This is a photo of women in Iran in 1971. Now Iranian women would be arrested, and possibly never seen again, if they had their hair uncovered and dressed this way.

Never take women's rights for granted.

Zealots who want to control women need to be stopped. Every. Time.

@MeanwhileinCanada looking at old pictures of life in Iran and Afghanistan in the 1960s and 1970s always make me feel sad
@gavinisdie @MeanwhileinCanada What I wonder, though, is whether women in Iran, Afghanistan etc. back in those days enjoyed these freedoms generally, or whether that was the preserve of the affluent, educated, professional upper-middle and upper classes in the major cities?

@marcas @gavinisdie @MeanwhileinCanada that doesn't really matter in this case, does it? The point is, that these women on this picture are not nowadays allowed to do what they did in the 70s. Even if it were only five women in the whole country who were dressing like this, they were free to do so. They would not be free to do so today.

So I wonder, if I misunderstood your post? Or was it just a random thought, not really connected to the original post?

@theVedek @marcas @gavinisdie @MeanwhileinCanada

YMMV, but personally I feel if the privileged few apply different standards to themselves than they do on the masses (and not just behind closed doors), it's even more wrong than otherwise, what ever the law. After all, they're not ready to follow it itself.

@MeanwhileinCanada
Israel is as bad or worse...it's a cult.
@GatekeepKen oh boy, waited for some anti-Israel sock-puppet to chime in. 🙄
@GatekeepKen I do believe it's Islam and Christianity that specify the death penalty for witchcraft... nothing to do with Israel.
@GatekeepKen @MeanwhileinCanada I don't support anything, but don't get confused state, culture, and religion from the Israelites or especially Jews from abroad
@epistomai @GatekeepKen @MeanwhileinCanada The issue is the apparent desire of Netanyahu and those who blindly follow him in his attempt to exterminate Palestinians who wanted to live a peaceful life in Gaza or any bystanders who happened to be nearby, not against Israel or Jewish people anywhere.

@bouriquet @MeanwhileinCanada which Palestinians? he expanded to half Arabic peninsula and going for Iran now!

If he had US support, he would try to wipe out every arab in the area. Not every Jew, Israeli, or American wants that, fortunately

@MeanwhileinCanada An old article about how Iraq was FAR ahead of the U.S. in women's rights

http://www.satyamag.com/feb07/mohammed.html

Satya Feb 07: Interview with Yanar Mohammed

@MeanwhileinCanada as an American I like to point out, our shitty government is more responsible for the fall of the up and coming middle east.

Islam was just a really convenient tool for population control and radicalization that backfired on our government and the younger generations have been taking the brunt of that fuckup. Being sent twice to go in and try to clean up Bush Sr and Reagan's fuckery of the area. (Gulf war and war on terror).

FeelsBadman

@MeanwhileinCanada ALT text: a photograph of five Iranian women in 1971, wearing western clothes of the era: short skirts, earth tones, no head scarves.
@MeanwhileinCanada All true. Equally true is the UK and USA interfered, at the behest of BP, to get the Shah overthrown.
Those women could dress like that under the Shah's rule.
@WilliamNB
I think you might have your facts mixed up. The US was involved in a coup to remove the democratically elected prime minister at which point the shah was installed into power. And yes, it involved oil and who controlled it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat#:~:text=The%201953%20Iranian%20coup%20d,Mohammad%20Reza%20Pahlavi%2C%20on%2019
1953 Iranian coup d'état - Wikipedia

@MeanwhileinCanada I think the question is if women are people or property.

It seems to me that conservative religious regimes consider women to be an exotic form of livestock. Natalist propaganda reminds me of Ceaucescu who treated orphans as a cash crop.

Margaret Atwood has done a good job of presenting this trend in her novels.

@MeanwhileinCanada

Iran, from 1953 to 1979, was ruled by a brutal despot, the Shah.

During his reign Iran had secret police, the SAVAK, who would jail people or outright murder them for voicing dissent. He lavished himself in luxury, especially in 1967, when he crowned himself Shāhanshāh, literally "King of Kings," — because being King wasn't enough.

The reason his reign of terror holds such a propagandistic place in western media is because he was a useful puppet to the British and the US.

@MeanwhileinCanada

The groundwork for Ayatollah Khomeini was laid by the British and the US dominating Iran for their economic interests, including overthrowing the democratically elected government in 1953, because it threatened to introduce socialism to Iran's oil, attacking British superiority.

The truth is, the vitriol against modern Iran, which is merely a continuation of the previous authoritarianism, is entirely about it no longer being economically friendly to the US and the UK.

@MeanwhileinCanada

All this crap and propaganda about "women's rights" or "LGBTQ rights" in the Middle East is a smokescreen. If the west gave two shits about these rights, they'd concentrate their efforts on foreign exchange programs, promotion of socio-cultural exports, diplomatic soft power, and normalized relations and trade.

