@hacks4pancakes I cannot understand how it's still a coin toss. I don't understand how half the US look at the options and still vote for him?!
I'm sorry for how stressful it must be. I'm over the pond, and it worries me what might be coming, and what effect it might have.
It's not just a matter of caring to vote, it's also about votes being actively suppressed. Hundreds of thousands of people have been struck from voter roles. Polling places have been closed. In some places, it's illegal to drive someone else to a polling place. Early voting shortened, mail in voting made more difficult. Election day is a work day for most people, and employers are only legally required to give 2 hours to vote.
We had an opportunity to correct some of this, and Joe Manchin decided that the filibusterer was more important. That man bears more blame for this than any one person who decides to stay home or vote for a third party.
@farbel @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
We can, and we should, and hopefully we will. But just like your dentist shaming you doesn't actually make you want to take better care of your teeth, blaming the victims of voter suppression isn't going to make them want to show up.
@notNapoleon @farbel @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
nobody is doing that though
nobody sane blames someone who is prevented from contributing
rather, you're changing the topic
you need to admit there are toxic idealists out there who do not vote or vote third party
that's privileged and entitled behavior by those people:
they act in a way there will be no consequences for them, while they throw others under the bus for their "morality"- ego masturbation
they don't know or they don't care
@benroyce @notNapoleon @farbel @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
> you need to admit there are toxic idealists out there who do not vote or vote third party
Okay. What makes you think they're the problem?
Your phrasing suggests that you're too angry/afraid to think strategically about this. If you act out of anger or fear without carefully considering what made you feel that way, it's easy to direct it at other people who are angry/afraid, instead of at the people who are causing the problem.
@WhiteCatTamer @benroyce @farbel
Duly noted. Are you all doing any GOTV or outreach right now?
@WhiteCatTamer Then I would encourage you to discuss this topic, and the vote-shaming approach in general, with whoever the most experienced members of your group are. Especially if you're working with a downballot local race.
@darcher @WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
what is your approach other than "don't voter shame"
a serious question as to effectiveness
it seems to me that blame shifting away from those who do not vote doesn't achieve anything, just as much as you would say that "voter shaming" doesn't achieve anything
many lack the social responsibility to vote
but as with many toxic personal problems like that, you can't help someone if they don't admit they have a problem
@benroyce I will, again and stil gently, encourage you to discuss this with people you trust, who have also done significant amounts of GOTV. Typically they will tell you up front that turnout is more effective than conversion, and also that if you do want to persuade you have to "meet people where they are" or some variation on that.
So maybe before asking what to do instead of shaming, ask "who am I trying to persuade?"
@WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
@darcher @WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
thank you. so you're suggesting a sort of intervention, psychological counseling, or therapeutic approach as to assuaging the emotions of those who do not vote?
since we're beyond strategic thinking and rational reasons as to why some people don't vote, and well into emotional reactions as the basis for their intransigence
@benroyce honestly? I don't think you're going to learn anything from me, because you don't trust me. But if you can find somebody you trust, who is also an experienced organizer, and you talk to them about it, who knows?
@WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
@darcher @WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hacks4pancakes @hazz223
it's not a matter of trust, i just look dimly at blame shift away from those who don't vote
they deserve 100% of the blame
so i prod you for concrete solutions, because blame shift doesn't solve anything
and to clarify: i am specifically talking about those who are able to vote, and choose not to
i am not at all talking about those who are unable to vote due to voter suppression
@benroyce my concrete solution, for you, is to spend some time talking to people you think should vote, so that you can find out for yourself what works to motivates them.
The term for the people you're mad at is "principled" non-voters. Thera are so few of them that it's ridiculous to even mention them, and only people who haven't done much GOTV focus on them. The people you win or lose with are "marginal" and "disinterested" non-voters.
@darcher @WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hazz223
very well said, and thank you
it is 100% valid to say that the toxic idealist nonvoter is not the population to aim at, because the toxic idealist nonvoter is immovable dead weight
while there are others that can be reached, because their motivations are different
> there are others that can be reached, because their motivations are different
Precisely. And I'm not a fan of "online isn't real life" but one thing that's very different is that social media tricks you into thinking that people are paying attention. Most of them aren't, and those are the ones you should care about. In particular you should listen to WHY they don't pay attention.
@darcher @WhiteCatTamer @farbel @notNapoleon @hazz223
thank you, this was a fruitful conversation. you're absolutely right