@hacks4pancakes I cannot understand how it's still a coin toss. I don't understand how half the US look at the options and still vote for him?!
I'm sorry for how stressful it must be. I'm over the pond, and it worries me what might be coming, and what effect it might have.
@hacks4pancakes the whole electorial collage is nuts!
Our voting system here is old hat, but it's still a little fairer than the U.S. system.
I've certainly got my fingers crossed that all the polls are wrong, and it'll be a landslide victory for Harris.
It's not just a matter of caring to vote, it's also about votes being actively suppressed. Hundreds of thousands of people have been struck from voter roles. Polling places have been closed. In some places, it's illegal to drive someone else to a polling place. Early voting shortened, mail in voting made more difficult. Election day is a work day for most people, and employers are only legally required to give 2 hours to vote.
We had an opportunity to correct some of this, and Joe Manchin decided that the filibusterer was more important. That man bears more blame for this than any one person who decides to stay home or vote for a third party.
@farbel @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
We can, and we should, and hopefully we will. But just like your dentist shaming you doesn't actually make you want to take better care of your teeth, blaming the victims of voter suppression isn't going to make them want to show up.
@notNapoleon @farbel @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
nobody is doing that though
nobody sane blames someone who is prevented from contributing
rather, you're changing the topic
you need to admit there are toxic idealists out there who do not vote or vote third party
that's privileged and entitled behavior by those people:
they act in a way there will be no consequences for them, while they throw others under the bus for their "morality"- ego masturbation
they don't know or they don't care
@benroyce @notNapoleon @farbel @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
> you need to admit there are toxic idealists out there who do not vote or vote third party
Okay. What makes you think they're the problem?
Your phrasing suggests that you're too angry/afraid to think strategically about this. If you act out of anger or fear without carefully considering what made you feel that way, it's easy to direct it at other people who are angry/afraid, instead of at the people who are causing the problem.
@darcher @notNapoleon @farbel @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
that's my point
those who do not vote or vote third party are valuing their emotional reactions over strategic thinking
@benroyce so if I understand correctly, your're sayinig that valuing emotional reactions over strategic thinking is toxic?
@darcher @notNapoleon @farbel @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
absolutely
those who intend us harm try hard to reduce us to anxiety anger and loathing, so that we short circuit our higher faculties and make decisions that help them, and harm us, in the end. and many of us are too emotionally hobbled to notice the manipulation
@benroyce yes, that is definitely something people who intend us harm do.
@WhiteCatTamer @benroyce @farbel
Duly noted. Are you all doing any GOTV or outreach right now?
@WhiteCatTamer Then I would encourage you to discuss this topic, and the vote-shaming approach in general, with whoever the most experienced members of your group are. Especially if you're working with a downballot local race.
@farbel I think you should mention that to whoever is in charge of your voter outreach scripts, so they can take it into account.
@WhiteCatTamer @benroyce @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
@darcher @farbel @WhiteCatTamer @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
what is your concrete effective suggestion to improve outreach other than "it needs to be changed"?
yes it needs to be changed
to what?
a serious question, if you have anything to offer
do we coddle the feelings of those who do not vote, seduce them into voting?
since we lack the ability to appeal to their sense of social responsibility, since if they had that, they would already be voting
@callisto @darcher @farbel @WhiteCatTamer @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
yeah, i had this problem in another thread
group 1: 100% valid reasons to be unable to vote due to disenfranchisement and voter suppression
group 2: completely able to vote, just choosing not to
i am not sure why discussion of group 2 automatically invokes discussion of group 1, when i see two entirely different topics
but many many times i talk about group 2, and group 1 gets invoked
i don't understand it
@benroyce @callisto @darcher @farbel @WhiteCatTamer @notNapoleon @hazz223
What crosses my eyes is the ‘I’m not voting in this election because I don’t like the POTUS candidates” folks.
Like somehow it’s the only election ever so every four years they get to dust off the same old statement while completely ignoring every other elected office. They don’t even know who’s on their local school board.
@callisto @darcher @farbel @WhiteCatTamer @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
no i get it, lots of reason why people don't vote, and there's crosschatter because for each group the approach is very diferent
I've been thinking about this (plenty of time to think since contact rate has been abysmal since July - I'd thought it was the heat, but still nobody's answering their doors now). I'm thinking now that people who are perceived as choosing not to vote, fall into three categories:
(1) People who really, truly have no significant barriers and just choose not to vote. Those people are so ignorant of their privilege that they'd vote for Trump anyway. Good riddance.