But that would mean accepting that these states get to control their own resources, which would make life in the West more expensive. And that is unacceptable.

@MeanwhileinCanada

You want to push back against Trumpism, Christian Nationalism, etc.?

Knock yourself out.

But don't buy into the propaganda bullshit that Iran was this glorious egalitarian paradise before the rise of Islamism and the Ayatollah.

He's just the despot that wouldn't play ball. They love the despots that do.

@timfordwrites @MeanwhileinCanada

>The truth is, the vitriol against modern
>Iran, which is merely a continuation of
>the previous authoritarianism
Have you even been in Iran once?
They live in a literal late USSR with their hypocritical religious despots instead of the Party and Quran instead of Marxism.
Cut that bullshit about anti-colonialism and freedom-fighters.

Iran is just now helping to bomb a country in Europe to help a fellow from dictator-club.
Would it, just theoretically, try to feed all sorts of religious shitheads in the region?

@MeanwhileinCanada

Afganistan 1970s. As of this week, women aren't even allowed to talk to each other.

@MeanwhileinCanada not even "would be", it happened literally yesterday
@MeanwhileinCanada not included in this picture: the Shah’s secret police, or his many political prisoners.
@MeanwhileinCanada a must read #book by #author Marjan Kamali “the lion women of Tehran”
@MeanwhileinCanada It's not like that anymore because of a US coup that overthrew their secular democratically elected government.
Every person that's died in #Iran since that day is a casualty of United States imperialism.
That girl everyone keeps posting that's dead now. You did that or I guess I did that. Technically I'm in the states. I mean you're in Canada. I'm sure you know how that is 😏
My point is every one of these people you're all so sorry for died because of America wanting cheaper oil because democracy was too expensive.

@MeanwhileinCanada

religion is a mental disease ...

@MeanwhileinCanada Religous zealots are the worst.

@MeanwhileinCanada Doubly ironic, given that the US and Britain helped to overthrow Iran’s democratically-elected government in 1953, which eventually led to the Iranian Revolution in 1979 that turned Iran into the Islamic theocracy it is today.

#Blowback, bіtches!

@MeanwhileinCanada Bear in mind that womens' rights encompass so much more than clothing. Iran under the Shah was an absolute dictatorship - sorry, "monarchy" - and the secret police, SAVAK, would routinely imprison, torture, and kill people who disagreed with the regime too vocally. When the theocrats took over in 1979, they reused to facilities and rehired the staff.

Let's not romanticize the Shah's autocracy, which was installed by US/UK interests to protect its oil revenues.

@klausfiend @MeanwhileinCanada

Alternatives at the moment:
"From the Iran crisis of 1946 onwards, Tudeh became a pro-Soviet organization and remained prepared to carry out the dictates of the Kremlin, even if it meant sacrificing Iranian political independence and sovereignty."

@MeanwhileinCanada -- Probably there is a link between that picture and the hundreds of Iranian drones killing civilians in Ukraine every night ? The same way of thinking.
@MeanwhileinCanada What happened in Iran breaks my heart. I'd love to be able to visit Iran in the early 70's.
@MeanwhileinCanada That is from Afghanistan in the seventries, when the Communist Party ruled there.
Iran in the seventies was a brutal dictatorship. No one was free then.
@Hoodedman @MeanwhileinCanada
The same communist party, which ended in:
"Amin kept a portrait of Joseph Stalin on his desk. When Soviet officials criticized him of his brutality, Amin replied "Comrade Stalin showed us how to build socialism in a backward country."
And killing of Amin by USSR forces for damaging reputation of Communism (LoL).
Shouldn't be a dictatorship then.
@tyx @MeanwhileinCanada The great communist rule in Afghanistan ended because the United States supported/created the mujahedin, what morphed into al queda. As usual.

@Hoodedman @MeanwhileinCanada

Oka-a-ay, If you think that a dictator too bloodthirsty even for USSR Politburo is a "great communist rule", then It says a lot about your views.

And if you think Soviet occupation after killing Amin was any better than English colonialism, you're just delusional (before you start "it's just a propaganda!!!": I was born in USSR and worked a long time in the Central Asia).

@tyx @MeanwhileinCanada every time I read rightwing shit, lies and fantasies like yours, i want to puke. You deserve the utmost disrespect.
@MeanwhileinCanada
Fucking heartbreaking. Every time I see it.
@MeanwhileinCanada Only if the Brits and the CIA had not meddled and deposed a democratically elected PM, Mossadegh https://traffic.libsyn.com/yinhistory/EP07_-_1953_Iran_and_1956_Hungary.mp3
@MeanwhileinCanada
Since you seem intersted in historical facts, may I ask you the proportion of the Iranian women dressed like this before 1979?
80? 50? 30? 10? 5? 1?