@hacks4pancakes I cannot understand how it's still a coin toss. I don't understand how half the US look at the options and still vote for him?!
I'm sorry for how stressful it must be. I'm over the pond, and it worries me what might be coming, and what effect it might have.
It's not just a matter of caring to vote, it's also about votes being actively suppressed. Hundreds of thousands of people have been struck from voter roles. Polling places have been closed. In some places, it's illegal to drive someone else to a polling place. Early voting shortened, mail in voting made more difficult. Election day is a work day for most people, and employers are only legally required to give 2 hours to vote.
We had an opportunity to correct some of this, and Joe Manchin decided that the filibusterer was more important. That man bears more blame for this than any one person who decides to stay home or vote for a third party.
@farbel @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
We can, and we should, and hopefully we will. But just like your dentist shaming you doesn't actually make you want to take better care of your teeth, blaming the victims of voter suppression isn't going to make them want to show up.
@notNapoleon @farbel @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
nobody is doing that though
nobody sane blames someone who is prevented from contributing
rather, you're changing the topic
you need to admit there are toxic idealists out there who do not vote or vote third party
that's privileged and entitled behavior by those people:
they act in a way there will be no consequences for them, while they throw others under the bus for their "morality"- ego masturbation
they don't know or they don't care
@benroyce @notNapoleon @farbel @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
> you need to admit there are toxic idealists out there who do not vote or vote third party
Okay. What makes you think they're the problem?
Your phrasing suggests that you're too angry/afraid to think strategically about this. If you act out of anger or fear without carefully considering what made you feel that way, it's easy to direct it at other people who are angry/afraid, instead of at the people who are causing the problem.
@WhiteCatTamer @benroyce @farbel
Duly noted. Are you all doing any GOTV or outreach right now?
@WhiteCatTamer Then I would encourage you to discuss this topic, and the vote-shaming approach in general, with whoever the most experienced members of your group are. Especially if you're working with a downballot local race.
@farbel I think you should mention that to whoever is in charge of your voter outreach scripts, so they can take it into account.
@WhiteCatTamer @benroyce @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
@darcher @farbel @WhiteCatTamer @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
what is your concrete effective suggestion to improve outreach other than "it needs to be changed"?
yes it needs to be changed
to what?
a serious question, if you have anything to offer
do we coddle the feelings of those who do not vote, seduce them into voting?
since we lack the ability to appeal to their sense of social responsibility, since if they had that, they would already be voting
@callisto @darcher @farbel @WhiteCatTamer @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
yeah, i had this problem in another thread
group 1: 100% valid reasons to be unable to vote due to disenfranchisement and voter suppression
group 2: completely able to vote, just choosing not to
i am not sure why discussion of group 2 automatically invokes discussion of group 1, when i see two entirely different topics
but many many times i talk about group 2, and group 1 gets invoked
i don't understand it
@callisto @darcher @farbel @WhiteCatTamer @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
no i get it, lots of reason why people don't vote, and there's crosschatter because for each group the approach is very diferent
I've been thinking about this (plenty of time to think since contact rate has been abysmal since July - I'd thought it was the heat, but still nobody's answering their doors now). I'm thinking now that people who are perceived as choosing not to vote, fall into three categories:
(1) People who really, truly have no significant barriers and just choose not to vote. Those people are so ignorant of their privilege that they'd vote for Trump anyway. Good riddance.
1/n
(2) People who don't fully understand, and/or are ashamed of, their own barriers to voting. I have in mind Devon Price's fantastic essay "Laziness Does Not Exist" - his focus wasn't on voting, but the points he makes are universal to any task or demand. https://drdevonprice.substack.com/p/laziness-does-not-exist
... 2/4
and (3) People who don't understand what's on their ballot, and are too ashamed of it to ask for help. Context for this includes my experience gathering signatures for two separate anti-gerrymandering ballot initiatives.
There are a small handful of people who are just fine with gerrymandering. But most of the time, somebody who says "I'm good" when asked to sign, is someone who doesn't know how redistricting works ....
3/4
... but is embarrassed to admit it to the canvasser. It's not hard to see.
There's also the simple fact that shaming people who deserve it might feel good, but it doesn't motivate them to do anything - and just as "deplorables" landed on a WHOLE lot of rural folk like me who recoil at Trump way harder than the Clintons ever did - shaming non-voters lands hard on those who are already ashamed of the reasons they don't vote.
4/4
a lot of reasons people were shamed, and are shamed, are for utterly invalid even repugnant reasons for things that are not shameful
we've backed off on shaming people. for very good reasons
but i see not voting as akin to littering
you could have a whole range of reasons for why someone litters, some of them sympathetic
but we still should not litter
and we still should always vote
and there ought to be shame in littering or not voting
outside of any other issues