1/n
(2) People who don't fully understand, and/or are ashamed of, their own barriers to voting. I have in mind Devon Price's fantastic essay "Laziness Does Not Exist" - his focus wasn't on voting, but the points he makes are universal to any task or demand. https://drdevonprice.substack.com/p/laziness-does-not-exist
... 2/4
@darcher @WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
what is your approach other than "don't voter shame"
a serious question as to effectiveness
it seems to me that blame shifting away from those who do not vote doesn't achieve anything, just as much as you would say that "voter shaming" doesn't achieve anything
many lack the social responsibility to vote
but as with many toxic personal problems like that, you can't help someone if they don't admit they have a problem
@benroyce I will, again and stil gently, encourage you to discuss this with people you trust, who have also done significant amounts of GOTV. Typically they will tell you up front that turnout is more effective than conversion, and also that if you do want to persuade you have to "meet people where they are" or some variation on that.
So maybe before asking what to do instead of shaming, ask "who am I trying to persuade?"
@WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
@farbel I've done significant amounts of GOTV, as well as some other kinds of organizing, but right now I'm just trying to prevent people who think they're helping from fucking this up any worse than what's strictly necessary.
@benroyce @WhiteCatTamer @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
@darcher @farbel @WhiteCatTamer @notNapoleon @hazz223
just to clarify:
you are saying that blame is on those who shame nonvoters, and not the nonvoters themselves?
@darcher @WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
thank you. so you're suggesting a sort of intervention, psychological counseling, or therapeutic approach as to assuaging the emotions of those who do not vote?
since we're beyond strategic thinking and rational reasons as to why some people don't vote, and well into emotional reactions as the basis for their intransigence
@benroyce honestly? I don't think you're going to learn anything from me, because you don't trust me. But if you can find somebody you trust, who is also an experienced organizer, and you talk to them about it, who knows?
@WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
@darcher @WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
it's not a matter of trust, i just look dimly at blame shift away from those who don't vote
they deserve 100% of the blame
so i prod you for concrete solutions, because blame shift doesn't solve anything
and to clarify: i am specifically talking about those who are able to vote, and choose not to
i am not at all talking about those who are unable to vote due to voter suppression
@benroyce my concrete solution, for you, is to spend some time talking to people you think should vote, so that you can find out for yourself what works to motivates them.
The term for the people you're mad at is "principled" non-voters. Thera are so few of them that it's ridiculous to even mention them, and only people who haven't done much GOTV focus on them. The people you win or lose with are "marginal" and "disinterested" non-voters.
@darcher @WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hazz223
very well said, and thank you
it is 100% valid to say that the toxic idealist nonvoter is not the population to aim at, because the toxic idealist nonvoter is immovable dead weight
while there are others that can be reached, because their motivations are different
> there are others that can be reached, because their motivations are different
Precisely. And I'm not a fan of "online isn't real life" but one thing that's very different is that social media tricks you into thinking that people are paying attention. Most of them aren't, and those are the ones you should care about. In particular you should listen to WHY they don't pay attention.
@darcher @WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hazz223
thank you, this was a fruitful conversation. you're absolutely right
@darcher @benroyce @farbel @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223 Is this something that you communicate to leftists who accuse Democrats of “pandering to the right” and “ignoring the left” when the focus is on moderates or the disenfranchised? Do you push back on that, too?
Again: do you plan to vote?
@benroyce @darcher @WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
Offer something better. One of the better things is dignity and respect. Another is the confidence in having a thing people want, and knowing everyone wants to have that.
Leave the cookies on the table. They'll get eaten
If you expect immediate capitulation, you're pissing on the cookies.
@janisf @darcher @WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hazz223
very well said, but allow me an analogy:
an alcoholic
the same psychology as a nonvoter: doing something toxic that hurts them (drinking/ not voting)
what worries me is they don't change their behavior until they hit rock bottom and admit they have a problem (lose their house and their wife/ lose their country to fascism)
how do you get an alcoholic/ nonvoter to change *before* the tragedy that causes self-reflection
@benroyce @janisf @darcher @WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hazz223 Trump failed to even accomplish anything, a historic failure of a presidency. I don't understand even if you believed his bullshit why you'd nominate him again given his history of failure.
If actual observed failure - pandemic bungling, proven collusion with Russia, increased taxes on workers and inability to wrangle his own party into doing anything of substance hasn't convinced voters then I'm not sure anything would.
yes
apart from the strategic value, doing do also soothes that pesky feeling of being a better moral actor 😡
@WhiteCatTamer @benroyce @farbel @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223