than your typical nuke. They are also called tactical nukes & they would take out a city block.

👉🏾 Tactical nuclear weapons explained https://youtu.be/O6kC2AYK4Ow

#Putin would use them to take out a military battalion. Or to force #Ukraine 🇺🇦 into surrendering.

Tactical nuclear weapons explained

YouTube
@darnell @randahl @potus I know what a low yield nuclear weapon is.
Let me respond with another YouTube video about why it is unlikely that Russia will use nukes in Ukraine: https://youtu.be/v4mZPc_kkys
Can Russia win in Ukraine with nuclear weapons?

YouTube
@anderspuck @randahl @potus I hope you are right (great video, thanks for the link). Putin is one of the few dictators who does not seem to care about harming civilians—or at least the image of appearing to harm civilians. Now we have to deal with Trump in the US. This is not fun! Sigh…
@darnell @anderspuck @randahl @potus It’s not about care about civilians. It’s about the (lack of) military utility.
@darnell @anderspuck @randahl @[email protected] Believe me, Anders knows more about nukes than you do.

@martinlentink @anderspuck @randahl @potus That is cool & dandy, but what if #DonaldTrump pulls out of #NATO, or refuses to defend a NATO country if they are attacked‽ #Trump was uttering this nonsense while campaigning in my area.

John Bolton (his former National Security Advisor) stated he believes Trump will exit NATO: https://youtu.be/TeBAF2khal0

John Bolton: ‘I’m convinced’ Trump ‘withdraw from NATO, which would be a catastrophic mistake’

YouTube

@darnell @anderspuck @randahl @[email protected]

Yes. That's what the whole thread was about. How do we, as Europe, handle our security. Most of us are, still, democracies.
You made a remark to Anders Puck. Read his bio, he knows a lot more about nukes than you and I know combined.

@martinlentink @anderspuck @randahl @potus Putin (for good reason) fears the United States 🇺🇸. If Trump exits NATO, that would mean only the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 & France 🇫🇷 would have nukes (the rest of NATO’s nukes are owned & controlled by America 🇺🇸): https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_50068.htm

Putin is evil crazy, & I would not put it past him to use a nukes if America exits NATO. He is already attacking civilian targets & torturing non-combatants.

NATO’s nuclear deterrence policy and forces

Nuclear weapons are a core component of NATO’s overall capabilities for deterrence and defence, alongside conventional and missile defence forces. NATO is committed to arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation, but as long as nuclear weapons exist, it will remain a nuclear alliance.

NATO
@randahl Totally agree. It's time to end "Chamberlain" mode and start an Euroforce, an european military alliance inside NATO, but as strong as US. Europe needs to be adult and pull the plug from US defense.
@randahl I want that for Europe. I am glad the UK voted accordingly, but, will it last?
@randahl Just as we freed you from the Nazis, I hope you free us from the Nazis
@randahl I don’t think that it’s even necessary for the US to pull out of NATO. Trump1 mentioned that the US may not react if Russia invades a NATO member. That’s enough to damage NATO’s central promise. Voting for Trump2 is the end of it.
Unfortunately this means that Europe has to be able to defend itself without NATO. That means giving even more money/power to the military industrial complex and to open the door for future military conflicts with the US.